[Veritas-bu] Status 96 media allocation issues

2008-03-17 Thread Jeff Cleverley
Greetings, I saw a post similar to this problem in February, but didn't really see an answer posted. I'm hoping someone can help me out. This is a 5.1 master running NDMP backups. The standard media policy is that they protected the data permanently and then expired the media once the tapes

Re: [Veritas-bu] Lets hear about your upgrade experience! 5.x - 6.5

2008-03-17 Thread Johan Redelinghuys
Hi Good thing you are holding off with the upgrade because of Data Domain. We did the upgrade and everthing worked ok except Data Domain backups. To make a long story short, the problem was on the Data Domain side and it all had to do with permissions - This is was fixed it for us, so let

Re: [Veritas-bu] Status 96 media allocation issues

2008-03-17 Thread Paul Keating
Why would you not set your retentions correctly (ie, set to expire when you want them to) then have Iron Mountain automatically return the tapes when the expiration date rolls 'round? That way your tapes come back to you as Scratch, with no clean up work to do afterward. Sounds like a make work

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.0 MP6 for Linux

2008-03-17 Thread Stumpr
Thanks Ed +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-- ___

Re: [Veritas-bu] Status 96 media allocation issues

2008-03-17 Thread Jeff Cleverley
Paul, As mentioned, I only inherited the environment :-) I was told that the reason this was being done was they wanted to have the tapes and sessions protected until they decided to explicitly unprotect them. I think it stemmed more from paranoia and lack of understanding from the

Re: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.5.1 issue, error 25, jobs fail

2008-03-17 Thread Mike Kiles
The fix may be in 6.5.2, not sure tho. --- S Conn. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thursday, after reboot: bmrbd13040.000%0.078 47M 3/12/08 12:06:44.375 bmrd 14000.000%0.203 11M 3/12/08 12:06:46.843 Friday, having issue: bmrbd

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup sample scripts

2008-03-17 Thread ANIL555
that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you. -- -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20080317/62c94397/attachment-0001.html

Re: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.5.1 issue, error 25, jobs fail

2008-03-17 Thread Jeff Lightner
The fix is ALWAYS in the next release/patch... ...and when you find out after that one becomes available and is installed that it still doesn't work the fix will still be in the next release/patch. Better to try and fix or work around what you have than assume it will be resolved in the next

[Veritas-bu] SQL Server Database Restore

2008-03-17 Thread Julio Duarte de Assis Dezan
Hi All, I'm backing up my SQL servers using Netbackup 5.1 MP6 with SQL Agent. It's working fine but the restores are extremely slow Today I started a 160GB DB restore at 01:00 pm and now is 07:00 pm and it is still working in the restore... I saw the files timestamp and there is no activity

Re: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.5.1 issue, error 25, jobs fail

2008-03-17 Thread Vaikar Amol
Hi, We too had faced this issue and this seems to be a known memory leak issue with bmrbd when the BMR Master server is not configured and bmrbd keeps trying to reach a configured master server. Once the BMR master server is configured, this issue should not be seen. Meanwhile, if turning