I would like to post questions to this forum.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu]on Behalf Of
veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 9:12 AM
To: Erik Robertello
I am looking to eliminate volume pools in an effort to utilized hardware
encryption (limited to 2 volume pools). Is there another way to experience the
same results of using volume pools with using volume pools?
Erik
___
Veritas-bu maillist -
Well including your introduction email with its PASSWORD in place is not
a good start !!!
start with a new message and send to
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
I would change your password !
Simon
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Hi
Is support for ZFS filesystems on Solaris 10 included in
Netbackup Ver 6.0 + MP4 or do I have to go to a higher MP level for
Netbackup?.
Complete Sun Solaris 10 shop hereplanning to move some stuff to ZFS
filesystem wanted to make sure that I can perform the bare minimum
My previous post should have read:
I am looking to eliminate volume pools in an effort to utilized hardware
encryption (limited to 2 volume pools). Is there another way to experience the
same results of using volume pools without using volume pools?
Erik
Is it possible to give the same privleges to a user account as root when
running jnbSA?
I want to run jnbSA as a regular user, but I want the user to have the same
privileges as when I use jnbSA as root, is this possible?
Does anyone do this currently?
If so, can you please explain/show your
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:37:05AM -0500, erik.roberte...@firstinvestors.com
wrote:
My previous post should have read:
I am looking to eliminate volume pools in an effort to utilized
hardware encryption (limited to 2 volume pools). Is there another way
to experience the same results of
Supposing your master runs on unix, you should edit
/usr/openv/java/auth.conf to add:
username ADMIN=ALL JBP=ALL
to have same permissions as the root user.
There's some short list of various values you can provide for JBP part to
limit the user from viewing/doing things. The list is in the
Hello,
can i restore rman backup set not to Oracle instance but to disk?
I can see it with bplist:
r...@bs # /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/bplist -C sf6800b -t 4 -k R_RAC -s
12/17/2008 -l -R /
-rw--- oracleoracle 59244544 Dec 17 08:36
/c-2163887515-20081217-08
-rw--- oracle
I may be missing something, but I believe you need to use RMAN to do the
restore, which assumes an instance or Oracle running on the
system you are restoring to. The netbackup for Oracle manual discusses
how to restore to another system. It expects the Oracle infrastructure
that matches the
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Evsyukov, Sergey wrote:
Hello,
can i restore rman backup set not to Oracle instance but to disk?
I can see it with bplist:
r...@bs # /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/bplist -C sf6800b -t 4 -k R_RAC -s
12/17/2008 -l -R /
-rw--- oracleoracle 59244544 Dec 17 08:36
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Bhangui, Sandeep - BLS CTR wrote:
Hi
Is support for ZFS filesystems on Solaris 10 included in
Netbackup Ver 6.0 + MP4 or do I have to go to a higher MP level for
Netbackup?.
Complete Sun Solaris 10 shop hereplanning to move some stuff to ZFS
filesystem
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Eddy Lim wrote:
Dear friends,
I need guide and documentations for upgrading my netbackup. Currently
using ver 6.0. Every recommendation is highly appreciated.
Best regards,
Eddy Lim
Read the following document very carefully:
Nice definition, should be put in a FAQ :)
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Clausen, Matt R [EQ] wrote:
Here are the basics:
1. Basic Disk Staging
Backup to Disk First then a Destaging schedule duplicates the backup image to
tape media. Once the image is successfully destaged to tape, it is then
We are using approx 15 volume pools for several reasons.
Having many pools allows us to restore different pools simultaneously at our DR
facility, getting the maximum results within our window.
This is also the case for backing up the data. Different media servers having
their own pools is
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:52:29AM -0500, erik.roberte...@firstinvestors.com
wrote:
We are using approx 15 volume pools for several reasons.
Having many pools allows us to restore different pools simultaneously
at our DR facility, getting the maximum results within our window.
I assume it's
My conclusion from my research and emails, there is no need to worry about
those files. All PBX/ICS stuff gets automatically/silently installed when
NetBackup 6.5 is installed and PBX/ICS gets upgraded automatically when
Netbackup is upgraded to 6.5.3.
Thx
--- On Thu, 12/11/08, Mike Kiles
For example, having an exchange pool and a file server pool (and so on) allows
us to back up two very large servers to two different tapes (and drives) at the
same time.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 01:14:34PM -0500, erik.roberte...@firstinvestors.com
wrote:
For example, having an exchange pool and a file server pool (and so
on) allows us to back up two very large servers to two different tapes
(and drives) at the same time.
I don't see why that's true at all.
On point 1, you should do exactly what Darren has already suggested: burn some
extra retention level slots (I encourage you not to change the ones at 9 or
below) on multiple copies of the same actual time of retention. Unless you
change the default configuration (and please, don't), NetBackup
I am sorry I should have clarified, it is not that the speed is slow. It is
more efficient, getting max performance out of our tape drives, restoring
different pools in parallel.
I think what I am really asking, is there anyway to specify certain policies to
be backed up by a specific
Erik, Darren has already suggested a way that you can do that: use redundant
(length-wise) retention levels and use a different one in each of your
policies. That falls down if you need more than 15 slots (or more than one
different duration), but you already asserted that you currently have 15
If you absolutely have to have your email and file backups on different
media then your options are as follows:
1) Use separate volume pools
2) Use separate retentions with the flag turned off to allow multiple
retentions per media
3) Use separate media servers with the flag turned off to allow
One correction to the Basic Disk Staging as we found out is that there are
no settable high water marks for Basic Disk Staging. The hard-coded
maximum is 98% of your basic storage disk. It is my guess this is done so
that you will want to purchase the Shared Disk Option. You can still
HP LTO2 drives can stream from 10-30 MB/sec and IBM drives at 18, 20 and
35 MB/sec. So if he's seeing 6 MB/sec per drive, NONE of these drives
are streaming, which adds to the poor performance. When running w/o MSEO
and getting 60 MB/sec per drive, that's pretty near double the native
transfer
Are you confusing volume pools storage units? I can see hardware
encryption tied to a tape drive set much more than a volume pool.
That said, if you really want to get rid of volume pools, be careful
with data that doesn't live together well. Oracle data oracle
archived redo should live on
OK...here's what I'm looking to do. I have 149 master backup servers. 47 of
them are Netbackup. Each master is a different customer. I'm looking to
automate a Backup Audit Report for Netbackup. It was easy enough to do for
Backup Express and Legato.
I need a post script that will insert the
Really thanks for your recommendation. I think i'm going for the official one
first from the symantec site.
best regards,
Eddy Lim
+--
|This was sent by eddy@asaba.co.id via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to
Hi all,
I have added a new LTO4 drive in SL500 Tape Library with 5 existing LTO3 drive,
I have succesfull to backup LTO3 media with LTO4 drive, but when i did
inventory LTO4 media it's recognized as DLT media not HCART, is anyone know why
this happened? is it necessery to patch the nbu
29 matches
Mail list logo
