Re: [Veritas-bu] MP4 Re: Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 MP4 to

2007-05-14 Thread Darren Dunham
No - it was just Dave talldoode statement about the way command were recommended to expire tapes. My question was about images so maybe bpexpdate will leave the catalog corrupted when it expires the tape. bpexpdate expires images. When you give a volume, it expires all copies of images on

Re: [Veritas-bu] MP4 Re: Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 MP4to

2007-05-14 Thread Curtis Preston
Author of O'Reilly's Backup Recovery and Using SANs and NAS VP Data Protection GlassHouse Technologies -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Dunham Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 8:43 AM To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas

Re: [Veritas-bu] MP4 Re: Taking the plunge to upgrade from 5.1 MP4to

2007-05-14 Thread Darren Dunham
I believe the talldoode comment was about the dreaded vmquery -deassignbyid command, which can definitely shoot you in the foot. In recent versions, the command is still there, but it complains if you use it. It does more than complain. It does not process the request in many situations.

Re: [Veritas-bu] MP4 and I'm broken

2006-11-23 Thread Darren Dunham
Does this mean the problem will appear wherever there are multiple NICs? Does anyone use multiple NICs who has not had this issue with MP4? I'd have though multiple NICs are pretty common these days. How did the alias fix the issue? My server is on two networks. I haven't seen any issues

Re: [Veritas-bu] MP4 and I'm broken

2006-11-23 Thread Scott Jacobson
What was the alias Ed was referring to Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/23/2006 11:29 AM Does this mean the problem will appear wherever there are multiple NICs? Does anyone use multiple NICs who has not had this issue with MP4? I'd have though multiple NICs are pretty common these

Re: [Veritas-bu] MP4 and I'm broken

2006-11-23 Thread Ed Wilts
On 11/23/2006 12:47 PM, Scott Jacobson wrote: What was the alias Ed was referring to It's an emm alias. If your master or media servers have multiple NICs, they probably also have multiple names. In this case, you need to tell emm which alias correspond to which. For example, if you

Re: [Veritas-bu] MP4 and I'm broken

2006-11-22 Thread Dave Brown
closely today. do not want any issues over long weekend Dave From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 12:50 AM To: Dave Brown; List Veritas List Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4 and I'm broken Symantec Support ? Oh dear

Re: [Veritas-bu] MP4 and I'm broken

2006-11-22 Thread Ed Wilts
On 11/22/2006 7:38 AM, Dave Brown wrote: Turned out it was an issue related to multiple NICs in the machine and name resolution. Don't know why the MP had issue with my setup, I have been running 6.0 this way since it was released. We ran into this when we did the MP4beta upgrade. It was

Re: [Veritas-bu] MP4 and I'm broken

2006-11-22 Thread Wilkinson, Tim
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts Sent: Thursday, 23 November 2006 1:14 PM To: Dave Brown Cc: List Veritas List Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] MP4 and I'm broken On 11/22/2006 7:38 AM, Dave Brown wrote: Turned out it was an issue related to multiple NICs in the machine and name

Re: [Veritas-bu] MP4 and I'm broken

2006-11-21 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Symantec Support ? Oh dear does not sound good ! Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS) Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dave

RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4 for NBU 5.1 Windows 2003

2006-03-02 Thread WEAVER, Simon
@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4 for NBU 5.1 Windows 2003 For 5.1, Yes From: WEAVER, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 9:55 AMTo: Steven Cashman; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4 for NBU 5.1 Windows

RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4

2006-01-12 Thread WEAVER, Simon
] -Original Message- From: DOON ENG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 January 2006 22:03 To: a raja; Conner, Mike; WEAVER, Simon; Ed Wilts Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4 For those with the problem, when VSP does not get cleaned up, which directory

RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4

2006-01-06 Thread WEAVER, Simon
00:46 To: Conner, Mike Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] MP4 On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 03:15:54PM -0500, Conner, Mike wrote: I have Windows 2000 NB 5.1 MP1...just a quick question...do I have to install the MPs on each individual client? Yes. If you have Unix

RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4

2006-01-06 Thread a raja
Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Tel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 January 2006 00:46 To: Conner, Mike Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] MP4

RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4

2006-01-06 Thread Conner, Mike
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4 We did upgraded recently. But we hit problem in win2k3 boxes with VSP problem and C drive getting filled. not getting deleted. regards Raja

RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4

2006-01-06 Thread a raja
Message- From: a raja [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 1/6/2006 12:29 PM To: WEAVER, Simon; 'Ed Wilts'; Conner, Mike Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] MP4 We did upgraded recently. But we hit problem

Re: [Veritas-bu] MP4

2006-01-05 Thread Ed Wilts
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 03:15:54PM -0500, Conner, Mike wrote: I have Windows 2000 NB 5.1 MP1...just a quick question...do I have to install the MPs on each individual client? Yes. If you have Unix clients you can push the maintenance paks out from the server, but for Windows clients you need