Re: [Veritas-bu] netbackup server + acsls, SSI port problems connecting error code 72 (status pendin

2005-12-19 Thread Scott Jacobson
Chris Try adding to your Media Server "vm.conf" file: ACS_TCP_RPCSERVICEACS_SSI_HOSTNAME = media_server.your.domain.comACS_SSI_SOCKET = media_server.your.domain.com 13741 Scott "Donovan, Chris" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/18/2005 8:26 pm Hiyas,I have been trying to get netbackup to talk to acsls for

RE: [Veritas-bu] Schedule backup in minutes rather than hours

2005-12-19 Thread Bob Stump
You will need to do this via the command line using bpplsched - check out the man page. -freq frequency Determines how often backups run. Represents the number of seconds between backups initiated according to this schedule. Valid range

RE: [Veritas-bu] bpstart behaviour

2005-12-19 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Dave The Command bpplsched might be of some help to you, although depends on how far you want to go with it :-) Simon Weaver Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Tel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dave Markham

Re: [Veritas-bu] bpstart behaviour

2005-12-19 Thread Dave Markham
Are you thinking for me to modify a schedule on the fly or something? Will this not affect all clients in the policy? Ill read the man page see if anything jumps out :) Cheers WEAVER, Simon wrote: Dave The Command bpplsched might be of some help to you, although depends on how far you want

RE: [Veritas-bu] bpstart behaviour

2005-12-19 Thread WEAVER, Simon
H I did not see an option on client base - only policy basis for this command :( Simon Weaver Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Tel: 02392-708598 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19

[Veritas-bu] slow catalog backups with 5.1

2005-12-19 Thread Tschida, Tom \(C\)\(STP\)
We've recently upgraded our environment to 5.1 MP 4, and I've noticed that our catalog backup has slowed byover 30%. Has anyone seen similar things with 5.1? Thanks, Tom Tschida Guidant Corp

RE: [Veritas-bu] Media Experation

2005-12-19 Thread WEAVER, Simon
By the way, you could use bpexpdate -m mediaID -d 0 if you want to force netbackup to move the tapes into SCRATCH, assuming that has been configured and the tapes have no images on there that are needed! HTH Simon Weaver Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Tel:

RE: [Veritas-bu] Media Experation

2005-12-19 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Hello Martin Something to check. In 5.1, goto the Policies and expand this. Choose a policy , double click (if your windows) and goto the Schedules Tab). Double click on the schedule and there will be a section called RETENTION - this should show what the retention is set for within this

RE: [Veritas-bu] slow catalog backups with 5.1

2005-12-19 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message Tom How large is the catalogue backup when you view it in Activity Monitor? I use 5.1 and time wise, it depends on the size of the catalogue mainly. Are you seeing any other slowness with the backups itself? Simon WeaverTechnical SupportWindows Domain Administrator

RE: [Veritas-bu] Media Experation

2005-12-19 Thread Martin, Jonathan \(Contractor\)
I run two scripts to expire media. First I run the bpexpdate -m ## -d o which does work sometimes. I found through trial and error that this will not only reassign the media to scratch, but also wipes the catalog of any information about that media. If that doesn't work, I then have to

RE: [Veritas-bu] Media Experation

2005-12-19 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Jonathan Yes it will, because you are forcing an expire of that tape - if the auto way is left to Netbackup, it is essentially doing the same thing (ie: 1 tape has a retention of 1 week and after this time, its put back into Scratch ready for Netbackup to use). HTH Simon Weaver Technical

RE: [Veritas-bu] slow catalog backups with 5.1

2005-12-19 Thread Tschida, Tom \(C\)\(STP\)
Title: Message Our catalogue is 248 GB. I upgraded on Thursday. On Friday I noticed the elapsed time for the catalogue was over 9 hours. In looking through the Activity monitor, prior to the upgrade it finished in just under 7 hours for roughly the same size catalogue. I haven't notices a

[Veritas-bu] RE: 4.5 FP9

2005-12-19 Thread Michal Kadari Langber
Title: RE: 4.5 FP9 Hi, I'm running NBU 4.5 FP6 , We just got a recommendation from Symantec to upgrade to FP9. has anyone running this version? does it have any major problems? Thanks, Michal Kadari Unix Backup Admin. Cellcom LTD. Israel

RE: [Veritas-bu] Media Experation

2005-12-19 Thread Williams, Kristopher L
I'm fairly sure that a tape has to be pulled from the scratch pool before it will be returned to the scratch pool. So if you added tapes and added them to a pool other than scratch, they won't be moved to Scratch once the are expired. They will just stay in the original pool. I guess the best

RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Client in a cluster?

2005-12-19 Thread Paul Keating
Title: Message you install the client on the two individual physical machines as if they were two separate non-clustered clients. then you can run backups against any shared resource that flops between the two physical nodes. Paul -Original Message-From: [EMAIL

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup Client in a cluster?

2005-12-19 Thread Barber, Layne \(Contractor\)
How do you in stall NBU CLIENT as a resource in an M$ cluster?

[Veritas-bu] NetBackup Cluster

2005-12-19 Thread Harry Tirrell
Does NetBackup 6.0 support an active/active cluster? Thanks in Advance Harry