Re: [Veritas-bu] why oh why!!!! Did Symantec REALLY say this

2011-05-05 Thread Jim Coby
Re: Sure I read somewhere this was bad practice, but for life of me cant find it! Probably saw this in the release notes on mixed-server compatibility environments. 7.1 release notes page 41. Suspect it id doc’d in other versions of Release notes also. I didn’t check. ■ In a mixed-server

Re: [Veritas-bu] why oh why!!!! Did Symantec REALLY say this

2011-05-05 Thread Len Boyle
Good Afternoon, It would be nice if Symantec could design the client to master interface to be more generic, without hurting performance. Put the smarts for handling client differences in the client and not on the master. Then they should be able to handle not only newer client support needs b

Re: [Veritas-bu] why oh why!!!! Did Symantec REALLY say this

2011-05-05 Thread WEAVER, Simon (external)
ungard.com [mailto:rusty.ma...@sungard.com] Sent: 05 May 2011 18:01 To: WEAVER, Simon (external) Cc: scott.geo...@parker.com; smpt; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] why oh why Did Symantec REALLY say this They told him th

Re: [Veritas-bu] why oh why!!!! Did Symantec REALLY say this

2011-05-05 Thread WEAVER, Simon (external)
atechp.com] Sent: 05 May 2011 18:43 To: rusty.ma...@sungard.com Cc: WEAVER, Simon (external); smpt; veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] why oh why Did Symantec REALLY say this The "problem" with NetBackup is that i

Re: [Veritas-bu] why oh why!!!! Did Symantec REALLY say this

2011-05-05 Thread Valenze, Christopher
. > > > *"WEAVER, Simon (external)" * > Sent by: > > 05/05/2011 11:20 AM > To > smpt , , < > veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> > cc > Subject > Re: [Veritas-bu] why oh why Did Symantec REALLY say this > > > > > Concern I ha

Re: [Veritas-bu] why oh why!!!! Did Symantec REALLY say this

2011-05-05 Thread Rusty.Major
s e-mail from your system. "WEAVER, Simon (external)" Sent by: 05/05/2011 11:20 AM To smpt , , cc Subject Re: [Veritas-bu] why oh why Did Symantec REALLY say this Concern I have is that can you really rely on it. There may be enhancements to the product that the Mas

Re: [Veritas-bu] why oh why!!!! Did Symantec REALLY say this

2011-05-05 Thread WEAVER, Simon (external)
n.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] why oh why!!!! Did Symantec REALLY say this Well, it is not supported but is working. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 6:04

Re: [Veritas-bu] why oh why!!!! Did Symantec REALLY say this

2011-05-05 Thread smpt
Sent: 05 May 2011 15:33 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] why oh why Did Symantec REALLY say this We found this out all on our own, without Symantec's blessing. They came a little late with their 2008 R2 support, so they let this go on for CYA. We were

Re: [Veritas-bu] why oh why!!!! Did Symantec REALLY say this

2011-05-05 Thread WEAVER, Simon (external)
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] why oh why Did Symantec REALLY say this We found this out all on our own, without Symantec's blessing. They came a little late with their 2008 R2 support, so they let this go on for CYA. We were doing this before we went to 7.0.1. When yo

Re: [Veritas-bu] why oh why!!!! Did Symantec REALLY say this

2011-05-05 Thread scott . george
We found this out all on our own, without Symantec's blessing. They came a little late with their 2008 R2 support, so they let this go on for CYA. We were doing this before we went to 7.0.1. When you are caught in the dilemma of getting backups or being supported, well, I choose the former.