Title: Message
Hi
Could I get
clarification? If I ran a Month end backup with a 1 year retention, but it
accidently directed into a wrong volume pool, am I right in saying it cannot be
moved?
I thought if you
deassigned a media ID from a volume, Netbackup would forget about it and treat
I don't think you can change volume pools of a tape if it has images on
it. It normally needs to be expired first, which of course will mean it
can be re-used.
Dave
WEAVER, Simon wrote:
Hi
Could I get clarification? If I ran a Month end backup with a 1 year
retention, but it accidently
I have asked this question twice before with no answers so I thought I'd try
again.
How can I tell why a restore job is queued? I submit restore jobs and they sit
in the queue forever. There are plenty of tape drives, the necessary tape is in
the library. There are no pending mount requests. A
Yes.
We have both SCSI wired as well as FC and both perform quite well.
We used to use 4.5 until our recent 5.1 upgrade.
They have been working fine for us.
hth
Cheers!
--Chris
Hi all,
Anybody tested using LTO3 in Netbackup 4.5 with MP5??
Thanks.
-Song
*/WEAVER, Simon
Dave
That is EXACTLY what I told them!! (people who know better!!)
Sure this was the case, but my understanding is this:
1) When a Media ID (or volume if you want to call it that) is assigned to a
Volume Pool, its stuck there
2) The Volume will STAY here until its expired or manually expired or
Patrick
Ok well 2 reasons I can think of is..
1) the Media is looking for a different TYPE of Tape Drive
2) the Media is waiting for a response from the Storage device used that
performed the backup in the 1st place!
Has anything changed in terms of config since that backup was carried
Hi Chris
Thanks for the clarification, would you also kindly advise what FP or MP you
ran?
Simon Weaver
Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator
EADS Astrium
Tel: 02392-708598
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Jay Manders [mailto:[EMAIL
Ah.
We move *slow*, unless there are enhancement needs or security issues,
so we have used pretty much each and every single MP (we are on the MP
track) 'known to man' that is between our current revision and base 3.4
where we started. Until 5.0 we used the FP track. We do stay up to date
Well, it can be de-assigned and reassigned.
but you may get problems with error code 94's
How to do it? Check out the how to fix error code 94's
Media Manager error 94: Volume not in specified pool - scenarios and
solutions
http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/247898.htm
personally, I would
Bob
No don't want to follow this doc really - and to be honest the tape will
have a retention of 1 year - its not going to kill anyone if it sits in this
pool!
At the end of the day, Netbackup will know about it and when the media is
needed, put it into the pool it came from!
Simon Weaver
The restore log itself isn't telling you anything?
Typically I see things like:
Restore started 03/04/2006 07:11:38
07:11:43 (109902.xxx) Restore job id 109902 will require 3 images.
07:11:43 (109902.xxx) Media id SU0188 is needed for the restore.
07:11:43 (109902.xxx) Media id SU1532 is
What are you all doing for Disk-to-disk backups?
I'm getting a chance to redesign some infrastructure and Disk-to-disk might
play an expanding role.
Currently we keep about 5TB on disk as a primary backup media, simply
writing to a large NFS chunk. We stage another TB or so to disk now but
only
I have the same type of problem restoring on the mailserver. It has
millions of files. If restore selected files and directories with xbp is
used, the restore will queue for a hour or more before starting. If
the restore is sent with restore search directory it starts immediatly.
Carl Mathews
I was trying to figure out why my recently implemented backups of an
Exchange server did not occur over the weekend. I made sure that the
Policies were active - yes. I checked the schedule to be valid - yes.
The Information Store policy had a job priority of 1; I've upped it to 4
(like some
I don't recognize the command. What version are you running.
I'd look ahead with this:
bpschedreq:
-terminate -jobid jobid
-suspend -jobid jobid
[-M master_server,...,master_server]
-tables
-read_stunits
-read_stu_config
-predict datetime [-L]
-verbose level
Bpschedreq is there. Tried the following:
D:\Program Files\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin\admincmdbpschedreq.exe -M calvin
-predict 03/06/2006
With different time stamps.
Here's what my schedule contains: a differential-incremental and full
backup of the Exchange mailboxes. The differential should
What's your policy look like: bppllist policyname -U, and when did it
last run?
-M
-Original Message-
From: Brooks, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 2:21 PM
To: Brooks, Jason; Donaldson, Mark - Broomfield, CO;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE:
One thing to remember, many libraries require that the library and not the
application software do the tape drive cleaning.
We have that with our sun(aka stk) acls controlled library and our ibm 3584
library with the alms feature.
len
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monte
But why bother?? That's a lot of effort to move tapes - they may as well
stay where they are, and increase the expiry time :-)
I just wanted to be sure there was no easy method to do this!
Thanks
Simon Weaver
Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator
EADS Astrium
Tel:
19 matches
Mail list logo