[Veritas-bu] restore failed to recover the requested files

I am using netbackup 6.0 . When I tried to recover one folder , it has failed with following error message --- 04:04:04 (5445.001) Status of restore from image created Sat 06 Oct

Re: [Veritas-bu] restore failed to recover the requested files

Curious, does it work if you restore the same data from the master server using jnbSA? Justin. On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, prashant dabre wrote: I am using netbackup 6.0 . When I tried to recover one folder , it has failed with following error message

[Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 for VMware - Failed to get VM Server Info List

Hi, After installing the new NetBackup 6.5 VMware integration, the configuration failed to get the VM Server List. The VMware Proxy server is installed with the VCB 1.0.3 framework and another server with Virtual Center 2.0.2. Any idea what could be wrong? Michael

[Veritas-bu] restore failed to recover the requested files

Hi Justin, Thanks for your reply. I have tried to restore the backup on master server. it has successfully restored. +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Veritas-bu] SSO slower than network issue

Guys i just added a SAN Media server to my configuration and am doing a test backup after some initial problems. Its working but im getting like 2382 KB/s ( just going off the gui for the moment as iostat -xnd 2 10 |grep rmt on solaris 10 doesnt look to me working like it does on sol 8/9.

[Veritas-bu] Flashbackup-windows restore giving status 13

Hello We're in the testing flashbackup-windows, when trying to restore a drive to an alternate client and alternate location we status 13 Haven't been able to see anything in the logs, ideas/suggestions will appriecated Regards Michael ___ Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] NOM Admin password change issue

When I was installing NOM, I entered a new admin password, but it apparently did not take. I tried following the instructions to change the password on Windows and it says to open the Symantec Product Authentication Services GUI, when I try to run the GUI from start programs, it just never

[Veritas-bu] Novell Non-Target browser

Does anyone know how the list of systems to connect to gets populated in the Novell non-target browser? Thanks Reneé Carlisle ServerWare Corporation ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

[Veritas-bu] BMR boot server on Solaris

Hi all, I am new to BMR and trying to load up a boot server on a Solaris platform. The BMR documentation says that bootp, NFS, and tftp is required on all Unix Boot servers, but Solaris does not support bootp. I have tftp turned on, is that all I really need? If I do need bootp, how do I enable

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 for VMware - Failed to get VM ServerInfo List

Is Vmware tools loaded on all your vm's? Reneé Carlisle ServerWare Corporation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of frankm Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 4:29 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu]

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 for VMware - Failed to get VM ServerInfo List

Look in the GUI option in increase the timeout for vmware. Change it to 500. Vmware is working on improving getting VM Server List. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of frankm Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 3:29 AM To:

Re: [Veritas-bu] SSO slower than network issue

By putting SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS and NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS in /usr/openv/netbackup/db/config i have managed to increase the speed to ~ 11-13MB/s but thats more like 100Mbit network connection speeds and not throughput you'd expect over a 2GB HBA. We have another media server same setup which gets like

[Veritas-bu] Scripting Tape Expiration on Windows

All, I've been slowly working on a VB script set that will automate many of our tape import/export functions. The piece I was working on yesterday was expiring tapes coming back in to the NBU environment (NB 6.5 on Windows 2K3). All works well, but I want to capture any errors bpexpdate

Re: [Veritas-bu] Problems with network speed (NBU 6.0MP4)

This would be my first guess as well - port speed mismatch and autonegotiating to 100MB/sec. the other thing is, are you sure that the network is the bottleneck? For instance, if the server is IO/CPU/memory-bound, you may not pass as much traffic as you expect to see. Jeff Lightner wrote:

[Veritas-bu] Windows default maximum block size ... 64KB still ?

Hi all is the default maximum block size for I/O transfers on windows still only 64KB ? If so, is this possible to change ? And is it bad practice on windows hosts to change the block size ? Context: We need to seriously look at tuning for LTO{2,3} drives. -aW IMPORTANT: This email remains

Re: [Veritas-bu] Problems with network speed (NBU 6.0MP4)

You said you've checked NIC but don't provide details. One thing that we've seen as a common problem is networking. On HP-UX the 100 MB cards MUST be hard set to 100 Full as must the associated switch ports. They do NOT autonegotiate properly. (For Gigabit ethernet both sides have to be

Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows default maximum block size ... 64KB still ?

Yes, it was reintroduced with SP1 for windows 2003 (32-bit) Regards Michael 2007/10/10, Wilkinson, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all is the default maximum block size for I/O transfers on windows still only 64KB ? If so, is this possible to change ? And is it bad practice on windows hosts to

[Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 MP5 Linux MP5 Server bug

All, I had a call with Symantec concerning a problem I had with /opt changing permissions from 0755 to 0700 during the NB_60_5_M_290383(2).linux(64) MP5 upgrades. It turns out that a known, but not yet published bug exists where the Linux Server patch will change the permissions of /opt to 0700.

Re: [Veritas-bu] NB 6.0 MP5 Linux MP5 Server bug

Good to note, thanks! On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Sponsler, Michael wrote: All, I had a call with Symantec concerning a problem I had with /opt changing permissions from 0755 to 0700 during the NB_60_5_M_290383(2).linux(64) MP5 upgrades. It turns out that a known, but not yet published bug exists

[Veritas-bu] 6.5 Features that aren't yet available?

I am debating on upgrading from 6.0 to 6.5 to gain some of the new disk features and the BMR that is now included but it seems like the more I read the more features that are not actually implemented yet, even though they were announced as being part of 6.5. Is there a definitive list of what

Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.5 Features that aren't yet available?

The 6.5 release notes on Symantec.com should have that info. --- W. Curtis Preston Backup Blog @ www.backupcentral.com VP Data Protection, GlassHouse Technologies -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bthessel Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007

[Veritas-bu] 5.1 Exchange 2003 Restore

I've had to fire up our legacy NBU 5.1 environment to do some exchange restores and they are all failing with the following / similar errors: 10/10/2007 1:33:28 PM - Warning bpbrm(pid=5180) from client pbcomx50: WRN - error writing object: Microsoft Information Store:\SG2\ILT1-MX02SG1

Re: [Veritas-bu] BMR boot server on Solaris

On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 07:57:56AM -0400, rcarlisle wrote: Hi all, I am new to BMR and trying to load up a boot server on a Solaris platform. The BMR documentation says that bootp, NFS, and tftp is required on all Unix Boot servers, but Solaris does not support bootp. I have tftp turned on,

Re: [Veritas-bu] Scripting Tape Expiration on Windows

On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 09:13:33AM -0400, Brooks, Jason wrote: All works well, but I want to capture any errors bpexpdate throws. Right now, here's what I'm doing: Return = WshShell.Run (CMD.EXE /C D:\Progra~1\Veritas\NetBackup\bin\admincmd\bpexpdate.exe -d 0 -force -m Tape )

Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.5 Features that aren't yet available?

That's like saying the information should be written on a needle in that large haystack. Symantec seems to treat NetBackup like the ugly step child. http://www.symantec.com/business/solutions/key_products.jsp?solid=smb_br See NetBackup even listed Backup Recovery Solutions? These might be a

Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.5 Features that aren't yet available?

My pre-release admonitions against planning around vaporware appear to have been on the mark. To whit: Don't hold off doing something you need now on the theory it will have more of what you want in the next release because it often isn't even if the vendor claims it will be. -Original

Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Exchange 2003 Restore

Are your BUFFERS setup the same? SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS/etc? Justin. On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Martin, Jonathan wrote: Overwrite Database tab is checked, database exists in a location that exists and has plenty of free space. -Jonathan -Original Message- From: K Chapman [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Exchange 2003 Restore

Overwrite Database tab is checked, database exists in a location that exists and has plenty of free space. -Jonathan -Original Message- From: K Chapman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 2:59 PM To: Martin, Jonathan; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject:

Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.5 Features that aren't yet available?

You have Small Medium Business tab highlighted (hence the smb in the url you gave). Symantec doesn't target NBU at the SMB space. Click on Enterprise - Backup Recovery - Key Products, and you'll see NetBackup. This is one of the unfortunate things of the merger. What used to be the cash cow

Re: [Veritas-bu] SSO slower than network issue

Are you using T2000 servers? This blog entry helped us improve performance, though I don't think we were even that slow in the beginning. http://blogs.sun.com/ValdisFilks/entry/improving_i_o_throughput_for -Rusty -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.5 Features that aren't yet available?

**laughs** Yes, so very easy to find. That's why I looked up the link for the poor person who asked originally. Me - I refuse to upgrade off of 6.0 MP4 until others bleed out first. I'll make the jump once the blood shed reduces to a trickle. If I had jumped on MP5 I'd be hurting right now in

Re: [Veritas-bu] 5.1 Exchange 2003 Restore

Does the user with the NBU service have proper permissions? Crank up logging and see what messages that produces. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 12:36 PM To:

Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows default maximum block size ... 64KB still ?

0n Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 10:04:03PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote: Hi all is the default maximum block size for I/O transfers on windows still only 64KB ? If so, is this possible to change ? And is it bad practice on windows hosts to change the block size ? Context: We