Re: [Veritas-bu] drives going down on media servers

2006-01-24 Thread Roger Dombrowski

Hi Blaine,

I have been looking to try and solve this problem for two sites that I'm 
working with right now
and we're not having much luck either.  In my travels I've talked to a 
few folks that have seen
this External Event issue caused by monitoring software. One client in 
particular found that one
of Sun's monitoring tools was sending out scsi inquiries and causing the 
external event rewinds.


I also ran across a post on this mailing list that documents about 30 
such applications that have
been known to cause this type of behaviour.  Try searching this list for 
external event. If a get

a chance, I'll try and dig it up and send you the post I'm thinking of.

Through the course of my research I've basically found that two things 
are trying to communicate
with the drive and most folks check out the data path (hba's, switches, 
bridges,...) to look for problems.


Maybe the upgrade stepped on some scsi reservation setting. If I find 
anything else, I'll post to the

list...

Blaine Robison wrote:


I am having a similar issue. I have a windows 2000 master and a pair of sun
480's with 8 LTO2 drives shared between them. I get External Event caused
rewind error and the tapes get frozen or the drives go down. I didn't have the
problem unti lI upgraded to 5.1 MP4. I have gone over the entire configuration
and cannot find a problem. 

Has anyone else seen this and found a resolution?   


--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 


Have you tried /var/adm/messages (Solaris) or the equivalent log ?

Regards
Michael

On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:00:24 +, Dave Markham wrote
   

I have 1 master server, and 2 media servers connected over fiber to 
an L700. Im not sure what the switch in the middle is as didnt 
install the system or have any info on it.


There are 5 drives in the L700 and 3 of them are shared with sso 
option to the master, and both media servers.


People i have had an issue lately with drives being not visible to 
one of my media servers.


I have fixed this by unloading the fibre hba using cfgadm and 
loading it again. It then can see the devices under sgscan and has 
seen them under /dev/rmt


I also noticed the customer had removed a /etc/hosts entry for the 
media servers to talk to each other by the correct name so i put 
that back in and can now talk on port 13701 to each machine in the 
nbu setup.


Whats happening now though is drives just keep going down on the 
media servers and backups are not working. I have ITC enabled so 
each media server needs to lock 2 drives.


I have looked the bptm logs and cant see anything jumping out apart 
from many request medias of different tape ids. I have looked in 
/usr/openv/volmgr/debug/ltid/ and the logs in their show 
successfully on communicating shared drive info to the master.


Therefore i am now stuck and have no idea whats going wrong :(

Anyone any advice/pointers? Is ether anything specific i should be 
looking for in the logs or are there other important logs im not checking.


Thanks
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
 


--
Cybercity Webhosting (http://www.cybercity.dk)

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

   




Blaine Robison
Solaris Ceritfied System Administrator 
Solaris Certified Network Administrator

Veritas Certified Professional
972-853-2459
214-578-5391

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___

Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

 




--
Roger DombrowskidcVAST, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   1327 Butterfield Rd.
ATT: (630) 964-6060Suite 610
FAX:  (630) 964-6069Downers Grove, IL 60515

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] win2k DC restoration

2006-01-24 Thread Karl . Rossing

Hi,

I'm doing to DR testing. I have a unix
master and i'd like to restore the BMR boot/win2k domain controller.

In past versions of windows, I have
installed windows to c:\winnt.dr and then restored the server and set the
boot.ini to boot from c:\winnt

With win2k, i can restore the system
state, so if i want to restore my domain controller, can i install windows
to winnt and then restore the c: and system state to get the server back?

Karl


RE: [Veritas-bu] win2k DC restoration

2006-01-24 Thread Spearman, David
Title: Message



In 
restoring a DC the steps are very straight foward but slightly different from a 
DR restore of a member server

1. 
Load the correct version of windows (standard, enterprise, whatever) and make it 
a member of a workgroup with the same name as the domain
2. 
Create the disk layout (C, D, E, etc of appropriate sizes)
3. 
Load NBU agent
4. 
Reboot the server and on reboot F8 the system and choose the DOMAIN CONTROLLER 
RESTORE MODE
5. 
Restore the entire system EXCEPT boot.ini
6. 
After the restore reboot, the system will come up and resync with the other DC's 
(if any). Resync can take up to 45 minutes depending on your 
network.

David 
Spearman
County 
of Henrico, Va.

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 10:02 
  AMTo: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: 
  [Veritas-bu] win2k DC restorationHi, I'm 
  doing to DR testing. I have a unix master and i'd like to restore the BMR 
  boot/win2k domain controller. In 
  past versions of windows, I have installed windows to c:\winnt.dr and then 
  restored the server and set the boot.ini to boot from c:\winnt 
  With win2k, i can restore the system 
  state, so if i want to restore my domain controller, can i install windows to 
  winnt and then restore the c: and system state to get the server back? 
  Karl


Re: [Veritas-bu] drives going down on media servers

2006-01-24 Thread Dave Markham
Unbelievably i have seen this yesterday as a windows guy asked me if i 
knew about it seeing as i support Netbackup on solaris.


The fix he got which worked was to disable the Removable storage manager 
service. The errors are no more.


That was on a windows 2003 setup with netbackmup 5.1 mp4

Roger Dombrowski wrote:


Hi Blaine,

I have been looking to try and solve this problem for two sites that 
I'm working with right now
and we're not having much luck either.  In my travels I've talked to a 
few folks that have seen
this External Event issue caused by monitoring software. One client 
in particular found that one
of Sun's monitoring tools was sending out scsi inquiries and causing 
the external event rewinds.


I also ran across a post on this mailing list that documents about 30 
such applications that have
been known to cause this type of behaviour.  Try searching this list 
for external event. If a get

a chance, I'll try and dig it up and send you the post I'm thinking of.

Through the course of my research I've basically found that two things 
are trying to communicate
with the drive and most folks check out the data path (hba's, 
switches, bridges,...) to look for problems.


Maybe the upgrade stepped on some scsi reservation setting. If I find 
anything else, I'll post to the

list...

Blaine Robison wrote:

I am having a similar issue. I have a windows 2000 master and a pair 
of sun
480's with 8 LTO2 drives shared between them. I get External Event 
caused
rewind error and the tapes get frozen or the drives go down. I didn't 
have the
problem unti lI upgraded to 5.1 MP4. I have gone over the entire 
configuration

and cannot find a problem.
Has anyone else seen this and found a resolution?  
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 


Have you tried /var/adm/messages (Solaris) or the equivalent log ?

Regards
Michael

On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:00:24 +, Dave Markham wrote
  

I have 1 master server, and 2 media servers connected over fiber to 
an L700. Im not sure what the switch in the middle is as didnt 
install the system or have any info on it.


There are 5 drives in the L700 and 3 of them are shared with sso 
option to the master, and both media servers.


People i have had an issue lately with drives being not visible to 
one of my media servers.


I have fixed this by unloading the fibre hba using cfgadm and 
loading it again. It then can see the devices under sgscan and has 
seen them under /dev/rmt


I also noticed the customer had removed a /etc/hosts entry for the 
media servers to talk to each other by the correct name so i put 
that back in and can now talk on port 13701 to each machine in the 
nbu setup.


Whats happening now though is drives just keep going down on the 
media servers and backups are not working. I have ITC enabled so 
each media server needs to lock 2 drives.


I have looked the bptm logs and cant see anything jumping out apart 
from many request medias of different tape ids. I have looked in 
/usr/openv/volmgr/debug/ltid/ and the logs in their show 
successfully on communicating shared drive info to the master.


Therefore i am now stuck and have no idea whats going wrong :(

Anyone any advice/pointers? Is ether anything specific i should be 
looking for in the logs or are there other important logs im not 
checking.


Thanks
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu



--
Cybercity Webhosting (http://www.cybercity.dk)

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

  




Blaine Robison
Solaris Ceritfied System Administrator Solaris Certified Network 
Administrator

Veritas Certified Professional
972-853-2459
214-578-5391

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com ___

Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

 






___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Safe to upgrade to 6.0 MP1..

2006-01-24 Thread Hampus Lind








Hi all,



How many has go to 6.0 MP1? Is the upgrade from 5.1
MP3 to 6.0 MP1 safe, anything to be careful with?? Does ACSLS connections work
well?

We run HP-UX 11.11 on all servers..



Thanks in advance,

MVH / Hampus Lind
Rikspolisstyrelsen
National Police Board
Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43
Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]










[Veritas-bu] Master and Media HW and OS..

2006-01-24 Thread Hampus Lind








Hi,



We run all our master and media servers on HP PA-RISC
server and HP-UX as OS. These servers cost a lot, not only to buy, but also in
maintenance



What do you guys think about going from the above to
powerful INTEL server with linux as OS instead in a datacenter environment? 

We have about 200 clients and (all full is about ~15TB,
never at one time though) to backup at one of our sites. 



Anyone using this type of solution in DC env`s? Recommendations??




Thankful for advice,

MVH / Hampus Lind
Rikspolisstyrelsen
National Police Board
Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43
Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]










RE: [Veritas-bu] Master and Media HW and OS..

2006-01-24 Thread Mark . Donaldson



A lot 
of us have been having trouble using Linux as a media server, especially in a 
drive-sharing environment.

Check 
the history on ths list for a lot of details.

-M

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Hampus 
  LindSent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 12:05 PMTo: 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Master and 
  Media HW and OS..
  
  Hi,
  
  We run all our master and media 
  servers on HP PA-RISC server and HP-UX as OS. These servers cost a lot, not 
  only to buy, but also in maintenance...
  
  What do you guys think about going 
  from the above to powerful INTEL server with linux as OS instead in a 
  datacenter environment? 
  We have about 200 clients and (all 
  full is about ~15TB, never at one time though) to backup at one of our sites. 
  
  
  Anyone using this type of solution 
  in DC env`s? Recommendations?? 
  
  Thankful for 
  advice,
  MVH / Hampus 
  LindRikspolisstyrelsenNational Police BoardTel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 
  99 43Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  


RE: [Veritas-bu] Master and Media HW and OS..

2006-01-24 Thread Dhotre, Shekhar





I would not recommend Linux for Netbackup 
environment,simply because it cannot be restored on to dissimilar hardware 
in DR like scenario , there are other reasons as well . (I have a list ) 
..
On the cost , I don`t know about HP RISC but 
IBM`s P-series (RISC) hardware which runs AIX is cheaper than Intel 
hardware(surprised??) . I am working on a business case to move oracle 
running on Intel/Linux off to to AIX,So comparing 
Pserise vs... Intel hardware (price,performance ,DR , LVM ,etc..)I 
know thepricing/quotes and other details about the hardware. 
send me an email offline if you need to know more about it . 


Our master and media is running on IBM pserise 
servers P550 . 

http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/p/



Shekhar 
Dhotre
ICTStorage 
Engineering.
v 404.846.7483 
| f 404.848.1077 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]48 
Perimeter Center East | Atlanta, GA 
30346
"Mistakes are a fact of life. It is the response to 
error that counts!" 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 2:17 
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Master and 
Media HW and OS..

A lot 
of us have been having trouble using Linux as a media server, especially in a 
drive-sharing environment.

Check 
the history on ths list for a lot of details.

-M

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Hampus 
  LindSent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 12:05 PMTo: 
  veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Master and 
  Media HW and OS..
  
  Hi,
  
  We run all our master and media 
  servers on HP PA-RISC server and HP-UX as OS. These servers cost a lot, not 
  only to buy, but also in maintenance...
  
  What do you guys think about going 
  from the above to powerful INTEL server with linux as OS instead in a 
  datacenter environment? 
  We have about 200 clients and (all 
  full is about ~15TB, never at one time though) to backup at one of our sites. 
  
  
  Anyone using this type of solution 
  in DC env`s? Recommendations?? 
  
  Thankful for 
  advice,
  MVH / Hampus 
  LindRikspolisstyrelsenNational Police BoardTel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 
  99 43Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  




"This email (including any attachments) is confidential.  If you
are not the intended recipient you must not copy, use, disclose,
distribute or rely on the information contained in it.  If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately
by reply email and delete the email from your system.
Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to this communication
are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you.  Lend
Lease does not guarantee that this email or the attachment(s) are
unaffected by computer virus, corruption or other defects. Lend
Lease may monitor incoming and outgoing emails for compliance with
its Email Policy.  Please note that our servers may not be located
in your country."





RE: [Veritas-bu] Master and Media HW and OS..

2006-01-24 Thread Johnny Oestergaard








I dont know anything about Linux,
but in our installation I use Windows 2003 on my combined master/media server.

The server is a Dell 2850, 2 x 3,6 Ghz HT Xeon
CPUs. I use 2 Emulex LP1 HBAs to give me access to the SAN (2
connections to disk and 2 to tapes) and one Qlogic HBA to connect to the
library.

Connection to our LAN is at the moment 2
Gbit/s

The server feeds 4 STK9940B drives

Except for the LAN connection I really dont
have any problems with performance.

Daily backup volume is around 2,5 
3,0 TB from 80-100 servers running anything from NT 4.0 to Windows 2003,
Exchange, SQL, SPS, BizTalk and God knows what. I even have a bunch of VMware ESX
servers.

After I migrate to NBU 6.0 I will add one
extra media server and share the drives using SSO.



Windows isnt the best
operatingsystem for have I/O load, but I dont want to migrate to Solaris
because of the extra cost and also dont want to use Linux because I am
the only one who knows anything about Linux in our shop. And we have to pay a
lot more for a RedHat ES server licens then what we pay for a Windows licens
(NBU cost is the same for Windows and Linux)



From all what I know about performance on
an Intel box (or AMD) you would get a decent performance out of any box
now-a-days for NBU use.

I would go for a 4 CPU box using Xeon
processors with 4 GB ram, some good HBAs and some good NICs if I
had the money. But a 2 processor box as the one I use can feed 4 drives in my
installation without any real problem.



Even if my info is from Windows, I hope
you can use it.



/johnny











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hampus Lind
Sent: 24. januar 2006 20:05
To:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Master and
Media HW and OS..





Hi,



We run all our master and media servers on HP PA-RISC
server and HP-UX as OS. These servers cost a lot, not only to buy, but also in
maintenance



What do you guys think about going from the above to powerful
INTEL server with linux as OS instead in a datacenter environment? 

We have about 200 clients and (all full is about
~15TB, never at one time though) to backup at one of our sites. 



Anyone using this type of solution in DC env`s?
Recommendations?? 



Thankful for advice,

MVH / Hampus Lind
Rikspolisstyrelsen
National Police Board
Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43
Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]










RE: [Veritas-bu] win2k DC restoration

2006-01-24 Thread Karl . Rossing

Microsoft has a document about dissimilar
HAL's...
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=263532

It doesn't seem to cover moving from
SCSI to ide. Which i think is my current problem...

Karl

Spearman, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 01/24/2006 09:11:17 AM:

 In restoring a DC the steps are very straight foward but slightly

 different from a DR restore of a member server
 
 1. Load the correct version of windows (standard,
enterprise, 
 whatever) and make it a member of a workgroup with the same name as
the domain
 2. Create the disk layout (C, D, E, etc of appropriate
sizes)
 3. Load NBU agent
 4. Reboot the server and on reboot F8 the system
and choose the 
 DOMAIN CONTROLLER RESTORE MODE
 5. Restore the entire system EXCEPT boot.ini
 6. After the restore reboot, the system will
come up and resync with
 the other DC's (if any). Resync can take up to 45 minutes depending

 on your network.
 
 David Spearman
 County of Henrico, Va.
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:veritas-bu-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 10:02 AM
 To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 Subject: [Veritas-bu] win2k DC restoration

 
 Hi, 
 
 I'm doing to DR testing. I have a unix master and i'd like to 
 restore the BMR boot/win2k domain controller. 
 
 In past versions of windows, I have installed windows to c:\winnt.dr
 and then restored the server and set the boot.ini to boot from c:\winnt

 
 With win2k, i can restore the system state, so if i want to restore

 my domain controller, can i install windows to winnt and then 
 restore the c: and system state to get the server back? 
 
 Karl

[Veritas-bu] Strange Incremental backup problem

2006-01-24 Thread Paul Spotts
Using NB 5.0 mp4 

I have a windows nt client using the 4.5 veritas client. It seems to do 
fullbackups ok. But it does not backup the D: drive on inc's. The server died 
and now I can't find any INC's after the last full. (I know files were updated 
on d:). Any thoughts? 

Paul Spotts
Geisinger System Services
Server Management Group 
(570)271-5180
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



IMPORTANT WARNING: The information in this message (and the documents attached 
to it, if any) is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended 
solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is 
unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance on it is 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this message in error, 
please delete all electronic copies of this message (and the documents attached 
to it, if any), destroy any hard copies you may have created and notify me 
immediately by replying to this email. Thank you.

___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


RE: [Veritas-bu] Master and Media HW and OS..

2006-01-24 Thread Scott Jacobson


Johnny,

Can't say I share the same opinion regarding issues with Linux running asmedia or masterservers ina NetBackup environment.

I've been using Linux (SLES 8/9) media servers in a SSO environment with ACSLS for the better part of a year and a half and haven't had any major issues. Sure, setting it up was challenging as there wasn't definitive documentation at the time.

My media servers are a 2x 3.4 MHz (multi threaded) usingeither Intel/AMD with 4 Gb of Ram driving 4 FC LTO II tapes drives (thru QLogic HBA's) with two 1 Gb NIC portsbonded together.

No problems here.

Scott J. "Johnny Oestergaard" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/24/2006 1:11 pm 

I don't know anything about Linux, but in our installation I use Windows 2003 on my combined master/media server.
The server is a Dell 2850, 2 x 3,6 Ghz HT Xeon CPU's. I use 2 Emulex LP1 HBA's to give me access to the SAN (2 connections to disk and 2 to tapes) and one Qlogic HBA to connect to the library.
Connection to our LAN is at the moment 2 Gbit/s
The server feeds 4 STK9940B drives
Except for the LAN connection I really don't have any problems with performance.
Daily backup volume is around 2,5 - 3,0 TB from 80-100 servers running anything from NT 4.0 to Windows 2003, Exchange, SQL, SPS, BizTalk and God knows what. I even have a bunch of VMware ESX servers.
After I migrate to NBU 6.0 I will add one extra media server and share the drives using SSO.

Windows isn't the best operatingsystem for have I/O load, but I don't want to migrate to Solaris because of the extra cost and also don't want to use Linux because I am the only one who knows anything about Linux in our shop. And we have to pay a lot more for a RedHat ES server licens then what we pay for a Windows licens (NBU cost is the same for Windows and Linux)

From all what I know about performance on an Intel box (or AMD) you would get a decent performance out of any box now-a-days for NBU use.
I would go for a 4 CPU box using Xeon processors with 4 GB ram, some good HBA's and some good NIC's if I had the money. But a 2 processor box as the one I use can feed 4 drives in my installation without any real problem.

Even if my info is from Windows, I hope you can use it.

/johnny





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hampus LindSent: 24. januar 2006 20:05To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: [Veritas-bu] Master and Media HW and OS..

Hi,

We run all our master and media servers on HP PA-RISC server and HP-UX as OS. These servers cost a lot, not only to buy, but also in maintenance.

What do you guys think about going from the above to powerful INTEL server with linux as OS instead in a datacenter environment? 
We have about 200 clients and (all full is about ~15TB, never at one time though) to backup at one of our sites. 

Anyone using this type of solution in DC env`s? Recommendations?? 

Thankful for advice,
MVH / Hampus LindRikspolisstyrelsenNational Police BoardTel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.0 Advanced Client

2006-01-24 Thread Sekhon Simrat S.








Hi! 

Im a newbie with Netbackup 6.0. I wanted to know if Netbackup
Advanced client for Exchange 2003 and SQL is part of Netbackup 6.0 enterprise edition
package or it is a separate licensed add-on. Any information on this would be appreciated.



Thanks,

Simrat 



Simrat
S. Sekhon MCSE

Information Services



VSC
Corporation