Re: [Veritas-bu] Vmware VCB VDR

2010-09-09 Thread Praveen Gupta
You need an enterprise client license for NBU. Process with VDR is
pretty smooth and quick in comparison to VCB.

Thanks,
Praveen Gupta

-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of tkutil
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 7:42 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Vmware VCB  VDR

I'm looking for experiences using VCB or VDR backups with NetBackup.
Currently, we are only doing file level backups at the OS level, but I'm
looking into the possibility of leveraging NetBackup to backup the whole
VM for DR purposes. 
Have you been successful in implementing either VCB or VDR backups?
Are there any clients that need to be purchases?

I have used VCB in the past with Networker and understand how that works
as far as configuration, but have no experience with VDR. To me it looks
like VDR is a disk-to-disk type backup, but I'm wondering if NetBackup
has the ability to write to tape?

Thanks

+--
|This was sent by troy.ku...@milwaukeetool.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Understanding DSSU

2010-09-09 Thread Nate Sanders
 Yeah it sounds like disk pools may be the answer. The thing that has me
confused is that for 9 straight days before our 5.1MP6--6.5.6 upgrade,
I had 0 failed jobs. I found two problems in two different policies that
were the cause of all previous DSSU troubles and as able to fix them. So
suddenly after no change but the NBU software version, we're seeing a
%35 increase in the number of failed jobs on DSSU.


On 09/07/2010 04:39 AM, Nic Solomons wrote:
 What you are describing is the same behaviour I see across my environments.
 Not aware of any functional modification that 'fixes' this, either...

 Once NB assigns a resource to a job, it will wait on that resources 
 availability. It does this for DSSUs, Tape heads, everything.

 i.e. as you are seeing, if a job is running against one DSSU, and that DSSU 
 goes full during the job, it will wait on cleanup processes, until timing 
 out. No spillover.
 Same with tape heads, if you have a job running against a tape head, and that 
 tape goes full, and the only other available media is running jobs in another 
 head, that job will never switch heads.

 I think someone mentioned disk pools, which would do what you want 
 (configured through volume manager, or using nbdevconfig at CLI) - but i'm 
 assuming you are using Basic Disk units currently, and Disk Pools are 
 Advanced Disk (which has an additional license cost associated).  Of course, 
 if you switch to advanced disk, it means you can use SLPs instead of DSSUs as 
 well...

 Additional/advanced functionality - theres always a cost :P

 Cheers,
 Nic


 -Original Message-
 From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
 [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Nate Sanders
 Sent: 03 September 2010 19:32
 To: rusty.ma...@sungard.com
 Cc: Sanders, Nate; Veritas List; veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Understanding DSSU

 After checking all 6 DSSUs only one contained 6 images that were
 expired. This for sure does not explain why we continue seeing failed
 jobs, especially tiny failed jobs.

 So is my understanding of Storage Groups not correct? When one unit says
 its full, shouldn't the job proceed to the next unit in the group? This
 is certainly not the behavior we are seeing based on logs and errors.


 On 09/02/2010 02:43 PM, rusty.ma...@sungard.com wrote:
   
 I first did an ls -l and grabbed the image ID of the images I thought were 
 too old and should have been destaged and expired off of the DSSU.
 I then took those images and ran them through bpimagelist to see if they had 
 a copy on tape (or if it should have been expired).
 Those that had a copy on tape or should have been expired were bpexpdate'd.

 If you aren't familiar with these commands, read up on them in the commands 
 guide and do some practicing with them. Especially with bpexpdate.

 Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability 
 Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 ▪ 281-584-4693
 Keeping People and Information Connected® ▪ http://availability.sungard.com/
 P Think before you print
 CONFIDENTIALITY:  This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain 
 confidential, proprietary and privileged information, and unauthorized 
 disclosure or use is prohibited.  If you received this e-mail in error, 
 please notify the sender and delete this e-mail from your system.
 


 The information contained in this e-mail and its attachments is confidential.
 It is intended only for the named address(es) and may not be disclosed to 
 anyone else without Attenda's consent.
   

-- 
Nate SandersDigital Motorworks
System Administrator  (512) 692 - 1038




This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee 
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader 
of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachments from your system.
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Understanding DSSU

2010-09-09 Thread Larry Fahnoe
Here's a quick little script that will validate images on DSSU and let you
know if there are images that are not in the catalog.  I'd make sure the
contents of your DSSUs make sense before I looked further.  You might also
want to destage more frequently.

--Larry

#!/bin/sh

usage() {
echo usage: `basename $0` storage_unit_path
}

if [ $# -ne 1 ]
then
usage
exit 1
fi

cd $1
for BACKUP_ID in `ls -1 *.info *.img | sed -e 's/_C.*$//' | sort | uniq`; do
copies=`bpimagelist -backupid $BACKUP_ID  2/dev/null | awk '/^IMAGE/
{print $21}'`
if [ -z $copies ]
then
echo $BACKUP_ID not found in catalog
else
if [ $copies -eq 1 ]
then
echo $BACKUP_ID waiting (copies=$copies)
else
echo $BACKUP_ID destaged (copies=$copies)
fi
fi
done


On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Nate Sanders sande...@dmotorworks.comwrote:

  Yeah it sounds like disk pools may be the answer. The thing that has me
 confused is that for 9 straight days before our 5.1MP6--6.5.6 upgrade,
 I had 0 failed jobs. I found two problems in two different policies that
 were the cause of all previous DSSU troubles and as able to fix them. So
 suddenly after no change but the NBU software version, we're seeing a
 %35 increase in the number of failed jobs on DSSU.


 On 09/07/2010 04:39 AM, Nic Solomons wrote:
  What you are describing is the same behaviour I see across my
 environments.
  Not aware of any functional modification that 'fixes' this, either...
 
  Once NB assigns a resource to a job, it will wait on that resources
 availability. It does this for DSSUs, Tape heads, everything.
 
  i.e. as you are seeing, if a job is running against one DSSU, and that
 DSSU goes full during the job, it will wait on cleanup processes, until
 timing out. No spillover.
  Same with tape heads, if you have a job running against a tape head, and
 that tape goes full, and the only other available media is running jobs in
 another head, that job will never switch heads.
 
  I think someone mentioned disk pools, which would do what you want
 (configured through volume manager, or using nbdevconfig at CLI) - but i'm
 assuming you are using Basic Disk units currently, and Disk Pools are
 Advanced Disk (which has an additional license cost associated).  Of course,
 if you switch to advanced disk, it means you can use SLPs instead of DSSUs
 as well...
 
  Additional/advanced functionality - theres always a cost :P
 
  Cheers,
  Nic
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:
 veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Nate Sanders
  Sent: 03 September 2010 19:32
  To: rusty.ma...@sungard.com
  Cc: Sanders, Nate; Veritas List;
 veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
  Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Understanding DSSU
 
  After checking all 6 DSSUs only one contained 6 images that were
  expired. This for sure does not explain why we continue seeing failed
  jobs, especially tiny failed jobs.
 
  So is my understanding of Storage Groups not correct? When one unit says
  its full, shouldn't the job proceed to the next unit in the group? This
  is certainly not the behavior we are seeing based on logs and errors.
 
 
  On 09/02/2010 02:43 PM, rusty.ma...@sungard.com wrote:
 
  I first did an ls -l and grabbed the image ID of the images I thought
 were too old and should have been destaged and expired off of the DSSU.
  I then took those images and ran them through bpimagelist to see if they
 had a copy on tape (or if it should have been expired).
  Those that had a copy on tape or should have been expired were
 bpexpdate'd.
 
  If you aren't familiar with these commands, read up on them in the
 commands guide and do some practicing with them. Especially with bpexpdate.
 
  Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard
 Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 ▪
 281-584-4693
  Keeping People and Information Connected® ▪
 http://availability.sungard.com/
  P Think before you print
  CONFIDENTIALITY:  This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain
 confidential, proprietary and privileged information, and unauthorized
 disclosure or use is prohibited.  If you received this e-mail in error,
 please notify the sender and delete this e-mail from your system.
 
 
 
  The information contained in this e-mail and its attachments is
 confidential.
  It is intended only for the named address(es) and may not be disclosed to
 anyone else without Attenda's consent.
 

 --
 Nate SandersDigital Motorworks
 System Administrator  (512) 692 - 1038




 This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
 addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential.
 If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized
 representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
 dissemination of this communication is 

Re: [Veritas-bu] Understanding DSSU

2010-09-09 Thread Nate Sanders
We're down to destaging every 2 hours. This is as low as it has ever
been. When we were on NBU 5.1MP6 we were destaging between 4-6 hours
with 0 failed jobs. It doesn't seem to add up to me, I've also run
checks against dead images on the DSSU's. Out of 6 DSSU's and thousands
of images, only 6 showed up as being abandoned.


On 09/09/2010 09:30 AM, Larry Fahnoe wrote:
 Here's a quick little script that will validate images on DSSU and let you 
 know if there are images that are not in the catalog.  I'd make sure the 
 contents of your DSSUs make sense before I looked further.  You might also 
 want to destage more frequently.

 --Larry

 #!/bin/sh

 usage() {
 echo usage: `basename $0` storage_unit_path
 }

 if [ $# -ne 1 ]
 then
 usage
 exit 1
 fi

 cd $1
 for BACKUP_ID in `ls -1 *.info *.img | sed -e 's/_C.*$//' | sort | uniq`; do
 copies=`bpimagelist -backupid $BACKUP_ID  2/dev/null | awk '/^IMAGE/ 
 {print $21}'`
 if [ -z $copies ]
 then
 echo $BACKUP_ID not found in catalog
 else
 if [ $copies -eq 1 ]
 then
 echo $BACKUP_ID waiting (copies=$copies)
 else
 echo $BACKUP_ID destaged (copies=$copies)
 fi
 fi
 done


 On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Nate Sanders 
 sande...@dmotorworks.commailto:sande...@dmotorworks.com wrote:
  Yeah it sounds like disk pools may be the answer. The thing that has me
 confused is that for 9 straight days before our 5.1MP6--6.5.6 upgrade,
 I had 0 failed jobs. I found two problems in two different policies that
 were the cause of all previous DSSU troubles and as able to fix them. So
 suddenly after no change but the NBU software version, we're seeing a
 %35 increase in the number of failed jobs on DSSU.


 On 09/07/2010 04:39 AM, Nic Solomons wrote:
   
 What you are describing is the same behaviour I see across my environments.
 Not aware of any functional modification that 'fixes' this, either...

 Once NB assigns a resource to a job, it will wait on that resources 
 availability. It does this for DSSUs, Tape heads, everything.

 i.e. as you are seeing, if a job is running against one DSSU, and that DSSU 
 goes full during the job, it will wait on cleanup processes, until timing 
 out. No spillover.
 Same with tape heads, if you have a job running against a tape head, and 
 that tape goes full, and the only other available media is running jobs in 
 another head, that job will never switch heads.

 I think someone mentioned disk pools, which would do what you want 
 (configured through volume manager, or using nbdevconfig at CLI) - but i'm 
 assuming you are using Basic Disk units currently, and Disk Pools are 
 Advanced Disk (which has an additional license cost associated).  Of course, 
 if you switch to advanced disk, it means you can use SLPs instead of DSSUs 
 as well...

 Additional/advanced functionality - theres always a cost :P

 Cheers,
 Nic


 -Original Message-
 From: 
 veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edumailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
  
 [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edumailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu]
  On Behalf Of Nate Sanders
 Sent: 03 September 2010 19:32
 To: rusty.ma...@sungard.commailto:rusty.ma...@sungard.com
 Cc: Sanders, Nate; Veritas List; 
 veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edumailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
 Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Understanding DSSU

 After checking all 6 DSSUs only one contained 6 images that were
 expired. This for sure does not explain why we continue seeing failed
 jobs, especially tiny failed jobs.

 So is my understanding of Storage Groups not correct? When one unit says
 its full, shouldn't the job proceed to the next unit in the group? This
 is certainly not the behavior we are seeing based on logs and errors.


 On 09/02/2010 02:43 PM, 
 rusty.ma...@sungard.commailto:rusty.ma...@sungard.com wrote:

 
 I first did an ls -l and grabbed the image ID of the images I thought were 
 too old and should have been destaged and expired off of the DSSU.
 I then took those images and ran them through bpimagelist to see if they 
 had a copy on tape (or if it should have been expired).
 Those that had a copy on tape or should have been expired were bpexpdate'd.

 If you aren't familiar with these commands, read up on them in the commands 
 guide and do some practicing with them. Especially with bpexpdate.

 Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability 
 Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 ▪ 281-584-4693
 Keeping People and Information Connected® ▪ http://availability.sungard.com/
 P Think before you print
 CONFIDENTIALITY:  This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain 
 confidential, proprietary and privileged information, and unauthorized 
 disclosure or use is prohibited.  If you received this e-mail in error, 
 please notify the sender and delete this e-mail from your system.

   

 The 

[Veritas-bu] Email Notifications - Changed after 6.5.6

2010-09-09 Thread WEAVER, Simon (external)
Hi All,
Got a little puzzle, that I cannot seem to track where the problem is,
but here goes...

Win2k3 SP2 Ent + NBU 6.5.6 Master, Media and all clients.

It all went on well (Originally 6.5.3) apart from BMR Boot Server still
showing 6.5.3, although I will look into that later by reapplying the
update pack.
But main problem is notification of emails seemed to have changed. I
used to get all emails, regardless of status detailing this

Tue 09/07/2010  07:10 - 
Tue 09/07/2010  07:10CLIENT:  SQL 
Tue 09/07/2010  07:10POLICY:  SQL_SERVER 
Tue 09/07/2010  07:10  SCHEDULE:  SERVER_FULL 
Tue 09/07/2010  07:10 SCHEDULE TYPE:  FULL 
Tue 09/07/2010  07:10STATUS:  0 
Tue 09/07/2010  07:10STREAM:  0 
Tue 09/07/2010  07:10 - 

But since the update, I am now only getting emails with status 1 or
higher and they look like this in the email

Backup on client FILE001 for user root by server MyBackup was partially
successful.

Policy = TEST_BACKUP
Schedule = Test_Incr_Backup

File list
-
C:\Colours.reg

For the life of me, I have checked my backup_exit_notify.cmd and
nbmail.cmd and I even have the original versions prior to the update,
and yet these have not changed.
Any ideas?

Regards

Si


This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential
and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected
from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any
attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its
content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments
from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this
email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified.
-o-
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office:
Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Email Notifications - Changed after 6.5.6

2010-09-09 Thread judy_hinchcliffe
When you upgrade the files can get over written.

So you file that you had modified to tell you what levels to email on may have 
been overwritten.


From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon 
(external)
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 9:26 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Email Notifications - Changed after 6.5.6


Hi All,
Got a little puzzle, that I cannot seem to track where the problem is, but here 
goes...

Win2k3 SP2 Ent + NBU 6.5.6 Master, Media and all clients.

It all went on well (Originally 6.5.3) apart from BMR Boot Server still showing 
6.5.3, although I will look into that later by reapplying the update pack.

But main problem is notification of emails seemed to have changed. I used to 
get all emails, regardless of status detailing this

Tue 09/07/2010  07:10 -
Tue 09/07/2010  07:10CLIENT:  SQL
Tue 09/07/2010  07:10POLICY:  SQL_SERVER
Tue 09/07/2010  07:10  SCHEDULE:  SERVER_FULL
Tue 09/07/2010  07:10 SCHEDULE TYPE:  FULL
Tue 09/07/2010  07:10STATUS:  0
Tue 09/07/2010  07:10STREAM:  0
Tue 09/07/2010  07:10 -

But since the update, I am now only getting emails with status 1 or higher and 
they look like this in the email

Backup on client FILE001 for user root by server MyBackup was partially 
successful.

Policy = TEST_BACKUP
Schedule = Test_Incr_Backup

File list
-
C:\Colours.reg

For the life of me, I have checked my backup_exit_notify.cmd and nbmail.cmd and 
I even have the original versions prior to the update, and yet these have not 
changed.

Any ideas?

Regards

Si

This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential

and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected

from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please

notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any

attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its

content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments

from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this

email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified.

-o-

Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259

Registered Office:

Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Vmware VCB VDR

2010-09-09 Thread Kevin Corley
Anybody using a good way to dump the VDR images to tape (netbackup) for long 
term retention?

-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Praveen Gupta
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:10 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Vmware VCB  VDR

You need an enterprise client license for NBU. Process with VDR is pretty 
smooth and quick in comparison to VCB.

Thanks,
Praveen Gupta

-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of tkutil
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 7:42 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Vmware VCB  VDR

I'm looking for experiences using VCB or VDR backups with NetBackup.
Currently, we are only doing file level backups at the OS level, but I'm 
looking into the possibility of leveraging NetBackup to backup the whole VM for 
DR purposes.
Have you been successful in implementing either VCB or VDR backups?
Are there any clients that need to be purchases?

I have used VCB in the past with Networker and understand how that works as far 
as configuration, but have no experience with VDR. To me it looks like VDR is a 
disk-to-disk type backup, but I'm wondering if NetBackup has the ability to 
write to tape?

Thanks

+--
|This was sent by troy.ku...@milwaukeetool.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


This message is private and confidential. If you have received it in error, 
please notify the sender and remove it from your system.


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] restore windows files to a MAC

2010-09-09 Thread judy_hinchcliffe
Anybody have any hints on how to restore files from a windows server to a MAC 
server?

Judy Hinchcliffe
AIX Systems Engineer, Technology - Infrastructure  Services

19001 Crecent Springs Drive
Mail Stop 2-5335
Kingwood, Texas 77339
OFFICE: 281-312-3538

[administaff]http://www.administaff.com/?pid=emailsig

inline: image001.jpg___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] restore windows files to a MAC

2010-09-09 Thread scott . george
I did this old school.  I turned on the FTP server on the Mac, and used 
Filezilla to mass copy everything over that I wanted.

It wasn't elegant, but it worked.

Scott E. George
Technical Specialist - Lead
UNIX Systems Administrator




From:
judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com
To:
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Date:
09/09/2010 02:10 PM
Subject:
[Veritas-bu] restore windows files to a MAC
Sent by:
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu



Anybody have any hints on how to restore files from a windows server to a 
MAC server?
 
Judy Hinchcliffe
AIX Systems Engineer, Technology - Infrastructure  Services
 
19001 Crecent Springs Drive
Mail Stop 2-5335
Kingwood, Texas 77339
OFFICE: 281-312-3538
 

 ___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu



PLEASE NOTE: The preceding information may be confidential or
privileged. It only should be used or disseminated for the purpose
of conducting business with Parker. If you are not an intended
recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and
then delete the information from your system. Thank you for your
cooperation.
image/jpeg___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] restore windows files to a MAC

2010-09-09 Thread scott . george
I forgot about the maillist. 

If you are doing this with NBU,  I would think backing up the Windows 
client as a standard client and then restoring from that backup would 
work.  I had a slew of Windows servers get changed to standard clients and 
they backed up just fine, but wouldn't show up as MS clients when it came 
time to restore.  Make a separate policy for the standard client of the 
Win server.


Scott E. George
Technical Specialist - Lead
UNIX Systems Administrator
Phone:  (216)896-2197
E-mail:  scott.geo...@parker.com



From:
judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com
To:
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Date:
09/09/2010 02:10 PM
Subject:
[Veritas-bu] restore windows files to a MAC
Sent by:
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu



Anybody have any hints on how to restore files from a windows server to a 
MAC server?
 
Judy Hinchcliffe
AIX Systems Engineer, Technology - Infrastructure  Services
 
19001 Crecent Springs Drive
Mail Stop 2-5335
Kingwood, Texas 77339
OFFICE: 281-312-3538
 

 ___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu



PLEASE NOTE: The preceding information may be confidential or
privileged. It only should be used or disseminated for the purpose
of conducting business with Parker. If you are not an intended
recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and
then delete the information from your system. Thank you for your
cooperation.
image/jpeg___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] restore windows files to a MAC

2010-09-09 Thread judy_hinchcliffe
Problem is errors I get when trying to restore from the windows backup directly 
to the MAC.


17:17:48 (1624234.001) File /dir/dir_Content/ DEVELOPMENT/.DS_Store exists. 
Keeping it.
17:17:48 (1624234.001) Windows security info file type 'L' for .SeCuRiTy.4, 
ignored...

I got both L and U file type errors  (Unknown file type 'U' for)

17:19:47 (1624234.001) Changed /O/dir/ dir/dir/dir/dir return to work/to 
print/Fonts/file.otf to /dir/dir/ dir/dir/dir/dir/to print/Fonts/file.otf
17:19:47 (1624234.001) Could not create file /dir/dir/ dir/dir/dir/dir return 
to work/to print/Fonts/dir.otf: Not a directory
17:19:47 (1624234.001) Windows security info file type 'L' for .SeCuRiTy.589, 
ignored...


It only restored about half the files.


From: scott.geo...@parker.com [mailto:scott.geo...@parker.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:19 PM
To: Judy Hinchcliffe
Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] restore windows files to a MAC

I forgot about the maillist.

If you are doing this with NBU,  I would think backing up the Windows client as 
a standard client and then restoring from that backup would work.  I had a slew 
of Windows servers get changed to standard clients and they backed up just 
fine, but wouldn't show up as MS clients when it came time to restore.  Make a 
separate policy for the standard client of the Win server.


Scott E. George
Technical Specialist - Lead
UNIX Systems Administrator
Phone:  (216)896-2197
E-mail:  scott.geo...@parker.com

From:

judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com

To:

VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

Date:

09/09/2010 02:10 PM

Subject:

[Veritas-bu] restore windows files to a MAC

Sent by:

veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu






Anybody have any hints on how to restore files from a windows server to a MAC 
server?

Judy Hinchcliffe
AIX Systems Engineer, Technology - Infrastructure  Services

19001 Crecent Springs Drive
Mail Stop 2-5335
Kingwood, Texas 77339
OFFICE: 281-312-3538

[administaff]http://www.administaff.com/?pid=emailsig
 ___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

PLEASE NOTE: The preceding information may be confidential or privileged. It 
only should be used or disseminated for the purpose of conducting business with 
Parker. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender by 
replying to this message and then delete the information from your system. 
Thank you for your cooperation.
inline: image001.jpg___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] old policies

2010-09-09 Thread David McMullin
My standard is to make a policy that never runs named ARCHIVED and put the 
clients there.
If clients are not in a policy they do not show up in various lists, NB should 
scan the images directory for them but does not...

It is also easier when installing to put them in a policy that does not run on 
a schedule so adding and testing is simplified.

--

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 07:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Carlos Alberto Lima dos Santos carlos_lis...@yahoo.com.br
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Res:  Deleting policies
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Message-ID: 669254.40566...@web52403.mail.re2.yahoo.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Delete policies do not affect the images backups, but?you need remember the 
client name when?you need a restore to find the images.

T+

?
Carlos Alberto L. dos Santos (TOCA)
Eng. de Computa??o - Jundia? - SP Brasil
http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlostoca
http://netbackupblog.blogspot.com/
carlos_lis...@yahoo.com.br
 



- Mensagem original 
De: Nate Sanders sande...@dmotorworks.com
Para: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Enviadas: Ter?a-feira, 31 de Agosto de 2010 15:33:54
Assunto: [Veritas-bu] Deleting policies

In NBU 6.5.6, is there any danger in deleting policies via the GUI? Does
this effect the ability to restore, reference, scan, search, or dig up
information about old images on tape that used these now removed policies?

-- 
Nate Sanders? ? ? ? ? ? Digital Motorworks
System Administrator? ? ? (512) 692 - 1038




This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee 
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader 
of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in 
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachments from your system.
___
Veritas-bu maillist? -? Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] old policies

2010-09-09 Thread Ed Wilts
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:14 PM, David McMullin 
david.mcmul...@cbc-companies.com wrote:

 My standard is to make a policy that never runs named ARCHIVED and put
 the clients there.
 If clients are not in a policy they do not show up in various lists, NB
 should scan the images directory for them but does not...


One client per policy solves a lot of problems.  You can then just
deactivate the policy...

Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE
ewi...@ewilts.org
Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/in/ewilts
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


Re: [Veritas-bu] Email Notifications - Changed after 6.5.6

2010-09-09 Thread William Brown
The upper one looks like those from the ‘notify’ scripts on 
/usr/openv/netbackup/bin.  They get overwritten which is a pain.  I also 
discovered that at 6.5.6 some get extra parameters related to multi-stream 
jobs.  Amusingly one gets I think 7 parameters now, checks it has at least 6, 
and the comment says 5…  If you used to get them then you had uncommented the 
lines at the end that have the mail commands.  The logs that are mailed are 
otherwise overritten by the next job.

They are not I think always overwritten, so you may not have seen it before.  
Somewhere in the documents I do recall it warns of this and you should save 
them.  Luckily it does of course save them itself in the tar file it keeps to 
support backing out the patch.  I recovered our custom ones from there, and at 
that point found that the underlying template had changed.  As we run both 
6.5.6 and 6.5.4 that is a bore as I now need 2 variants or more customisation, 
as they get called with different numbers of parameters.

The lower one I also get but that is from the ‘client sends email’ or ‘server 
sends email’ settings in the server properties.

William D L Brown

From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu 
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon 
(external)
Sent: 09 September 2010 15:26
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Email Notifications - Changed after 6.5.6


Hi All,
Got a little puzzle, that I cannot seem to track where the problem is, but here 
goes...

Win2k3 SP2 Ent + NBU 6.5.6 Master, Media and all clients.

It all went on well (Originally 6.5.3) apart from BMR Boot Server still showing 
6.5.3, although I will look into that later by reapplying the update pack.

But main problem is notification of emails seemed to have changed. I used to 
get all emails, regardless of status detailing this

Tue 09/07/2010  07:10 -
Tue 09/07/2010  07:10CLIENT:  SQL
Tue 09/07/2010  07:10POLICY:  SQL_SERVER
Tue 09/07/2010  07:10  SCHEDULE:  SERVER_FULL
Tue 09/07/2010  07:10 SCHEDULE TYPE:  FULL
Tue 09/07/2010  07:10STATUS:  0
Tue 09/07/2010  07:10STREAM:  0
Tue 09/07/2010  07:10 -

But since the update, I am now only getting emails with status 1 or higher and 
they look like this in the email

Backup on client FILE001 for user root by server MyBackup was partially 
successful.

Policy = TEST_BACKUP
Schedule = Test_Incr_Backup

File list
-
C:\Colours.reg

For the life of me, I have checked my backup_exit_notify.cmd and nbmail.cmd and 
I even have the original versions prior to the update, and yet these have not 
changed.

Any ideas?

Regards

Si

This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential

and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected

from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please

notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any

attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its

content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments

from your system. Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this

email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified.

-o-

Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259

Registered Office:

Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England



---
This e-mail was sent by GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited 
(registered in England and Wales No. 1047315), which is a 
member of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. The 
registered address of GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited 
is 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex TW8 9GS.
---
___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu


[Veritas-bu] Windows 2008 R2 NBU 7.0 Master, attempting CIFS Basic Disk S

2010-09-09 Thread spaldam

mozje wrote:
 Just as a followup should people care. This is working perfectly in nbu, you 
 only need to setup the cifs share correctly :) which was not the case at my 
 first attempts.


How do you set it up correctly? (as apposed to incorrectly)

Thanks.

+--
|This was sent by spal...@spaldam.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--


___
Veritas-bu maillist  -  Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu