Title: Message
Guys
Still not fully convinced my problems are fully resolved now (go
one step forward, 2 steps back!)
Done a full backup, that completed with NO
problems.
Ran an Cumulative_Incr and found 2 streams still running, for the
past 2 hours.
Its clearly working as the amount of KB
Title: Message
I've just double checked, on a machine that
conveniently failed it's backups last night.. :-)
The job in question was a single stream of a multi
stream backup, which had failed with an error 156. Thejob was "Done", not
suspended.The window closed at 6am this morning.
Title: Message
If the policy fails to work (and all settings look
correct and the same), then I would start by removing clients and re-adding
them.
Its not easy to identify a corrupt policy - the only way I have
personally found to get around the issue is to create a new one. You could also
Title: Message
Ah I see - ok so MAYBE, if a job initially fails
with 196 (backup window closed), and you attempt to re-run, it may automatically
fail again.
Now this is interesting, because another site that
uses the method you described complained the job re-launched but got 196
$ sudo /usr/openv/volmgr/bin/tpconfig -d
EMM interface initialization failed, status = 77
Anyone know what may be wrong here?
Also have a ticket open with Symantec..
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
$ sudo ./nbemmcmd -getemmserver
NBEMMCMD, Version:6.0MP2(20060307)
Library Initialization failed.
CORBA communication error (195)
Command did not complete successfully.
:(
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Not my day.
10:11:01.420 [19750] 2 vnet_version_accept: vnetd.c.1133:
Not my day.
10:11:01.420 [19750] 2 vnet_version_accept: vnetd.c.1133:
*actual_version: 4 0x0004
10:11:01.452 [19750] 2 ProcessRequests: vnetd.c.336: msg: Request
VN_REQUEST_SERVICE_SOCKET(6)
10:11:01.452 [19750] 2 process_service_socket: vnetd.c.1515:
service_name: vmd
10:11:05.492 [19750]
Justin
Your right Not your day !!
http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/282741.htm
I wonder if its worth placing a call with Support if you are continually
getting problems?
Other than that, can you REVERT back to your previous version and restore
your catalog (assuming this is an option) ?
What option turns this off?
Under NB 6.0MP2.
-rw-rw-r--1 root root 72 Jun 13 04:00
51216-127-2198478612-060613-00.log
-rw-rw-r--1 root root 72 Jun 13 03:55
51216-127-8323328-060613-00.log
-rw-rw-r--1 root root 185359 Jun 14
It is an upgrade.
Getting this again.
04:29:11.455 [8891] 16 emmlib_initializeEx: (-) Failed to resolve EMM
server reference
04:29:16.456 [8891] 16 vmd: EMM interface initialization failed, status
= 195
This is a nightmare.
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, WEAVER, Simon wrote:
Justin
If this is NOT
Yeah, I am going back to 5.1 for now.
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, WEAVER, Simon wrote:
Justin
Your right Not your day !!
http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/282741.htm
I wonder if its worth placing a call with Support if you are continually
getting problems?
Other than that, can you
It kinds of worries me that the upgrade to 6.0 from a previous version does
seem to be flakey!
Regards
Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator
EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
Title: Message
Make
sure you have a reasonable frgament size configured.
if you
have frag size set to "infinite", there will be no checkpoints taken, from what
I understand, and have experienced.
In my
testing, what I have seen is that, if you set the checkpoint time to say 15
minutes, it
Title: Message
The
job PID was started as "scheduled" and within the start windowyou're just
re-starting an existing job, which is not the same as manually starting a
job.
Paul
--
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Title: Message
That is precisely the error I am getting. Sorry I
wasn't more descriptive. I've got a remote site with about 3 TB to backup
which takes about 40 hours on their hardware. The window opens Friday
night, and runs through Saturday. Now if that looong job fails because
tape #3
Hopefully and easy one, but I've been unable to verify as of yet.
I'm working on backing up a pair of Linux boxes through a Cisco Load
Balancer. I've worked with our Networking group and have the bare
essentials to get things working. We've opened up 13724 to the virtual
IP for both the Master
Yep, vnetd has been running fine and happy since October, last year.
We'll give that a whirl.
Thanks,
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dave Markham
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 10:16 AM
To: Brooks, Jason
Cc:
Assuming you have enabled VNETD correctly which i assume you have with
having port 137824 open, try opening 13782 also.
Cheers
Brooks, Jason wrote:
Hopefully and easy one, but I've been unable to verify as of yet.
I'm working on backing up a pair of Linux boxes through a Cisco Load
Balancer.
trying to upgrade a windows 2003 master to 6.0, but the installation never completes, it always rolls back at the end. Any ideas?
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Support had me stop Netbackup and remove the file and then start
Netbackup. I was told it would recreate that pempersist file. It did
recreate the file but did not help get my fulls to run. I was using
nbpemreq -predict -date XX/XX/ XX:XX:XX with different dates and
times to try and
Good day,
We are upgrading our Netbackup 4.5 to version 6 and I am looking
into getting some feedback or the positive points for going to
version 6 or what extrra or better features that is offered with version 6.
Thank You
Luc Lamer
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Well, that didn't quite do the trick. So, I've opened a case after
additionally opening 1556, both tcp and udp.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Brooks, Jason
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 10:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've got a requirement to backup a bunch of machines in a non-routable
network (192.168.0.0/24).
rather than put a standalone master there, I wanted to bridge one of my
media servers (not my master) on that net.
for instancehope you don't mind the ascii art:
Master ServerMedia
23 matches
Mail list logo
