You make some good points, Bob.
-Original Message-
From: bob944 [mailto:bob...@attglobal.net]
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 6:47 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Cc: wcplis...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] How to properly calculate the Catalog
That formula in the manual
All
hope I can have some help here. Logged a call 2 days ago with Symantec,
due to the problem with this Server.
NBU 5.1 MP5 Master and 6 SSO SAN Media Servers
1 Particular Server had a problem Thursday night with backup issues. It
was reporting status codes of 41 and 89. Since then, the Full
Guys we have installed an Ultra320 HBA into an E220R in slot1 (66mhz)
and attached dual scsi to an SL24 with 2 half heigh LTO3 drives. 1
Channel per tape drive. Single Master/Media combo
This is all on Solaris 9 with Netbackup 5.0mp7.
I wont go into the details but suffice to say the customer
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Dave Markham wrote:
Guys we have installed an Ultra320 HBA into an E220R in slot1 (66mhz)
and attached dual scsi to an SL24 with 2 half heigh LTO3 drives. 1
Channel per tape drive. Single Master/Media combo
This is all on Solaris 9 with Netbackup 5.0mp7.
I wont go
The need to use FQDNs is, imho, a sign that you don't trust your DNS.
FQDNs are a PITA if you ask me and I would rather take the time to make
something as mission critical as DNS work right instead of hiding the
real problem. To each his own, I've been on contracts before where the
problem was
We have only used short names for all our backups. Geoff's comments are
right on.. Our DNS works fine. The main thing is to be
sure that forward and reverse look-ups work. Netbackup is very fussy
about that.
--
Carl Stehman
Distributed Services
Pepcoholdings,
I have been of the same opinion.
But with the new domains, I cannot install across the domains, so I have
to do some special stuff to get the netbackup files up on the domain to
upgrade those servers.
This is where I am having the issue, so when I do the upgrade I need to
be able to say these
The problem is, if you have multiple sites, DNS is limited (at least in
Linux/glibc) to 6 sub domains, after that, you're going to have problems.
Better off with FQDN IMO.
search Search list for host-name lookup.
The search list is normally determined from the local
Since upgrading our largest NBU environemnts to 6.5.3.1 for the DST scheduler
issue, we've run into another bug. On Sunday, policies that have a window
crossing midnight are submitted again and run for that day's run. Initially,
we thought this to be an issue with DST time change, but it
Ich werde ab 16.03.2009 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
19.03.2009.
Ich werde Ihre Nachrichten nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.
Cortal Consors S.A. Zweigniederlassung Deutschland, Bahnhofstraße 55,
D-90402 Nürnberg, HR Nürnberg B 20075, USt-IdNr. DE225900761
Sitz der Cortal
Here is my policy:
2bppllist: INITIATING: version NetBackup 6.5 created: 2008103023
Policy Name: wat_watna02_ndmp_vol0
Policy Type: NDMP
Active: yes
Effective date: 07/25/2008 00:00:01
Mult.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Stafford, Geoff
gstaff...@barclaycardus.com wrote:
The need to use FQDNs is, imho, a sign that you don’t trust your DNS.
I trust the DNS - I have extensive DNS experience and our company would be
down without a fully functioning DNS infrastructure. Ours
Resolving search lists doesn't mean they have to be configured correctly
everywhere. Just for the server and the client involved in the
current problem. That is to say while it needs to be configured
everywhere to make each client work when their turn comes in the
schedule it is a red herring
Hello-
Without using OST, is there a way to get a physical tape copy from a
deduped/replicated image?
We have a local EDL/3DL replicating (de-duped data) to a remote EDL/3DL. We
need to get a physical tape from the remote copy, but it has to NBU-aware.
Thanks in advance!
14 matches
Mail list logo
