Re: [Veritas-bu] Disk Staging phase II concurrent drives number

2007-05-07 Thread Marianne Van Den Berg
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/280398.htm Marianne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 May 2007 23:34 To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Re: Disk Staging phase II concurrent

Re: [Veritas-bu] Problem deassigning meda

2007-05-07 Thread Preston, Douglas L
The media still shows up in media list in the NBConsole after running the following commands. I guess it is time to open a support ticket with Symantec. G:\PROGRA~1\VERITAS\NETBAC~1\bin\Admincmdbpmedialist -m L00162 requested media id was not found in the EMM database

Re: [Veritas-bu] Hardware Recommendations for new setup

2007-05-07 Thread Paul Keating
Will it be a master/media, or just a media with the Master at your Main site? Makes a bit of a diff, since a Master will have much more IO to the local catalog. With that much data, I would have no problem going with the T2000 with the 4 disks. Create a RAID10 RG, and cut it up into slices for OS

[Veritas-bu] host name changes

2007-05-07 Thread Shashi Kanth Boddula
Hi, Initially i installed NetBackup 6 in Linux which act as a both master and media server, at that time i have a static IP that resolves to a particular host name, now my problem is, that particular IP got a new name in my DNS records, and my Linux OS is configured with new host name. In

Re: [Veritas-bu] host name changes

2007-05-07 Thread Justin Piszcz
Ouch. You need to keep the same hostname, period-- there may be a 'hack' around that but you really want to keep the same hostname. Justin. On Mon, 7 May 2007, Shashi Kanth Boddula wrote: Hi, Initially i installed NetBackup 6 in Linux which act as a both master and media server, at that

Re: [Veritas-bu] host name changes

2007-05-07 Thread Jeff Lightner
If issue is just a new host on old IP you should be able to add a new record to DNS (or /etc/hosts) that points the name to the new IP. NetBackup doesn't store IPs - it does a lookup by name. In DNS you can use PTR records to associate alternate names to existing hosts. In /etc/hosts you can

Re: [Veritas-bu] host name changes

2007-05-07 Thread Paul Keating
Bring up your NIC(s) with different IP/names. Makes sure files is before DNS/NIS in your nsswitch.conf Make sure the old name resoves to one of the box's IPs via your local hosts file, and there should be no reason to ever change the name in your catalog. Changing the name is unsupported. Paul

[Veritas-bu] Re: Tuning Solaris 10 for NetBackup Media Server

2007-05-07 Thread Chris_Millet
How are you aggregating those 6 gigE links? Sun trunking? Heck, if there is that much power I'd consider adding more links to our T2000 backup servers for more throughput. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

[Veritas-bu] nbsl won't start plus (worthless Symantec support)

2007-05-07 Thread Rajmund Siwik
Hi All, First of all I need to say Symantec/Veritas support is just so bad words can describe it :-( Absolutely worthless. /flame off My setup: NBU 6MP4 on Linux RHEL4U4. About a month ago nbsl daemon decided to stop working. Restarting NB, rebooting server did not help. It

[Veritas-bu] Re: Tuning Solaris 10 for NetBackup Media Server

2007-05-07 Thread sauderd
The four onboard NICs as well as an extra 2-port NIC we installed are all GLDv3 devices. So, they take advantage of the new dladm command to do link aggregation. We had the networking guys configure the 6 ports on the Cisco switch (LACP protocol) and then we did the aggregation as follows:

Re: [Veritas-bu] nbsl won't start plus (worthless Symantec support)

2007-05-07 Thread Dmitri Smirnov
Could be an issue with COBRA (this one is using it) and VxSS. I've had a simular case, almost reinstalled PBX and VxSS. Found actual problem related to configuration in one of VxSS subsystems. You may try to play with /var/openv/var/*.ior files as well (move them to diff. directory and try to

Re: [Veritas-bu] Hardware Recommendations for new setup

2007-05-07 Thread Joe Royer
Actually, I have noticed that most internal RAID controllers tend to be pretty brain dead when it comes to RAID-10 (actually RAID 0+1), doing a round-robin read down both paths which results in *slower* I/O than a single disk (in a 4-disk RAID-10 anyway). I actually did a head-to-head

Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP and encryption

2007-05-07 Thread Adams, Dwayne
Hello, What are the available options for encrypting your NDMP backups on tape? I am using Netbackup 6.0 MP4 Dwayne Adams ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP and encryption

2007-05-07 Thread Paul Keating
The Decru/Netapp product is apparantly quite good. I'd bet the support matrix is pretty tight if you're using Netapp filers, also. Paul -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adams, Dwayne Sent: May 7, 2007

Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP and encryption

2007-05-07 Thread Len Boyle
The only methods that I know of are to do the encrypting in hardware. You can use an external box inserted between the NDMP device and the tape drive. For example a DECRU box now owned by netapp. There are others. Or you can do it in the tape drive. The latest stk (sun) and ibm tape drives

Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP and encryption

2007-05-07 Thread Ed Wilts
Yup, the Decru appliances are quite good. We’ve been quite happy with ours. Support, the rare times we’ve needed it, has been excellent. …/Ed Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I GoodSearch for Bundles Of Love

[Veritas-bu] Restarting restore before expiration

2007-05-07 Thread Jeff Cleverley
Greetings, I am running 5.1 mp2 on hpux 11.11. When I did a restore the other day, it finished with a status code 1. The restore log showed no obvious errors, nor did the bptm logs. When I looked at the job details from the monitor window, it didn't show anything other than a warning that

[Veritas-bu] Backing Up Network Drives in Win2003

2007-05-07 Thread JAJA (Jamie Jamison)
Due to some problems with the NDMP implementation in our NAS head I'm forced (temporarily I hope) to back up NAS volumes by mounting them on a server and creating a policy that allows metwork drives to be backed up. On UNIX this works just fine, NFS mount the volumes, set up the policy and watch