Yea, that's the one!
---
W. Curtis Preston
Backup Blog @ www.backupcentral.com
VP Data Protection, GlassHouse Technologies
-Original Message-
From: WEAVER, Simon (external) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 10:45 PM
To: Curtis Preston; Conner, Neil; Justin Piszcz
No probs :-) - I agree, hate to see errors when they are not needed
Regards
Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator
EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Hi Gang,
I am hoping one of the NetBackup/SUN UNIX Guru's might be able to help
here.
We have a strange issue here at the moment. We have created a separate
file system for NetBackup on /opt/openv. The /opt/openv filesystem
filled with logs in the /opt/openv/logs directory. When doing a fsck
Are you using VCS? We have done a lot of cross site clustering with VCS.
One solution is to have a storage unit at each site, and customize the
online and offline scripts to change the policy to point to the correct
storage unit.
Reneé Carlisle
ServerWare Corporation
_
From:
Hi Tal
As long as the DNS (and it's reverse lookup
configuration) is working or a good host files exists,
you also can backup the physical names, although
they're not defined in the bp.conf (or registry).
Just add the physical name(s) to the policy and back
it up (just make sure you don't backup
Clem,
In 6.0 on Solaris, I have seen when the logs fill up that sometimes some
defunct emm database processes stay out there that don't necessarily show
with a bpps -a. I would suggest bringing down all NetBackup services and
then do a ps -ef and look for any netbackup, emm, or defunct
Thanks
I think that could cause a error on the passive node as this is for a
Oracle cluster
I may be able to pull it off if I get the script to check if the db is
running locally and exit if it is not
Thanks Guys
Regards
Tal
-Original Message-
From: Flavio Huerlimann [mailto:[EMAIL
--
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Curtis Preston
Sent: July 25, 2007 1:26 AM
To: Conner, Neil; Justin Piszcz
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Possible to exclude Shadow Copy
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Paul Keating wrote:
--
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Curtis Preston
Sent: July 25, 2007 1:26 AM
To: Conner, Neil; Justin Piszcz
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Possible to
Ed, I 100% agree with what you've said below. For my traditional and
small environment (only about 550 servers), what I've outlined is
extremely useful, especially since it works for both Netbackup and
Backup Exec clients in a similar manner. And no, a single report will
never be able to get you
I believe 6.5 is supposed to have exclusive support for this(?) if I
recall seeing something about it in their 6.5 detail/PDFs.
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Ed Wilts wrote:
The Nexsan SATAbeast has some built in maid-features like parking the heads,
slowing the drive rotation, and powering down a
As everyone is telling you, you need xinetd settings. Not a big deal.
HOWEVER! This install is for linux 2.4 kernel, and RHEL5 is 2.6. Not a
big deal, except the gcc changed. You have to make sure you have all
the gcc 2.96 compatibility packages installed for legacy support.
-Andrew Stueve
We upgraded to 6.0MP4 from 5.1 a little over a month ago. In general I
think it's better than 5.1, but has anyone else noticed that certain
operations take longer? Running vmoprcmd takes 90 seconds on our
systems now whereas it used to take a couple of seconds before. Also,
getting the media
MP4 fixed all of my issues, after that if I had the problem, re-installing
or deleting/re-adding the media server seemed to help. It is hard to
explain but the end result is vmoprcmd timed out and failed, if yours is
working after 30 seconds, then I am not sure what could be causing that.
It
You could also try fuser /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/* and see what process are
being used.
Regards,
Patrick Whelan
VERITAS Certified NetBackup Support Engineer for UNIX.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rcarlisle
Sent: 25 July 2007 13:12
I have a different way of handling that requirement.
---
W. Curtis Preston
Backup Blog @ www.backupcentral.com
VP Data Protection, GlassHouse Technologies
From: Steven L. Sesar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 12:31 PM
To: Curtis
Hi Clem,
Make sure you log a sev 1 with support ASAP if you haven't already.
In the mean time ...
Might be best to apply MP4 to replace the files, I believe most of the lib
ones are in there but make sure they are being updated as one of them is
probably corrupt. Otheriwse grab them
Yes -
It will still work
The jobs will run as user jobs which are prioritised
Regards
Tal
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: 25 July 2007 19:10
To: Greenberg, Katherine (ISD, IT)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
See below.
Incorrect.
If you specify F:\ a the only entry in the backup selection list and it
does not exist, you will get a status 71.
If you specify C:\, D:\ and F:\, and the system has a C and D drive,
but
no F drive, you will not get a failure.
You will if you use multi-streaming because
Shekel, Tal wrote:
Until you have an [x]inetd process running the system wont be able to
listen for bpcd connections
You can start bpcd in standalone mode (bpcd -standalone) on the client
for the time being
Attached original message stripped from forum post
that will be
I noticed there is a bug, in some cases, if NBEMM screws up, vmoprcmd can
take a very long time and possibly time out FYI.
Justin.
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did notice that vmoprcmd does take slightly longer to run, but for me
its only about 15 second difference. It
Have you guys ever used an external scheduler?
I'm trying to figure out if that impacts Policy Prioritization or not.
Since our backups aren't scheduled thru NetBackup (there are schedules,
but no windows) does prioritization come into play or no?
We're running 5.1 MP6.
TIA,
Kate
I did notice that vmoprcmd does take slightly longer to run, but for me
its only about 15 second difference. It appears that running it in 6
generates better formatted output with more info, which may account for
some extra time.
But in general I have noticed that operations in the Java
They aren't user jobs, they are run with bpbackup -i.
-Original Message-
From: Shekel, Tal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 3:26 PM
To: Justin Piszcz; Greenberg, Katherine (ISD, IT)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Priority w/ an
I also agree that things take longer, particularly starting NBConsole on
Windows.
=
Carl Stehman
IT Distributed Services Team
Pepco Holdings, Inc.
202-331-6619
Pager 301-765-2703
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/25/2007 01:50 PM
To
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Greenberg, Katherine (ISD, IT) wrote:
Have you guys ever used an external scheduler?
I'm trying to figure out if that impacts Policy Prioritization or not.
Since our backups aren't scheduled thru NetBackup (there are schedules,
but no windows) does prioritization come
Hi,
I'm new to Nb.
if I need to upgrade my clients to MP4, do I absolutely need to backup my
master server (solaris 9) to MP4 too? or keeping it at mp3 is ok?
Thanks,
Marc-Andre Labelle
+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL
Yes. Other way not supported.
kww
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
malabelle
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 12:31 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Upgrade NB 6.0 MP3 to MP4
Hi,
I'm new to Nb.
if I need
What is the bug and how do we fix it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 1:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Forester, Jack L;
NetBackup List
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.0 -
Has anyone run across this dilemma
The following are connected via F/C switch:
Quantum i2000 Scalar tape library
6 tape drives
IBM RS6000 (Veritas 6.0-mr4 Master server)
The switch is:
IBM TotalStorage San16B-2 (switch)
Problem: no robot ID to use for making ovpass
Quantum provided one
While I agree with Justin's response, I really don't like using external
schedulers for NetBackup unless absolutely necessary. The only real
requirement I can think of that would force me to an external scheduler
is multi-host dependencies, because external schedulers are really good
at that.
Looks like you have your answer
You should also try keep any db agents at the same MP as the master
I have seen issues from this with the Oracle agent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
malabelle
Sent: 25 July 2007 18:31
To:
I had an issue, pre MP4, of the console on Win taking a good while to open.
It started with some MP3 troubles, but MP4 cleared that.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 3:27 PM
To:
33 matches
Mail list logo
