We have Netbackup 6.5 on server and client. Every two to three days log file
have following messages and backup failed:
5:28:42.502 [27407] 16 flush_archive(): ERR - Cannot write to STDOUT. Errno =
104: Connection reset by peer
05:28:42.520 [27407] 16 bpbkar Exit: ERR - bpbkar FATAL
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Sabar Martin Hasiholan Panggabean
sabar.hasiho...@metrodata.co.id wrote:
Does anyone has link/information where to get pdf questions for these exam:
Exam 250-365: Data Protection Administration for Windows using NetBackup
6.5
Exam 250-265: Data
For the policy you want to multi-stream, is the Allow Multiple Streams box
checked in the Policy Attributes?
Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard
Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 ▪
281-584-4693
Keeping People and Information
No, the physical nodes are 1a and 1b, the cluster is vir1. The active node on
the cluster was 1a, then it failed over so the active node was 1b. We then
started getting the 71 error. We are only backing up the shared resource. If I
go to client proterties on the master server, the client name
Are there more then one cluster group.
We found that we would be given a cluster name, but there might be 3 or 4
different groups that could move between the physical nodes.
So we might have vir1 and group2 on node 1a and group3 on node 1b. Which would
then lead to the 71 errors and netbackup
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:48 AM, smwoodcrafts
netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:
No, the physical nodes are 1a and 1b, the cluster is vir1. The active node
on the cluster was 1a, then it failed over so the active node was 1b. We
then started getting the 71 error. We are only backing up
rusty.ma...@sungard.com wrote:
For the policy you want to multi-stream, is the Allow Multiple Streams
box checked in the Policy Attributes?
Yes. I've stopped and started all processes several times just to make
sure all changes are getting loaded also.
Jeff
*Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP,
ewilts wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:48 AM, smwoodcrafts netbackup-forum at
backupcentral.com (netbackup-forum at backupcentral.com) wrote:
The client name set on the host is actually irrelevant - it's only used when
you want to do a restore.
On your Windows cluster, you want
It might be easier, because I'm new to this and probably not explaining it
correctly, to just ask what are the correct steps when configuring for backup
of the floating drives in a cluster. There has to be something I missed. This
would be an all Windows environment and I would need steps on
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:34 AM, smwoodcrafts
netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:
ewilts wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:48 AM, smwoodcrafts netbackup-forum at
backupcentral.com (netbackup-forum at backupcentral.com) wrote:
The client name set on the host is actually
I don't think you are seeing the picture.
Go into your windows server and cluster admin.
Now look at your resources and find the virtual name of the server that owns
that resource.
This is NOT a physical server name.
Example when you go into cluster Administaff Inc.
You see a folder called
I think you mentioned database cluster in an earlier post?
here's how I have my sql cluster set up:
physical node hostnames:
sql1 (192.168.0.1)
sql2 (192.168.0.2)
cluster node hostname:
sqlclus (192.168.0.3)
I have two policies for my sql cluster (well, *I* have more than two, but for
the
You say they are writing to (and you're trying to backup) a floating drive
and that you've defined vir1 in your backups.
Your vir1 must not be in the same Cluster Group as the resources you're
trying to back up.
I'm guessing you're trying to backup the Network Name resource called Cluster
The clients max job was set to 1. I changed it to 10 for now. The
policy with 3 file systems in the includes grabbed 3 drives and started
writing. Performance now needs to start getting tuned to see what we
can get but at least I can use all the drives.
Thanks,
Jeff
Jon Bousselot wrote:
All,
I have a NBU 6.5.3.1 server running AIX. and a STK SL8500 Library with
dual 39-slot caps, driven by ACSLS. Our vault jobs are to the point where
they are consistently more than 78 tapes, and when the deferred ejects are
performed, the remaining x-78 tapes will not eject. We just
We aren't sending that many tapes offsite, but I do have similar issues
with the ACS libraries hanging in eject mode until the cap is emptied and
then closed in an empty state. I really hate this operation, btw, but we
utilize the eject notification to email the operators to inform them they
No, they are right on it, because they initiate the eject with the
deferred eject. What happens is the vault runs and does all of its dupes
and the finishes without ejecting anything. When they notice the vault is
done, they expand out Vault Management down to the job itself and right
click
I just checked with the owner. Everything is in the same cluster group. I did
find out that F: resides on our SAN. It's not physically in one of the servers.
Ownership changes with a failover the the newly active node.
Any more ideas?
It's clear I'm not understanding this.
Cannot send screen shots via this mail group.
Send me your email address and I will try to do screen shots to 'show'
you what we are talking about.
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
I'll take a stab at it: Don't think drives think groups
Remember that Windows Cluster drives do not float around on their own- they
are part of a Cluster Group. That group also includes IP addresses- you can
and should have a dedicated backup IP address for each Cluster Group that
resolves
I only have experience with SCSI-controlled TLD and TL8 libraries, but this
might be useful...
Try ejecting a large batch of tapes manually and see how it behaves when the
cap fills:
vmchange -multi_eject -w -res -ml $EJECT_LIST -rt $ROBOT_TYPE \
-rn $ROBOT_NUM -rh $ROBOT_HOST
You can
I am looking for brief steps to add a brand new server to existing Netbackup
6.5.3 environment, all windows 2003 servers.
Thanks.
__
The new Internet Explorer® 8 - Faster, safer, easier. Optimized for Yahoo!
Get it Now
22 matches
Mail list logo
