Hi all,
We are using NB 6.0-MP3. I would like to be emailed alerts if my SSO Drives are
not accessible by my SAN Media Servers. Is this possible ? And how ?
Cheers
-aW
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Hi,
you could run vmoprcmd and grep through it for the drive and its control - if
it is not accessible there should be an errorcode returned.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Wilkinson, Alex
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. November 2006
Title: Message
Hi
All,
I have NetApp
Fas3020c device. We are backing up its files via CIFS share on the windows
systems. There is no problem backing up. However, during the restore process, we
are taking the following error. Is there anyone with an idea on the head? I
would appreciate any
vmdareq -a
Will produce all SSO drives state rather than a separate vmoprcmd per media
server. Then incorporate the output into a mail of your choice.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schindelasch,
Frerk
Sent: 02 November 2006
Title: Message
It look like a security issue to me.
Can It be that there is read access on the share so backup
can work, but no write/change access for restore configured?
Regards
Martin
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Asiye
YigitGesendet: Donnerstag, 2.
I would check the share permissons, in windows 2003 the default share
permission is read.
Regards
Michael
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 12:23:05 +0200, Asiye Yiðit wrote
Hi All,
I have NetApp Fas3020c device. We are backing up its files via CIFS share
on the windows systems. There is no problem
Has anyone seen this before?
Netbackup 5.0 mp3 Solaris9 connected to L700 via fibre.
I have a network client on a 100Mb network which is beyond slow backing
up. Looking at the gui ( i know not accurate ) details for a job shows
like 127kb/s.
Doing an scp of a 128mb file from master server to
Title: Message
Hi
All,
Do
you know that which process is responsible for writing the files to the
location. I wonder if it is nb client process or not. Do I need to give
write/change writes to the NB client process or to another process?
Although, there is a no read permission to that
In my experience in your scenario almost always boils down to
Auto-negotiate somewhere along the line.
Try using bpbkar on the client writing the same data as to be backed up
to a null device , this way you can determine without network, tape
,blah blah.
That the bpbkar process is in actual fact
Title: Message
I haveone master/media server with four drives;
currently two drives are dedicatedas ndmp; With NBU 6 can I now share
these drives without having to purchase the SSO license; I am under the
impression that the SSO option is only if you wish to share the drives
among different
Title: Message
It would still be the NB tar process
Dave
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Asiye
YigitSent: 02 November 2006 13:14To: Falk, Martin
SZ/HZA-ITDS2Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject:
Re: [Veritas-bu] Unable to restore CIFS share files
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Dave Markham wrote:
Has anyone seen this before?
Netbackup 5.0 mp3 Solaris9 connected to L700 via fibre.
I have a network client on a 100Mb network which is beyond slow backing
up. Looking at the gui ( i know not accurate ) details for a job shows
like 127kb/s.
good morning. We now have the need to upgrade the MP on 5.1 to support SQL
2005. I cannot find any information on symnatec/veritas website as to what
the MP5 corrects and what it may break. We are running the master on HPUX.
I'm not so sure I'm ready to do the upgrade from MP3 to MP5 for one
I'm with David on this. You changed it on the server but did the
associated switch port get changed as well? Both sides should be hard
set to 100 Full.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clooney,
David
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006
yeah all stuff set at 100 full auto neg off.
Strange
WEAVER, Simon wrote:
What is the switch set at? That needs to be verified with the Network bods
in your business
Try changing the Network cable - sounds daft, but one step I would perform!
Regards
Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical
And the cable? Did you replace it?
Just a thought
Regards
Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator
EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Dave Markham [mailto:[EMAIL
Title: Message
In my
experience, you'll get a lot of errors during backup if you don't have write
enabled for "system".
probelms setting archive bits, etc.
However, it does look like a permissioning error.
Paul
--
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check the status of the NIC before just setting it to FULL.Maybe it was FULL to
begin with and you're just looking at a RedHerring.
Check for CRC errors and link status on the client NIC, server NIC, andevery
switch/router port in between.
If some device is misconfigured, start a BIG ftp, and
Did you try using bpbkar to a null device on the client , might be you
client after all ??
You might have a coffe grinder inside the client :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Markham
Sent: 02 November 2006 14:59
To: WEAVER, Simon
Cant find a technote on it.only find the windows one. Just been busy on
something else. Gonna have to man bpbkar and work it out
Clooney, David wrote:
Did you try using bpbkar to a null device on the client , might be you
client after all ??
You might have a coffe grinder inside the
Title: Message
This did the trick thanks
Matthew Johnson
Entertainment Partners
Backup Administrator
Work - 818-955-6357
Cell - 805-914-4791
From: WEAVER, Simon
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006
6:34 AM
To: 'Martin, Jonathan
Does the traceroute from master - client and client - master show the same path.
If yes then its really complex, if no then check whethther any segment
in between has been a victim of broadcast or huge data transfer.
There is Symantec tool provided by support, run and send the output to
support,
Title: Message
Was that max jobs per client in host
global attributes ?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Matthew Johnson
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006
12:04 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon; Martin,
Jonathan (Contractor); NB List Mail
Subject: Re:
Folks,
I would like to hear your experiences or better yet comparison of McData
Sphereon 4700 with Brocade Silkworm 4100 4Gb switches.
CurrentIy our environment is
2 SUN media servers, STK L700, SL500 at one location, connected via 2 STK
StoreNet 4100 ( re-branded 1Gb Brocade SilkWorm 2800 )
We are a mcdata shop today. We have never had any problems with there
directors or there switches (we have the Sphereon 4700 as well). I am very
please with mcdata...
The problem for us today is that we really need to replace our directors and
edge switches and with the upcoming merge of the two
25 matches
Mail list logo
