Assuming that you are not using VxSS, Did you restart bprd and bpdbm after
you added the SERVER= entry to the bp.conf? It is not enough to just
re-read the configuration.
Check for active backups using:
/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/bpps -a
To stop bpdbm:
/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/bpdbm
Hi,
We are trying to backup a file system containing hundreds of thousands of
folders and millions of files.
This data has recently been transferred from a windows 2003 box to a vfiler
running on a NetApp fas 3020. We are using NDMP from filer to LTO4 and getting
6300 KB/Sec.
I know its the
Hello You can try to restart your netbackup services and submit again your restore job SalamYosephFrom: "MPITSO, TSHEPO" tshepo.mpi...@gauteng.gov.zaTo: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSent: Monday, June 1, 2009 8:19:56 PMSubject: [Veritas-bu] please, please help
Hi everyone
Hi
I have rebooted the Master server and the robot yesterday and everything seems
working fine this morning!!
Thank you
Tshepo Mpitso
System Backup Administrator
Gauteng Shared Services Centre (GSSC)
Technology Support Services (TSS)
6 Floor 75 FOX Street Johannesburg
Guys i'm after a bit of backup as am perhaps doubting myself now.
I'm having a bit of a row with a CSA (solutions architect) at our company.
A backup design has been done where 2 sites have Solaris clients
configured with the same name and ip, and one site is just disconnected
from the
Hi All
SCAN-TLD keeps appearing and staying on the Master Server - This is also
present on some media Servers.
bounced the Services many times, but when I do, the SCAN-TLD seems to
move to another Media Server, or back to the Master !
Any ideas - NBU Upgrade 6.5.2 Win2k3 SP2
Regards
Simon
Disregard. I ended up starting device manager on EACH Media Server and
this seems to have got around!
__
From: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 12:15 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: SCAN-TLD
The first media server in an SSO environment that starts ltid becomes the
SCAN-HOST for all shared drives (status SCAN-TLD). If a drive is DOWN’ed on the
SCAN-HOST, another media server becomes the SCAN-HOST for that drive. If
services on SCAN-HOST is stopped/restarted, another media server
I thought in 6.x it didn't really matter which was the SCAN-HOST - that
is to say setting priority is no longer important?
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Marianne
Van Den Berg
I know the answer but need to look it up when I get to work
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: Tue Jun 02 06:15:19 2009
I was having an issue with my robot and the scan host.
Support had me set my master to priority 5 so that the master was always
the scan host.
If the master is down it is not going to work anyway.
Once I did that I stopped having issues.
From:
Hello Guru's ... We are struggling with this scenario. We are a
Netbackup 6.5.3.1 shop and recently discovered that using Frequency
Based Schedules that a Monthly Full backup and a Weekly Full backup for
the same client will run on the same weekend. What are we doing Wrong??
I know if we used
Thanks Marianne!
Yes, after stopping the Device Service on each box, I can see that! What
I could not understand is why the Drives did not come up correctly!!!
Seemed to take absolutely forever ! but as it turned out (from my other
post), I got there in the end !
Simon
Do not worry judy - I posted another email to say it was resolved.
I just could not find anything on scan-tld at the time and the drives
would not come back up!
Restarting the Device Service, seemed to do the trick . well doing
test backups now! And it looks ok
Simon
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 10:22:25AM -0400, Hudson, Steve wrote:
Hello Guru's ... We are struggling with this scenario. We are a
Netbackup 6.5.3.1 shop and recently discovered that using Frequency
Based Schedules that a Monthly Full backup and a Weekly Full backup for
the same client will run on
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Hudson, Steve steve.hud...@ironmountain.com
wrote:
Hello Guru’s … We are struggling with this scenario. We are a Netbackup
6.5.3.1 shop and recently discovered that using Frequency Based Schedules
that a Monthly Full backup and a Weekly Full backup for the
I thought 5 was the default?
I increase the scanability of my master servers to 8 to try to increase
the likelihood of the master becoming the scan host. I've seen
performance (not just backup, but performance in general) on media
servers that have become the scan host for a large number of
Hi Steve,
If the backup windows for the Weekly and Monthly schedules are different,
then NetBackup will run both. If they are the same, NetBackup will skip the
Weekly when the Monthly is scheduled for the same day.
-- Kathy
--
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009
Most servers get really ticked off if you try to overwrite the running OS files
- assuming they'll let you do it at all. Probably because an overwrite is
effectively a delete and then create. So great, what happens when you restore
that critical library file that Solaris was using to run ? Or
please help.
TQ
From: nizar1...@hotmail.com
To: veritas-bu-ow...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: I need help please
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 06:53:19 +
Dear All
I faced critical error with my veritas netbackup 5.0 which I used for last two
year to backup my company
We tested this and you are right that you will likely run into problems doing
an entire system restore via netbackup. Even with the best will in the world,
there is bound to be some kind of configuration file which will mess things up
on the running system during the restore. Will the servers
Hi,
I have the same now, but with EMC Celerra, I tested with multistreaming and
multiple backup policies for different mount points, I also created multiple
mount points on the filer instead a giant one. I can see it streams better,
now I want to team the nics on the media backup server and see
I found the best way is to build the OS to match the original, then recover
all data including system files via NetBackup. I do have BMR configured, but
the sequential order for restore will take much longer then OS, and then
full systems restore on top. I don't do BMR for Solaris and Linux
Can you supply the error of why it is not compleating?
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of nizar
motasim
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 3:23 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
I have configured and tested BMR in my test environment, and am getting
ready to go to 6.5.3.1 next week in production. We replicate our NBU
server's rootvg (AIX) to SAN storage at our DR location, where similar
hardware sits ready to boot when the line is cut. Naturally, this will
keep the
please help.
please give me fast solution to cover this problem ,
note: as I remember I need to change some thing on the configuration
reducing or dicreasing some thing .
Try reading the admin guides to learn how Netbackup scheduling works
___
Before posting to this forum, you need to understand that it is also connected
to a mailing list that existed before the forum, and that we must respect that
community's wishes. EVERY forum post that you make is immediately sent to that
mailing list as an email. Messages that include no
Hello Guru's ... We are struggling with this scenario. We
are a Netbackup 6.5.3.1 shop and recently discovered that
using Frequency Based Schedules that a Monthly Full backup
and a Weekly Full backup for the same client will run on
the same weekend. What are we doing Wrong??
You
28 matches
Mail list logo
