Re: [Veritas-bu] What are your thoughts on filesystem monitoring?

2008-11-06 Thread Donaldson, Mark
The majority of our NFS mounts are not backed up on the server that's mounting them. We have cross mountpoints checked but follow nfs unchecked. We mount all NFS servers to a central machine and back it up there. We consider this more managable than trying to decide on what server a

Re: [Veritas-bu] multistream a user-defined backup.

2008-11-07 Thread Donaldson, Mark
You're right - user-defined backups won't break into multiple streams. You can do multiple bpbackup commands. If you do them in rapid succession, NetBackup will usually multiplex them correctly onto a tape. Something like: for dir in Microsoft Information Store:\*SG* do bpbackup -p policy_name

Re: [Veritas-bu] multistream a user-defined backup.

2008-11-07 Thread Donaldson, Mark
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 11:04 AM To: Donaldson, Mark; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] multistream a user-defined backup. Yes, but the problem with the full backup is it truncates the logs, and we do not want that to happen. SO form what you're

Re: [Veritas-bu] bpend_notify

2008-11-07 Thread Donaldson, Mark
parent_start_notify parent_end_notify. Documentation says they run on the client but it lies. It only runs on the master server. and backup_exit_notify still works on the master server. Before 6.x, there was no equivalent to the parent starts end scripts. It was a constant search to find a

Re: [Veritas-bu] bpduplicate specific fragments?

2008-11-20 Thread Donaldson, Mark
I don't know of anyway to do this. You might be hosed on this one. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of A Darren Dunham Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 2:42 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] bpduplicate specific

Re: [Veritas-bu] Full backup followed by a Differential= Another Full

2008-12-10 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Netbackup, by default, uses mtime for incrementals. It can be configured to use C-time in bp.conf but that's not usual at all. More here: http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/200644.htm -M -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Doering

Re: [Veritas-bu] eliminating volume pools

2008-12-18 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Are you confusing volume pools storage units? I can see hardware encryption tied to a tape drive set much more than a volume pool. That said, if you really want to get rid of volume pools, be careful with data that doesn't live together well. Oracle data oracle archived redo should live on

[Veritas-bu] Just how smart is Netbackup on restores? (Full/Cumu/Incr)

2008-12-23 Thread Donaldson, Mark
I've got a set of policies that follow a pattern of: Monthly - Full Weekly - Cumulative Incremental Daily - Differential Incremental If it's been 20 days from the last full, then what I need is the full backup from 20 days ago, then a big skip to the previous cumulative the incrementals from

[Veritas-bu] Linux slowly dropping drives.

2009-01-28 Thread Donaldson, Mark
We have a dedicated media server built on an AMD box running RHEL 5.2 (2.6.18-92.1.13.el5 #1 SMP Thu Sep 4 03:51:21 EDT 2008 x86_64). Over time, our LTO2 drives will go down one by one. A scan doesn't seem to show any issues but if I vmoprcmd -up them, they'll just go down again. After I

Re: [Veritas-bu] Linux slowly dropping drives.

2009-01-28 Thread Donaldson, Mark
the only Linux media server in my environment. (We're using the native lto2 drive, too - supposed to be part of this OS). -M -Original Message- From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 11:33 AM To: Donaldson, Mark Cc: veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Linux slowly dropping drives.

2009-01-29 Thread Donaldson, Mark
...@radian.biz] Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 12:30 PM To: Donaldson, Mark Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Linux slowly dropping drives. One drive may easily have needed cleaning for longer... or are you saying the two that advertise that are a disjoint set from

Re: [Veritas-bu] Linux slowly dropping drives.

2009-01-29 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Not yet - I'm mixed version for NB across the enterprise - I thought I'd stablize on one version before I involve RH. From: Andrew White [mailto:adwh...@inchix.net] Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 1:39 PM To: Rosenkoetter, Gabriel Cc: Donaldson, Mark; veritas

Re: [Veritas-bu] Linux slowly dropping drives.

2009-01-29 Thread Donaldson, Mark
for the bridges? It might be worth upgrading the firmware if so... -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Donaldson, Mark Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 2:48 PM To: Rosenkoetter, Gabriel Cc: veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Real time failure notification

2009-02-04 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Your don't alert if retry was successful automatically excludes the idea of a real-time monitor. It's a bit like saying Don't alert if you're going to succeed in the future. We solved this by creating an after-the-fact monitor for our backups - it searches the bpdbjobs output daily and parses

Re: [Veritas-bu] Real time failure notification

2009-02-06 Thread Donaldson, Mark
in the volume of one-off failures, most of which we wouldn't restart anyway and would just leave for the next night's cycle. -Original Message- From: Travis Kelley [mailto:rhat...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 7:47 AM To: Jeff Lightner; Donaldson, Mark; veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Multiple Master for Single Client

2009-02-09 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Note: Anything initiated on the client side, though, ie: user-backups user-archives, is going to use the first server in the bp.conf file. -M -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of W. Curtis

Re: [Veritas-bu] how to specifying what to backup

2009-02-12 Thread Donaldson, Mark
If server B has no G drive and servera has no C, then you can put the superset in one policy C, E, F, G It doesn't error as long as one thing in the backup include list exists. Adding things to an exclude list works but does slow your backup - the backup process builds a list of all things on

Re: [Veritas-bu] [Q] How to check Veritas client 6.5 daemonrunningonLinux????

2009-02-15 Thread Donaldson, Mark
:39 AM To: Donaldson, Mark; jlight...@water.com; aaa aaa Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] [Q] How to check Veritas client 6.5 daemonrunningonLinux I checked my DELL server which have Netbackup client 6.5 install in it (Redhat 4.7). I have everything you guy mention in here, but I still got: Backup

Re: [Veritas-bu] [Q] How to check Veritas client 6.5 daemonrunningonLinux????

2009-02-16 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Can you post the policy for this client? From: bbb bb [mailto:mcc...@hotmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 5:33 PM To: Donaldson, Mark; jlight...@water.com; aaa aaa Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] [Q] How to check Veritas client 6.5 daemonrunningonLinux I

Re: [Veritas-bu] Legal Freeze / Frozen Media

2009-02-17 Thread Donaldson, Mark
ah - good. I was going to say that freezing media, in the bpmedia -freeze sense will still allow your images to expire. When I get a legal freeze, I duplicate those images to another pool of tapes with a long, long retention. (I go 8 years - infinity is a loong time) (unless directed

Re: [Veritas-bu] Change in NET_BUFFER_SZ

2009-02-17 Thread Donaldson, Mark
There's nothing to restart on a client... (This is a client option) -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Justin Piszcz Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 11:33 AM To: Geyer, Gregory Cc:

[Veritas-bu] Native Linux support of LTO drives

2009-02-17 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Are you guys using the native support for Ultrium drives when you have a Linux media server (I'm all LTO2 but I'm also wondering about the later versions). It's come up at a sister site and we're not sure what to advise. My one Linux media server is using the 2.6 built-in drivers but it's also

Re: [Veritas-bu] How to backup to multiple drives

2009-02-19 Thread Donaldson, Mark
You got multiplexing backwards. Multiplexing is multiple backups going to a single drive. Your drive transfer rate means you want a single backup going to multiple drives. Unfortunately, this isn't possible. You'll need to break up your backup into multiple images and send it to multiple

Re: [Veritas-bu] backup retrieve test

2009-02-20 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Here's how we did it... We identified a critical subset of our servers for audit purposes - we don't test all servers for backup/restore audits. I have a special backup policy that backs up a dummy file on each critical audit server. I have a script on each audit server that restore this test

Re: [Veritas-bu] Scripting bpdbjobs

2009-02-20 Thread Donaldson, Mark
I'd drop the -all_columns - it takes forever and gives you way more than you need. What you need is probably in the first couple columns or in the -most_columns output at the worst. You might also consider using a backup_exit_notify script on your master server to record client, policy,

Re: [Veritas-bu] locate database files in clients system level backups

2009-02-27 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Why not just bplist?Good for a one-off. Otherwise, I'd use bpimagelist to list my images, limited to my filesystem only, full backups, generate a bpid list, then use bpflist to search those for evil file types. -M From:

Re: [Veritas-bu] how to copy backups from data domain totapew/netbackup 6.5

2009-03-09 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Is the data domain a DSU for netbackup? When you say you're backing up to it, can you give more details? -M From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jeff Lightner Sent: Monday, March 09,

Re: [Veritas-bu] how to copy backups from data domain totapew/netbackup 6.5

2009-03-09 Thread Donaldson, Mark
with other arrangements but easier to make this assumption first. It think it's accurate to what you said earlier. Hope this helps. -M From: Hickman, Tony [mailto:tony.hick...@sbmoffshore.com] Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 1:16 PM To: Jeff Lightner; Donaldson, Mark

Re: [Veritas-bu] how to copy backups from data domain totapew/netbackup 6.5

2009-03-09 Thread Donaldson, Mark
To: Donaldson, Mark; Hickman, Tony; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] how to copy backups from data domain totapew/netbackup 6.5 Only problem with the script is OP says he has a Windows master. He'll have to figure out the way VBS or BAT way of doing

Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: [veritas-bu] Labeling Tapes

2009-03-20 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Well, the answer is use bplabel. How is it not working for you? From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Hudson, Steve Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 7:33 AM To:

Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: [veritas-bu] Labeling Tapes

2009-03-20 Thread Donaldson, Mark
don't use robtest - use tpreq tpunmount. NB's vm manager tracks that better. From: Hudson, Steve [mailto:steve.hud...@ironmountain.com] Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 2:08 PM To: Donaldson, Mark; veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Stuck Media

2009-04-01 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Have you tried vmoprcmd -reset ? http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/269577.htm From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 11:50 AM To:

Re: [Veritas-bu] Stuck Media

2009-04-01 Thread Donaldson, Mark
While I'm thinking of it, this (vmoprcmd -reset) may be a good way to clear the drive rather than using robtest. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan Sent: Tuesday, March

Re: [Veritas-bu] Media server choices

2009-04-06 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Direct SCSI access through VMware is difficult and I'm not even sure you'd want to try it through a virtual device. I'd recommend a bare-metal build for a media server. -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu]

Re: [Veritas-bu] Tape Destruction

2009-04-06 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Pull! BLAM! ;) -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Heathe Kyle Yeakley Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 9:51 AM To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Tape Destruction Hello

Re: [Veritas-bu] Commands to list backup images on a basic diskbackup filesystem?

2009-04-13 Thread Donaldson, Mark
bpimmedia works fine for this. just give it the unix path of the disk storage unit. -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Rongsheng Fang Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 11:29 AM To:

Re: [Veritas-bu] backup was partially successful. - error codes1

2009-04-15 Thread Donaldson, Mark
With unix Permission Denied is usually an NFS mount thing. I'll bet you a nickle it's on an NFS mount and the permissions in the export table on the NFS server aren't allowing root on the client to function with full permissions in that mountpoint. (root=clientip) -M

Re: [Veritas-bu] Client Listing

2009-04-16 Thread Donaldson, Mark
semi-ugly but you can get it out of the image database: bpimagelist -d 01/01/1970 | awk '$1==IMAGE {print $2}' | sort -u From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jimenez, Daniel Sent:

Re: [Veritas-bu] Command to use for soon to be expired tapes

2009-04-20 Thread Donaldson, Mark
You could do something like this... bpmedialist -mlist -rl 9 -l|awk '{print $13,$7,$1}'|sort -n -k1 -k2 This will print, respectively, pool number, tape expiration date (epoch time) and tape number. You'll have to do a little conversion after the fact to convert pool number to pool name and

[Veritas-bu] LTO1 cleaning tapes in LTO2 drive. Good?

2009-04-20 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Subject line pretty much says it all - we have a handful of LTO1 cleaning tapes and no more of that kind of drive. I've got other cleaning tapes marked as good for both kinds of drives so I suspect we're good to use the LTO1 cleaners in LTO2 drives. Any issues you guys know of? -M

Re: [Veritas-bu] Total Client Data

2009-04-22 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Hi, The source of the raw information is the image database. Here's a script for you. Note, this doesn't take into account multiple copies of one image - it's just a total of the image sizes, ie: sourced data. If you want to have total data written onto the tape, multiply the $19 param by

Re: [Veritas-bu] Restore running too slow

2009-04-22 Thread Donaldson, Mark
USB drives can be very slow. Have you tried restoring the files to a hard drive and seeing if the problem lies there? How are backup speeds on that same client? Lastly, are the backups heavily multiplexed? That'll slow restores as the tape has to be seeked to find the distributed backup

[Veritas-bu] Inline Tape Copy vs Storage Unit Groups (and other ITC wierdness)

2009-04-23 Thread Donaldson, Mark
If I create a policy that uses inline-tape-copy to make an offsite copy, I see two pieces of wierdness that I don't understand. The first is that if I select a storage unit group for my destination, the tape pool, tape owner, etc. grays out. It's not like my tape pools are tied to a specific

Re: [Veritas-bu] Inline Tape Copy vs Storage Unit Groups (and otherITC wierdness)

2009-04-24 Thread Donaldson, Mark
that it is not a best practice to do so. Depending on what version of NetBackup you have and your business requirements, you may want to look into disk-staging/duplication (6.0), Storage Lifecycle Policy (6.5.x) to create multiple copies. /Girish - Original Message From: Donaldson, Mark

Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO4 recognized as DLT

2009-05-05 Thread Donaldson, Mark
I think this is a mistake. Media type (hcart, dlt, hcart2) etc is just a label - part of the media database. It exists per tape regardless of the backups on it. Volume Pool is what's usually assigned through backup creation. You can change the media type (via the vmchange) command regardless

Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO4 recognized as DLT

2009-05-05 Thread Donaldson, Mark
. From: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com [mailto:judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 3:38 PM To: Donaldson, Mark; mvdb...@stortech.co.za; VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] LTO4 recognized as DLT You also have the issue

Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO4 recognized as DLT

2009-05-06 Thread Donaldson, Mark
So this is a new Netbackup install and the old DLT tapes are from the old installation? Is using the old catalog as a base for the new a possiblity? Then you wouldn't have to import any tapes. To read the DLT tape, you'll need a DLT drive, of course. Why not just label them as DLT just for

[Veritas-bu] OT: HP Virtual Training?

2009-05-13 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Off-Topic but you guys are the biggest group of Admins I know. I need to take an HP training course. It's offered 1500 miles away in Boston or via a Virtual Classroom. Any of you have experience with HP's virtual training courses? -M ___ Veritas-bu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Policy types

2009-05-15 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Some people swear by the one-client, one-policy method. I'm not one of them. The only reason I can see to do this is the ease of turning off backups for a client. In 9+ years of doing Netbackup, I think I've done this less than a half-dozen times. Even with multiple clients per policy, you can

Re: [Veritas-bu] Licensing questions

2009-05-15 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Use robtest to log into the library and run a mode command. It should tell you the total number of slots.NBU will use whaterver the mode command reports. Our Scaler 10k library reports 130 slots lower than physical slots. The scalars can be bought smaller than physical. You have to pay

Re: [Veritas-bu] Pre / Post Scripts on Backup Jobs with Streams

2009-05-18 Thread Donaldson, Mark
If you backup the database with only one image, the bpstart/bpend_notify will work. However, bpend_notify does run with every image completion, as you've found so it's no good for multi-image backups. bpstart_notify also runs with every image starting up so your preparation script might run

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup, VCB, vRanger Policy Setup

2009-05-18 Thread Donaldson, Mark
You can skip the If statement at the beginning and instead rename the batch file to only work with that particular policy. In general bpstart_notify.batAll policies bpstart_notify.policyname.bat only works for policyname (but for all its scheds) bpstart_notify.policyname.schedname.bat

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup, VCB, vRanger Policy Setup

2009-05-18 Thread Donaldson, Mark
From: Steve Bally [mailto:steve.ba...@radisys.com] Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 2:18 PM To: Donaldson, Mark; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup, VCB, vRanger Policy Setup Mark, Yes, this is a dump from vRanger, then NBU comes by and backs up the files

Re: [Veritas-bu] Pre / Post Scripts on Backup Jobs with Streams

2009-05-19 Thread Donaldson, Mark
/post schedule jobs. HTH - Mark From: WEAVER, Simon (external) [mailto:simon.wea...@astrium.eads.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 12:10 AM To: Donaldson, Mark; Dustin Damour; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Pre / Post Scripts on Backup

Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows Client Status 58 with a difference

2009-05-20 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Error 58 is a can't connect error. Err 57 is if it can't reverse correctly and authenticate the server or if the list of allowed servers in the client is wrong. We just pounded a bunch of these to death on a handful of servers. A quick test is to telnet host bpcd from the master server. If you

Re: [Veritas-bu] How to configure multiplexing?

2009-05-20 Thread Donaldson, Mark
There's two ways to do this, one is dependable, the other is less so. The undependable way, and I don't recommend it, is to configure media sharing and then time all the times to occur at different times. With luck, they'd all grab the shared tape, mount it locally, and write all the backups

Re: [Veritas-bu] Successful Backup Report

2009-05-21 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Can you give an example of what you're looking for? -M -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of NBU Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 1:49 AM To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU Subject: [Veritas-bu]

Re: [Veritas-bu] Successful Backup Report

2009-05-26 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Here's what I use. I gives output that looks like below, totals by client, then broken down by policy. Run it without options for a 24-hour report or specify a number of hours on the command line to see greater depth. Change the y...@yourdomain.com at the top of the script for your mail

Re: [Veritas-bu] Exclude List in Ver 6.5.2 (on Linux)

2009-05-26 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Exclusion files are client-side only. If you put one on the master server, it doesn't function for the clients. Certainly it's something we, the user community, have been requesting for a very long time. -M -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Fedora client install problem

2009-05-26 Thread Donaldson, Mark
standard for my 6.5.3 install now are: libacl.i386 libstdc++.i386 xinetd (The last seems obvious but for some reason it's missing on half our servers). From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On

Re: [Veritas-bu] Successful Backup Report

2009-06-07 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Apologies for the slow response - I was on vacation. My earlier message to this board has the script as an attachment rpt_client_totals. It's a shell script, I don't use extensions as a rule on scripts. -M -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Can you reassure my understanding.

2009-06-08 Thread Donaldson, Mark
I have done a full system restore, or attempted to, and it doesn't work. Somewhere along the way, you start over-writing the library files linked into the running bpbkar executable and then the restore will die. BMR is an exception, but just doing a full restore from root downward doesn't

Re: [Veritas-bu] Can you reassure my understanding.

2009-06-09 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Kraizman Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:29 PM To: Donaldson, Mark Cc: dave.mark...@fjserv.net; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; John Nardello Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Can you reassure my understanding. 2009/6/8 Donaldson, Mark mark.donald...@staples.com I have done a full system

Re: [Veritas-bu] Client version

2009-06-10 Thread Donaldson, Mark
A little late to this party but here's another version. #!/bin/ksh PATH=$PATH:/usr/openv/netbackup/bin:/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd echo Client \t OS Level \t Release echo =\t =\t === for c in `bpplclients -allunique

Re: [Veritas-bu] Client version

2009-06-10 Thread Donaldson, Mark
...@administaff.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 9:19 AM To: Donaldson, Mark; sreynol...@semprautilities.com; ewi...@ewilts.org Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Client version Note on Marks script, the command does not show the fourth position on the version 6.5.3.1 all I am

Re: [Veritas-bu] Client version

2009-06-10 Thread Donaldson, Mark
}else{r=p} printf(%-22s\t%-25s\t%s\n,'$c',os,r)} ' done From: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com [mailto:judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:53 AM To: Donaldson, Mark; sreynol...@semprautilities.com; ewi

Re: [Veritas-bu] Keeping more job history in the Activity Monitor

2009-06-10 Thread Donaldson, Mark
It's controlled by two lines in your bp.conf file on your master server: KEEP_JOBS_HOURS = 192 KEEP_JOBS_SUCCESSFUL_HOURS = 192 I keep 9 days with mine. -M From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup all files in a folder but not any subfolders

2009-06-10 Thread Donaldson, Mark
NB recurses by default. It's hard to stop. You'd have to do this by using an exclude file on the client, I suspect. If your filelist includes: /top/dir_to_backup You might try to exclude /top/dir_to_backup/*/ That might do it. I've never tried it, though. Make sure the trailing slash is

Re: [Veritas-bu] Client version

2009-06-11 Thread Donaldson, Mark
I get it all the time. No worries. -Mark From: WEAVER, Simon (external) [mailto:simon.wea...@astrium.eads.net] Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:17 AM To: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com; Donaldson, Mark; sreynol...@semprautilities.com; ewi...@ewilts.org Cc

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup all files in a folder but not any subfolders

2009-06-11 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Per policy excludes are implemented already. Have been since at least v3. Client Global: /usr/openv/netbackup/exclude_list Policy (all scheds): /usr/openv/netbackup/exclude_list.policyname Policy Sched: /usr/openv/netbackup/exclude_list.policyname.schedname -M -Original Message-

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup all files in a folder but not any subfolders

2009-06-11 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Yes, they're on the client, but they can be limited to function on that client for only one policy or policy sched combo. -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of dbergen Sent: Thursday, June 11,

[Veritas-bu] Exchange Agent

2009-06-15 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Hi all, We're using the Netapp Snapmanager for Exchange software to make Exchange backups right now. We use it to quiesce Exchange in some way and create a Netapp snapshot of the drives. Those drives are mounted to another NT server and backed up as drive letters. The upshot of this is

Re: [Veritas-bu] Howto remove disk media server from disk staging

2009-06-17 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Decommissioning an NB 6.5 Media server: http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/306838.htm Before you turn it off, though, change your policies to use a storage unit that goes directly to tape then use vault or bpduplicate to copy your remaining disk images to tape. Expire the disk images once

Re: [Veritas-bu] Restore request times out

2009-06-17 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Two potential helps: http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/277049.htm http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/276889.htm -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan Sent:

Re: [Veritas-bu] Macintosh Client for Netbackup 6.5

2009-06-22 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Aww, heck. You don't need to backup Mac computers. Everything made by Apple is perfect. If a file gets deleted you don't need it. Trust it - it's a apple. It anticipated your future disuse of this file and just proactively took care it for you. Oh - and the big black box that appeared in

Re: [Veritas-bu] How to check logs

2009-06-23 Thread Donaldson, Mark
If it's being manipulated via the GUI, here's one way. Write a wrapper (I use a Unix alias) for jnbSA that has something like this in it like this: jnbSA -l $HOME/jnbSA/jnbsa.1016.log -lc ..or... jnbSA -l /usr/openv/netbackup/logs/jnbsa/$USER.`date +%y$%M%D`.$$.log ...or similar.

Re: [Veritas-bu] modify backup_exit_notify.sh script

2009-06-23 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Unless you're doing something special in yours, the backup_exit_notify (note - no .sh suffix) doesn't send email by default. -M From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Mark Glazerman Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 12:53

Re: [Veritas-bu] modify backup_exit_notify.sh script

2009-06-23 Thread Donaldson, Mark
The emails on NB are per-image. They don't take into consideration the retry attempts. There's no built-in features for that. -M From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Fernandes, Eustace Sent: Tuesday, June 23,

Re: [Veritas-bu] modify backup_exit_notify.sh script

2009-06-24 Thread Donaldson, Mark
By default, though, Netbackup is pouring email out for every backup through a different script or executable which I've never found. By default, the mail lines below are commented out. If anyone knows Netbackup's usual facility for spam, I'd love to look at it to see if it could be

Re: [Veritas-bu] 2 Masters and only 1 tape library - DR Exercise comingup

2009-06-29 Thread Donaldson, Mark
You're not going to do it without partitioning the library. Hints in another thread suggest it might be possible by using a another software package as an interface but stock Netbackup will limit you to having a library connected to one, and only one, master server. The Master Server holds your

Re: [Veritas-bu] SSO Option for LTO3 drives

2009-06-30 Thread Donaldson, Mark
If a drive is visible to one and only one server because of zoning , then SSO isn't necessary. SSO is used to share a single drive among multiple media servers. Each server uses it in turn but then releases it after use to be used by a different server. While you may be licensed for SSO, what

Re: [Veritas-bu] SSO Option for LTO3 drives

2009-06-30 Thread Donaldson, Mark
The way I understand SSO, is if you're using anything more complicated than a stand alone tape drive, then you need SSO (I could be totally incorrect here, this is me trying to summarize SSO in 20 words or less). This isn't the case. SSO is used to share a single tape drive among multiple

Re: [Veritas-bu] Million file backup issue

2009-06-30 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Have you increased your timers yet? Client_read_timeout springs to mind... -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Dave Markham Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 9:11 AM To:

Re: [Veritas-bu] What Is The Purpose For My Brocade Switch?

2009-07-01 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Direct connect fiber is possible but there's no device sharing this way. This may not be an issue if you don't have SSO licenses. However, frankly, switches add flexibility for later changes - if I had a switch available to me, I'd use it even if I ended up with point-to-point zones built in

Re: [Veritas-bu] mounting lto3 tapes to lto4

2009-07-02 Thread Donaldson, Mark
LTO1 LTO2 is where I had my crossover point. You can go into the media database (vmchange) change the media type on the LTO3 tapes to be the same as your LTO4. The drives will read write these tapes, they'll dumb down to the format automatically. I marked mine with a comment that reminded me

Re: [Veritas-bu] Incorrect Storage Unit

2009-07-02 Thread Donaldson, Mark
If you did it too fast, changes to policies can take up to 10 minutes to be implemented (by default). -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Heathe Kyle Yeakley Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009

Re: [Veritas-bu] Any thoughts on this hack to avoid import?

2009-07-16 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Force the assignment? vmquery -assignbyid From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Dean Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 6:49 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Any thoughts on this hack to

[Veritas-bu] Second Device Path

2009-07-22 Thread Donaldson, Mark
According to the Whitepaper... http://eval.symantec.com/mktginfo/enterprise/white_papers/b-whitepaper_i mplementing_highly_available_dr_with_veritas_netbackup_01_08_13599373.pd f ...the Second Device Path can be used as an Active/Passive failover in the event of primary path failure (to your

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backups are active, but nothing is being backed up

2009-08-05 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Yeah - what the other guys implied. There's lots of possibilities, first stop is the details under the job viewer - that should tell you what the job is waiting on. -M -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu]

Re: [Veritas-bu] Drive utilisation in Netbackup

2009-08-13 Thread Donaldson, Mark
I got a script for this (tracking graphing drive utilization) but it's slightly hosed now. Give me a bit and I'll post it out again. -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of

Re: [Veritas-bu] Generate list of file systems in a Policy[...]

2009-08-24 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Checkout the bpcoverage command. It compares the filesystems on a client versus the policy list and will tell you what is and isn't backed up and by what policy. bpcoverage -c client_name -M From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Hi

2009-08-25 Thread Donaldson, Mark
that's waaay to complicated for a simple email. There's a whole manual on vaulting - probably best to dig into that. Simply put, though, it's the automated duplication, ejection, reporting of backup images and tapes. I use it to create scheduled jobs that destage backups from disk-storage

Re: [Veritas-bu] Expired media not returning to SCRATCH Vault

2009-09-15 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Nope - shouldn't work that way. If you look at the tape with vmquery, does it have an Assigned date? Are you confusing volume expiration (tape age, visible with vmquery) with image expiration (visible with bpmedialist)? -M -Original Message- From:

Re: [Veritas-bu] Active Tapes Had Bar Codes Removed

2009-09-16 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Just inserting them into a drive should be enough. After they're in, look at vmoprcmd -d ds on the media server that sees that drive. The ExtMID is the External Media ID - supplied via the robot's interface - the RecMID is the on-tape media ID - it's the from the header info. When you find it,

Re: [Veritas-bu] Fragment size for LTO4 on NBU 6.x

2009-09-16 Thread Donaldson, Mark
I'm using a 10G fragment size. Just a guess at a ballpark figure between too small too large. -M -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of william.d.br...@gsk.com Sent: Wednesday, September 16,

Re: [Veritas-bu] Fragment size for LTO4 on NBU 6.x

2009-09-16 Thread Donaldson, Mark
And database size. Every fragment is another record in the image database. -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 7:38 AM To: Justin

Re: [Veritas-bu] Bpplist Policy Script

2009-09-28 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Heh - funny how my old scripts pop up on here every now and then... This one is still good but I had to go to gawk on Solaris 8 instead of awk. I've got a couple policies now that have listings large enough to bomb-out the elderly awk on Sol 8. -M From:

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup server solaris X86 with VCB

2009-09-28 Thread Donaldson, Mark
I suspect politics over technology. The LVM layer in windows, I believe, is a port of Veritas VM. I suspect that there's a deal that says All new tech must work on Windows - since it's hard to port from Windows to *nix, it tends to say on Windows. Just guessing. -Original Message-

Re: [Veritas-bu] bpduplicate help

2009-10-07 Thread Donaldson, Mark
If they're run too closely together, it, for some reason, picks a new tape - it must be a way to delays caused by mounting positioning. I've seen this in backups, too. On my third backup of the set, it picked the first tape. One way around this is to put a list of images to be backed up in a

[Veritas-bu] Converting stand-alone Master to clustered Master

2009-10-13 Thread Donaldson, Mark
Page 14 of the NB High Availability guide: = NetBackup does not support the conversion of an existing non-failover NetBackup server to a failover NetBackup server. Contact Symantec Enterprise Technical Support. = Huh? Should be easy, I'd think. Why would I need Tech Support?

  1   2   >