Title: Message
Will check on that, thanks.
From: WEAVER, Simon
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005
10:23 AM
To: Piszcz, Justin;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Which
backups ran on tape L00123?
Justin
If the tape is
I think you want this dont you ?
bpimmedia -mediaid BQ630D |awk ' $1 ~ /IMAGE/ {print $0}'
This should list the client images which are on that tape. These may not
be complete images if the tape is multiplexed or backups have span
media. Taking of the awk statement will show you all frags.
What do you guys think about this?
I can eject the tape, lock it manually (on the cartridge), so it cannot
be written to, then, when it expires according to its retention period I
will remove the bad tape.
CommentS?
Justin.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL
Thanks, this works.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 10:59 AM
To: Piszcz, Justin
Cc: Steven Cashman; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Which backups ran on tape L00123?
I think you want this dont
Steve,
I will put it back in re-inventory but the tape itself would be
locked, that should not cause any issues, should it?
Justin.
-Original Message-
From: Steven Cashman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 11:04 AM
To: Piszcz, Justin; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
If the tape isn't ful, you'll get jobs trying to write to it, failing
because the cart is write protected, then restarting.
If that's ok with you, then go for itI'd suspend it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Piszcz, Justin
Yes, the file does have spaces, the name of the file is Who Has Access
to CoC_Shr.txt. What I had done originally was to rename the original
to Who Has Access to CoC_Shr-Backup.txt which cause the backup to not
restore anything. When I changed the file to Backup-Who Has Access to
CoC_Shr.txt the
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 09:22:40AM -0500, Bobby R Windle wrote:
Does anyone know if Netbackup 50 or 60 will run under Solaris10 fully
supported by Veritas?
According to this: http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/275107.htm,
you've got this level of support:
1) Sun Solaris 10 support*
Justin
I had to do this when importing LTO1 Tapes into a new NBU Database
(Painful story!!) but yes, this ensures its not over-written! However,
the BAD side is this..
IF the tape expires, it goes into scratch... A job will grab the tape
and try to write!
NO NO NO! You cannot write to me
According to this: http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/275107.htm,
you've got this level of support:
1) Sun Solaris 10 support* begins with NetBackup 5.0 Maintenance Pack 4
and NetBackup 5.1 Maintenance Pack 2 as follows:
Version RequiredHardware NBU Support
* Ed Wilts [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-12-09 11:41]:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 09:22:40AM -0500, Bobby R Windle wrote:
Does anyone know if Netbackup 50 or 60 will run under Solaris10 fully
supported by Veritas?
According to this: http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/275107.htm,
you've got
Im testing VxSS (Veritas Security Services) 4.1.2.7
in a lab environment. Ive got the master / media server running
NetBackup 5.1MP3.
Following the VxSS docs, I installed Java 1.4.2.10, perl
5.8.
My environment is as follows:
# echo $PATH
Title: Message
good
luck.
we had
a consultant in from our veritas var, who worked for 2 months with his support
reps, and veritasended up dumping it.
from
what I've seen it's not worth the headaches.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
--- Chapman, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, the file does have spaces, the name of the file
is Who Has Access
to CoC_Shr.txt. What I had done originally was to
rename the original
to Who Has Access to CoC_Shr-Backup.txt which
cause the backup to not
restore anything. When I
We're starting the process of building out another data center as a
disaster recovery facility. One of the things I don't yet know how to
configure is NetBackup. We've got a single Solaris master server today
and will obviously be putting a Solaris backup server at the DR site.
We will also have
We have are a small company.
We only have 1 Master Server with 14
clients. Our master server runs on Solaris.
This is what we do for our cold dr process(no
available hardware) and our warm dr process(availible hardware).
Protecting the server
==
Solaris allows you to create an
I've been crawling the NDMP manual for an hour but haven't found a
black-and-white answer yet.
I have a number of Netapp Filers and we're looking at implementing NDMP
backups (we currently just backup NFS mounts). I know I cannot share a set
of drives between my NDMP hosts my other media
EdI haven't played with NBU clustering but it sounds like an interesting option.To promote the media server to a master,
you'd effectively have to rename the server to the master's name and
recover the catalog. You'd lose any mediadb info from the media server, but you would still be able to
18 matches
Mail list logo
