/NetBackup_Enterprise_Server/281623.pdf
If you use nbu 6.x you have to open only 2 ports, 4 if you want to use
security (NO, DO NOT USE IT)
stefanos
---Original Message---
From: Anders Thome [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Reducing Netbackup reserved ports on the master
server
Sent
Hi!
Anyone know what the impact of reducing the number of reserved ports on
at netbackup master server is?
The Default is 512-1023. If we reduce it to ie. 512-600 Will
that mean that we get lesser bandwidth for clients? This customer has
about 60 NBU clients.
The reason for
Use vnetd.
Anders Thome wrote:
Hi!
Anyone know what the impact of reducing the number of reserved ports
on at netbackup master server is?
The Default is 512-1023. If we reduce it to ie. 512-600 Will
that mean that we get lesser bandwidth for clients? This customer has
Why not use vnetd. If it is 6.0 or above a 6.0 client and server use port 13724
( vnetd ) to communicate. In 5.1 you have to configure it.
--- Anders Thome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Anyone know what the impact of reducing the number of reserved ports on
at netbackup master server
Although be careful: there is/was a bug (feature?) in NBU which may
prevent you from performing synthetic full backups across a firewall.
The firewalled client makes a call back to the master server on a random
port. This wasn't documented when we originally ran into this problem.
Not sure if
---Original Message---
From: Anders Thome [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Reducing Netbackup reserved ports on the master server
Sent: Sep 05 '07 08:56
Hi!
Anyone know what the impact of reducing the number of reserved ports on at
netbackup master server
] Reducing Netbackup reserved ports on the
master server
Why not use vnetd. If it is 6.0 or above a 6.0 client and server use
port 13724
( vnetd ) to communicate. In 5.1 you have to configure it.
--- Anders Thome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Anyone know what the impact of reducing
