: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 5:28 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Remote Online Backups
I dislike spam too, but lets not go throwing the Riverbed product
under
the bus because of it. =P
We did a pretty thorough analysis of the Riverbed product versus three
. - Monte
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis Preston
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 10:48 PM
To: Martin, Jonathan; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Remote Online Backups
Right. That's what I've heard
: Friday, March 28, 2008 12:53 PM
To: Curtis Preston; Martin, Jonathan; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Remote Online Backups
We use riverbed in many sites but not specifically for Backup/Restore. I
did test it with NetBackup and it performed quite well. The nice thing
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Remote Online Backups
Yeah, you knuckleheads! Stop replying... to spam... uhm.. threads.
Oops. Oh hell, blame Curtis - he started it! =P
-Jonathan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
Lightner
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Remote Online Backups
This thread didn't really start with the merits or lack thereof of
Riverbed products.
It started with SPAM for Riverbed products.
It hardly seems reasonable to me to reward such SPAM by extolling the
virtues of products of the company
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Remote Online Backups
Message and poster dealt with.
I don't normally post my personal opinions about products, but for some
reason right now I feel inspired.
I don't get the whole Riverbed thing. I don't see any advantages in the
backup arena over using
Performing backups at every remote site is complicated, expensive and risky
too. Doing backup across the WAN is easier, reliable, and more secure.
Have you experimented Riverbed Copy Utility (RCU)?
It would be a great fit.
By overcoming bandwidth limitations and reducing network latency,
FYI: [EMAIL PROTECTED] notified, management at Riverbed Technologies
notified.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
rubbyfiller
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 12:59 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Remote Online
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:veritas-bu-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 7:57 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Remote Online Backups
FYI: [EMAIL PROTECTED] notified, management
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Remote Online Backups
Today, data is the lifeline for organizations, and any unplanned
downtime affects the company's bottom line. To reduce length and
downtime cost during outage, organizations are building infrastructures
to reduce RTO and RPO
Today, data is the lifeline for organizations, and any unplanned downtime
affects the companys bottom line. To reduce length and downtime cost during
outage, organizations are building infrastructures to reduce RTO and RPO. This
approach allows them to compress backup windows, increase the
We have about 40 locations worldwide, with a typical data size of about 200 GB
per location, with some up to 2 TB. Most sites have 1024 to 1536 Kb/s MPLS
links, with a few 2 Mb/s and one 4.5 Mb/s. Central data center has two 45 Mb/s
links.
We are looking to remote, online backups to our data
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 3:43 AM, cindylazz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have about 40 locations worldwide, with a typical data size of about
200 GB per location, with some up to 2 TB. Most sites have 1024 to 1536 Kb/s
MPLS links, with a few 2 Mb/s and one 4.5 Mb/s. Central data center has
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Remote Online Backups
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 3:43 AM, cindylazz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have about 40 locations worldwide, with a typical data size
of about 200 GB per location, with some up to 2 TB. Most sites have 1024
to 1536 Kb/s MPLS links
: [Veritas-bu] Remote Online Backups
A suggestion I tend to favor for Windows is putting in a DFS (or
similar) solution where by all data as Remote Site A is replicated (bit
by changed bit) back to a DFS in the data center. We're using a
home-grown similar solution for our Linux / Unix replication
15 matches
Mail list logo
