RE: [Veritas-bu] best practice

2005-11-14 Thread Jeff Lightner
Assuming you meant to say on the disk array side or box side I'd say the array side. Hardware RAID is more efficient than software RAID because the hardware typically has its own caching and CPUs. Having said that I will note that on most enterprise level systems you'll see hardware RAID but

RE: [Veritas-bu] ARchiving Old Data

2005-12-05 Thread Jeff Lightner
? When I used to have archiving of oracle logs in NB it wouldn't delete the file until the 2nd time it was backed up to tape. Since we were also doing log shipping and backed up both from the primary and standby databases we typically had 4 copies of the logs at any given point. -Original

RE: [Veritas-bu] Large Oracle RMAN DB Backup Question

2005-12-05 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Large Oracle RMAN DB Backup Question I havent done it but my coworker here has indicated several times that RMAN isnt good for hot backup of large DBs because it does stair stepping of the tables and takes forever to backup due to this. Perhaps others on the list have more details

[Veritas-bu] Windows backup failing to Unix Server - Succeeds to Windows server

2005-12-30 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Windows backup failing to Unix Server - Succeeds to Windows server An odd one here. Our Windows Admin has attempted to setup a Windows machine to be backed up by our Unix Master. When he does he gets a Status 59 which means the server isnt recognized by the client. When he uses his

RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.1 and autofs/Linux

2006-01-11 Thread Jeff Lightner
I wouldn't backup via autofs. First why backup via NFS rather than backing up the filesystem from its native host? You still have the network impact but don't have to worry about NFS' overhead and quirks. Second if you really have to do NFS why do autofs? You could set up a script to mount

RE: [Veritas-bu] exclude list on Linux client

2006-01-12 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Message For Unix/Linux clients your exclude list file name should contain the name of the policy. i.e. If the policy is named HOSTNAME-OS rather than just creating: exclude_list You should create: exclude_list.HOSTNAME-OS From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [Veritas-bu] Oracle RAC backups

2006-01-12 Thread Jeff Lightner
We did NOT give the DBAs access to the Netbackup GUI. We tell them the name of the policies and they include them in their RMAN scripts. You HAVE to run RMAN because Netbackup and Oracle only support RMAN for the OCFS filesystems used on Linux. (We didn't do ASM - suspect its true for that as

RE: [Veritas-bu] login as unix user

2006-01-26 Thread Jeff Lightner
Sudo is a great idea for using utilities but any Unix Admin worth his/her salt isn't going to give you a root shell via sudo - it defeats the whole point of not giving out the root account in the first place. The audit objections to having root is not the specific account but the total power over

[Veritas-bu] Restricting tapes to a single stream

2006-01-31 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Restricting tapes to a single stream Is it possible to setup a policy in such a way that any stream will not use a tape previously used within another stream of the same backup? Background: We run our Production DB backup using 3 streams. This backup is used for doing refreshes to

RE: [Veritas-bu] Restricting tapes to a single stream

2006-01-31 Thread Jeff Lightner
as a single stream). From: Greenberg, Katherine A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 10:22 AM To: Jeff Lightner; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Restricting tapes to a single stream Why don't you try to identify and repair what

RE: [Veritas-bu] Restricting tapes to a single stream

2006-01-31 Thread Jeff Lightner
, January 31, 2006 11:08 AM To: Jeff Lightner Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Restricting tapes to a single stream Well, there's no setting of this kind, so you'll need other workarounds... As you mentioned, single stream backup. Not very desirable, so that's out

RE: [Veritas-bu] Error 58 got me stumped

2006-02-06 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Error 58 got me stumped Interestingly Ive had the same issue. You need to look at the admin guide discussion on firewalls. Although bpcd does the original connection there is a call back port opened that is likely blocked by your internal firewall. (Im assuming you have one

RE: [Veritas-bu] Error 58 got me stumped

2006-02-07 Thread Jeff Lightner
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chapman, Scott Sent: February 6, 2006 12:17 PM To: Jeff Lightner; Hindle, Greg; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Error 58 got me stumped check out the bpclient command. this will allow you to use vnet without boucing the masters

RE: [Veritas-bu] Backing up Remote Sites

2006-02-15 Thread Jeff Lightner
You can backup across your WAN but it will be very slow and will impact other traffic. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of j. okabayashi Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 1:44 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Backing up

RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1 Error Code 58 and Loss of Sequence Numbers

2006-02-21 Thread Jeff Lightner
to in my working DMZ config.) Note: You have to do the selection for each DMZ client you add to the list under the Master's Client Attributes box. -Original Message- From: Paul Keating [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 8:47 AM To: Brooks, Jason; Jeff Lightner

RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.1 and checkpoints

2006-02-22 Thread Jeff Lightner
I wonder if the type of failure determines this. If the tape is frozen because NB suspects it to be bad one probably doesn't want it to just continue from that point. If the tape was truly bad then you'd end up with only a fraction of a backup. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Veritas-bu] Unable to SCSI unload drive

2006-02-28 Thread Jeff Lightner
I've seen this on HP-UX. We have fibre bridges going to the SCSI drives and usually booting the fibre bridge and power cycling the drive takes care of it. In fact just power cycling the drive has taken care of it on a couple of occasions. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Veritas-bu] Unable to cancel queued job

2006-03-01 Thread Jeff Lightner
Whether it's a kill -9 of a process or a Glock 9 used on a fellow admin you're likely to have problems afterwards that make you question the wisdom of the kill. :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon Sent: Wednesday, March 01,

RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU Java GUI for Unix

2006-03-02 Thread Jeff Lightner
Of course if you're using a Windows workstation like most people there is a Java client you can install there rather than running the GUI directly from Solaris. You just use the one on your workstation to login to your Solaris server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Veritas-bu] Third times the charm (I hope)

2006-03-06 Thread Jeff Lightner
The restore log itself isn't telling you anything? Typically I see things like: Restore started 03/04/2006 07:11:38 07:11:43 (109902.xxx) Restore job id 109902 will require 3 images. 07:11:43 (109902.xxx) Media id SU0188 is needed for the restore. 07:11:43 (109902.xxx) Media id SU1532 is

RE: [Veritas-bu] Weird restore problem

2006-03-22 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Weird restore problem Have you verified the tape isnt in use by another backup or duplication job? What does vmquery report about the tape? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hindle, Greg Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 9:41 AM To:

RE: [Veritas-bu] SAN Media Servers

2006-04-03 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Message It shouldnt fail so long as your policy is using the virtual name rather than the physical name. Ideally you should have different backups configured: 1) policy-server1 = Backs up the OS and other local filesystems unique to this physical host 2) policy-server2 = Backs

RE: [Veritas-bu] Issues with NetBackup after applying Solaris patches

2006-04-06 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Issues with NetBackup after applying Solaris patches Havent used Solaris in a while but this reminds me of a time I did an update on some Solaris production servers and found the patch included a default st.conf that overwrote the specific entries wed made for our AIT libraries.

RE: [Veritas-bu] Separate NIC

2006-04-06 Thread Jeff Lightner
For the separate backup network we simply add entries to the hosts file on the backup master. The entries added there typically just have b appended to the real host name. The appended to hostname is then used as the client instead of the real hostname. Example: Real hostname, exchange1,

RE: [Veritas-bu] Issues with NetBackup after applying Solaris patches

2006-04-06 Thread Jeff Lightner
Support organizations not coming up with obvious solutions is something I'm fairly used to. In fact I've had occasions where I theorized as to the correct answer but was told by support that wasn't it only to later try it in desperation and find that it was indeed the fix. Perhaps Katherine's

RE: [Veritas-bu] Catalog question

2006-04-14 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Message It means that you would have to recover from whichever tape was last used. The first backup uses the first tape. The second backup uses the second tape. The third backup uses the first tape again. And so on If you had a failure after the fourth time you did the backup

RE: RE: [Veritas-bu] Hardware compression not working

2006-04-18 Thread Jeff Lightner
Didn't respond earlier because I thought your post regarding Sun only. On HP the device's minor specifies settings of the drive's device entries - it will have several. You need to make sure your minor numbers are for the Best density which would include compression. Also as noted by

RE: [Veritas-bu] Way to restore data using alternative media server?

2006-04-20 Thread Jeff Lightner
FORCE_MEDIA_SERVER entry in bp.conf would be sufficient for the same drives on another media server in the same SSO config. By newer and cleaner drives it sounds as if you're using a different storage unit so I'm not sure what that would require. The entry in bp.conf would be:

RE: [Veritas-bu] using a license textdile

2006-04-24 Thread Jeff Lightner
From the bpminlicense man page: The bpminlicense utility manages a NetBackup license file. The preferred method to manage NetBackup licenses is to use the Help License Keys panel in the NetBackup Administration console. For UNIX servers, you may use the get_license_key(1M) utility

RE: [Veritas-bu] FQDNs or Not ? [recommendations please]

2006-05-01 Thread Jeff Lightner
Of course for facilities where you don't have and don't expect to have more than 6 domains this isn't an issue. Therefore using /etc/resolv.conf is adequate for most environments though I'll have to admit I usually use the FQDN. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [Veritas-bu] FQDNs or Not ? [recommendations please]

2006-05-01 Thread Jeff Lightner
host name with a b appended). We don't put those entries in DNS as they are used by nothing other than the backup master and we don't want any other traffic on those NICs. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 11:06 AM To: Jeff

RE: [Veritas-bu] can SAN media server restore clients?

2006-05-04 Thread Jeff Lightner
, 2006 3:09 AM To: Jeff Lightner; Bob Stump; Marianne Berg; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] can SAN media server restore clients? SSO = Shared Storage Option Jeff :-) Allows Servers (Media as example) to share 1 Library! Regards Simon Weaver 3rd

RE: [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support

2006-05-10 Thread Jeff Lightner
I'm with you. Linux for enterprise is a reality. RedHat and Suse are the two main commercial variants. We use RHEL here and they used it at Cisco when I worked there as well. Not supporting the two main commercial distros is showing a lack of recognizing reality. My company has no plans to

RE: [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support

2006-05-11 Thread Jeff Lightner
This makes the assumption someone at Symantec actually looks at these things. I don't know of anyone who has posted on this link that has ever seen a response. I know I haven't. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tristan Ball Sent:

RE: [Veritas-bu] Can this be done?

2006-05-12 Thread Jeff Lightner
Thats not the culture of this list although it is on others I am subscribed to. The downside Ive seen to what you propose is that many times people do not post the summary so one finds more questions than solutions in the archives. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Veritas-bu] Solaris vs. HPUX

2006-05-15 Thread Jeff Lightner
Ive run Netbackup on HP-UX for years and dont see many major issues. Ive also run it on Solaris though it has been a while since I did that. It always seemed to have more issues on Solaris than HP-UX though once properly configured it seemed to be acceptable on Solaris. There just seems to

RE: [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support

2006-05-16 Thread Jeff Lightner
There IS dollar savings even if you go the commercial Linux variants and pay for support as compared to commercial Unix (especially the RISC based solutions). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Keating Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 12:06

RE: [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support

2006-05-16 Thread Jeff Lightner
-Original Message- From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 12:49 PM To: Paul Keating; Greenberg, Katherine A; Dhotre, Shekhar; List Veritas List Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support There IS dollar savings even if you go the commercial Linux

RE: [Veritas-bu] Backups running twice during the backup window

2006-05-16 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Message No DBAs are demons subordinate to the REAL spawns of satan Developers. It has always amazed me that in an environment where one runs an OS used by thousands or organizations, a DB used by thousands of organizations and tools used by thousands of organizations in which

RE: [Veritas-bu] Symantec and Linux support

2006-05-16 Thread Jeff Lightner
the RISC systems are usually made by the same people making the Unix that runs on it this discussion is usually internal to the vendor. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 1:32 PM To: Jeff Lightner; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL

RE: [Veritas-bu] Data retentions

2006-05-17 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Message SOX may only require 3 years but dont forget for taxing authorities (IRS, states etc) they may go back 7 years. Also for some lawsuits data may be required that is older than 3 years old. We typically do yearly backups with infinite retention here of our Production database.

[Veritas-bu] Experiences with DataDomain

2006-06-22 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Experiences with DataDomain We just saw a demo of the DataDomain technology. Anyone using this and if so how? What are your experiences? What would you do differently? Are you using it in SAN config like a library or with IP to each host? Jeffrey C. Lightner Unix Systems

Re: [Veritas-bu] StorEdge L700 slow inventory

2006-06-23 Thread Jeff Lightner
The NetBackup inventory compares what NetBackup thinks the robot has to what the robot says it has. This should be relatively quick. I've used the Sun OEMed L700 (StorEdge) in the past with DLT drives and didn't see the kind of delay you're talking about. Here we use the HP OEM and don't see it

Re: [Veritas-bu] AIX - Sybase - SQLBackTrack

2006-06-28 Thread Jeff Lightner
Wow this takes me back... I used to work in a shop where we had Sybase and SQLBackTrack running on HP-UX. There too we ran into issues with shared memory because the Sybase available was compiled as a 32 bit binary. Even though the OS itself was 64 bit we had the limitations of a 32 bit host

Re: [Veritas-bu] status 1 (was: Typical success rates?)

2006-06-30 Thread Jeff Lightner
Status 1 is not a failure UNLESS it's a database backup. For filesystems everywhere I've been we've shown that a status 1 is not a failure but a warning. Unfortunately you won't get Veritas to officially confirm that. Some things I've seen cause a status 1: Open files. Files changed between

Re: [Veritas-bu] CLI or GUI

2006-06-30 Thread Jeff Lightner
For activity monitoring you can't beat the GUI. For newbies (and tasks done infrequently) the GUI is nice as it often lets you figure out what to do from its menu selections. For experienced users the CLI is more flexible because you can give the flags you want to commands and can also do

Re: [Veritas-bu] CLI or GUI

2006-06-30 Thread Jeff Lightner
the switch. Pretty neat, actually. Paul -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Lightner Sent: June 30, 2006 1:19 PM To: Keith W; Veritas List Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] CLI or GUI For activity monitoring you can't beat the GUI

Re: [Veritas-bu] CLI or GUI

2006-06-30 Thread Jeff Lightner
I'll have to agree. Left it out of my prior post but I do usually use the GUI for policies administration. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 2:20 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 4.5 Unix HPUX

2006-07-05 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Message Just putting the drives in wouldnt make them available to the OS (HP-UX). You can cheat and simply reboot the HP-UX host or you can do insf e to make it install the devices. ioscan fn will show you the hardware your HP-UX sees. Make sure the drives dont show as UNCLAIMED

Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.0 MP3 available

2006-07-05 Thread Jeff Lightner
Thats because all their binaries have a new system call that executes a shell routine: if ! $0 then exit 0 # Dont let the user know it really failed fi J From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stefanos Monovasios Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2000

Re: [Veritas-bu] Congratulations Italy

2006-07-10 Thread Jeff Lightner
From the American perspective: Was there some kind of game being played this weekend? Just kidding :-) Congrats to Italy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 2:04 AM To: 'Alessandro da Silveira';

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Speeds Revisited

2006-07-13 Thread Jeff Lightner
Are you sure you didn't intend THIS one for Justin :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 9:29 AM To: 'Brooks, Jason'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Speeds

Re: [Veritas-bu] Unix Master, Windows Media server possible?

2006-07-17 Thread Jeff Lightner
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 7:41 AM To: Drunen van, Marcel Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Unix Master, Windows Media server possible? On Mon,

Re: [Veritas-bu] Master Server Hostname Change

2006-07-17 Thread Jeff Lightner
We moved from an HP-UX 11.0 server to HP-UX 11.11. Due to this we were able to move the catalogs etc... without having to reimport media. To dodge the server name issue we just added another Name with old IP to the same NIC as the primary interface. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

Re: [Veritas-bu] Updating UNIX clients from the master server.

2006-07-19 Thread Jeff Lightner
The problem is that fuser doesn't always show everything. For example sometimes if you are running as a user and cd to a directory then su to another user and cd out of the directory fuser won't show what is busying it out. lsof on the other hand will. I found out about lsof years ago and now

Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL

2006-08-02 Thread Jeff Lightner
You might want to in order to do database refreshes by restoring one machines database backup to another's database. We currently do that with tape using the FORCE_MEDIA_RESTORE option in our SSO setup. I don't think having separate disks would eliminate this need unless you wanted to do a 2

Re: [Veritas-bu] buffering in FC/SCSI router

2006-08-08 Thread Jeff Lightner
We have been using the FC/SCSI bridges on our STK 700 for a few years. We dont have the feature turned on. They dont seem to cause us problems so I wouldnt say to get rid of them. The only issue we saw with these was when we tried to add them to our Linux servers to be used as media

Re: [Veritas-bu] hanging backups.

2006-08-17 Thread Jeff Lightner
Is the master a Windows machine as well? If its Unix/Linux you can download and install tcpdump which will let you specify interface and IP you wish to monitor. You can use ethereal to look at the packets captured by tcpdump. Not sure if there's a Windoze equivalent or version of those tools.

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.0 MP3 Scheduler Problems?

2006-08-17 Thread Jeff Lightner
I'm starting to get the impression that in 6 NBU = No BackUps and MP = Mangled Patch. :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Major, Rusty Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 11:32 AM To: Ed Wilts; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re:

Re: [Veritas-bu] What Is the Command for Re-reading the bp.conf FileWithout Restarting the NetBackup Service

2006-08-25 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Message Sure NOW this gets post. Last week on writing a script to update bp.conf with sed I had to actually read documentation to figure this out. :--( From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clooney, David Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 5:53 AM To:

[Veritas-bu] queued job never going away

2006-08-25 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: queued job never going away In the activity monitor on a few occasions weve seen jobs staying queued forever. Is there a way to get rid of such queued jobs? Canceling them or deleting them doesnt seem to help. It appears they occur when a client initiated action occurs and goes

Re: [Veritas-bu] queued job never going away

2006-08-25 Thread Jeff Lightner
Sorry - hadn't seen this correction before I responded to your earlier mail. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 1:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jeff Lightner; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] queued

Re: [Veritas-bu] queued job never going away

2006-08-25 Thread Jeff Lightner
:00 PM To: Jeff Lightner; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] queued job never going away Document ID: 278498 http://support.veritas.com/docs/2784984 Matthew Johnson Entertainment Partners Backup Administrator Work - 818-955-6357 Cell - 805-469-8867

Re: [Veritas-bu] Th omas Schulz/DE/Con Sors ist auße r Hau s.

2006-08-29 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Message It must be nice to live in Europe where you get 4-5 week holidays instead of 2 one week vacations.  You actually have time to go somewhere nice.  In a prior life I worked in hotels the last of which was in Grenada and we had mostly British and German tourists there.

Re: [Veritas-bu] Fame at last.

2006-09-07 Thread Jeff Lightner
Yep. My company wouldn't let me interview. Interesting that the guy says he's unaware of the issues. Do you suppose support doesn't report the issues or that he just makes it his business to stay unaware so that he can make comments like that to reporters? I didn't really see them mention the

Re: [Veritas-bu] Fame at last.

2006-09-07 Thread Jeff Lightner
or the grass. Phil 456-3136 -Original Message- From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 9:30 AM To: Mansell, Richard; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Fame at last. Yep. My company wouldn't let me interview. Interesting

Re: [Veritas-bu] Fame at last.

2006-09-07 Thread Jeff Lightner
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Lightner Sent: September 7, 2006 11:18 AM To: Koster, Phil; veritas-bu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Fame at last. I didn't say they had a good case for libel but rather that they might try such a case

Re: [Veritas-bu] Fame at last.

2006-09-07 Thread Jeff Lightner
at such suggestions? -Original Message- From: bob944 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 1:33 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; Jeff Lightner Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Fame at last. From some strange Oliver-Stoneish planet, Jeff Lightner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [Veritas-bu] Fame at last.

2006-09-07 Thread Jeff Lightner
By the way, the September issue of Storage magazine also has upgrade path bumpy for major backup app as the cover story. It is about NBU 6 but seems to focus on one company's strategy for migrating to it and why they are holding off on MP3. For whatever reason, the magazine's site only goes to

Re: [Veritas-bu] Strange Errors

2006-09-08 Thread Jeff Lightner
Weve seen the activity monitor failure when one of the fibre cards in our HP-UX master server has gone away. On HP we can reset the fibre card with the server still on line using fcmsutil. Not sure if its possible in Linux or how to do it if so. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Veritas-bu] Strange Errors

2006-09-08 Thread Jeff Lightner
are SCSI via fibre bridges including the robotic control. From: Dustin D'Amour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 11:22 AM To: Jeff Lightner; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Strange Errors Is this when the Master and Media

Re: [Veritas-bu] backup 1K files that can't be restored? (was Re: Fameat last.)

2006-09-09 Thread Jeff Lightner
I read it as When it tells you it completed it may have only backed up 1K so is not really complete. At the time I read it I thought it meant 1K data so missed the files. It does seem to beg for some clarification. It does seem it could be read as only backed up 1000 files (or 1024 files) OR it

Re: [Veritas-bu] Using NetBackup directly with tape drive

2006-09-14 Thread Jeff Lightner
Are you backing up the UNIX machines with NetBackup? If so perhaps that's your master and you just need to setup a client backup policy for the Windows server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon Sent: Thursday, September 14,

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup through firewalls

2006-09-15 Thread Jeff Lightner
, 2006 9:11 AM To: Jeff Lightner; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Backup through firewalls -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Lightner Step by step notes I wrote when I did this: FYI the following

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup through firewalls

2006-09-15 Thread Jeff Lightner
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 9:53 AM To: Jeff Lightner; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Backup through firewalls Please post the iptables information. We are adding Linux to our environment and that information would help. Thanks -Original

Re: [Veritas-bu] Linux Shared Memory Configuration

2006-09-19 Thread Jeff Lightner
/etc/sysctl.conf is the correct file. You can learn more about it by reading the man page for it and also the one for sysctl. The available parameters are in /proc/sys/kernel. You can cat each of these to see current value (assuming they are using defaults not shown in sysctl.conf). There are

Re: [Veritas-bu] Stuck tapes survey

2006-09-29 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Stuck tapes survey Assuming robtest works thats how we do it. I have seen occasions where physical intervention was required so we had to have an operator or someone power cycle the drive (or even fish the tape out). No matter whether it is robtest or any other way its important

Re: [Veritas-bu] Stuck tapes survey

2006-09-29 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Stuck tapes survey That was so damn simple its never occurred to me. I always end up doing physical intervention if the master cant talk to it. Hopefully Ill remember this next time. (Knock on wood havent had to do this in 3-4 months after having many issues for a few before that.)

Re: [Veritas-bu] Restoring a 1TB filesystem with 7million files Errors with Allocation Error 10 - Solution?

2006-09-30 Thread Jeff Lightner
My bad. If I'd been paying attention I might have mentioned chatr. FYI: Its not necessary on 64 bit HP-UX. What class of server are you running the 32 bit on? Most servers since the HP 9000 K400 have PA-RISC 2.x processors. PA-RISC 2.x are all capable of running the 64 bit version of 11.11.

Re: [Veritas-bu] Restoring a 1TB filesystem with 7million

2006-10-03 Thread Jeff Lightner
to use them for NBU but did have to use them for Oracle before it had a 64 bit version. -Original Message- From: bob944 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 12:21 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; Jeff Lightner Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Restoring a 1TB

[Veritas-bu] Exclude Examples for Windows

2006-10-10 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Exclude Examples for Windows 1) On Windows how does one setup exclude lists for specific policies? (On UNIX one just creates text files in /usr/openv/netbackup.) 2) Are there any general Windows Excludes (Win 2000, Win 2003, Win NT) that are recommended? 3) Are Windows Media

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backing up Oracle RAC

2006-10-11 Thread Jeff Lightner
We use RMAN for a backup of a smaller (300 GB) DB. It doesn't require stopping the database. For a large (2 TB) Oracle DB we do the BCV thing outlined below. You don't have to run Oracle on the media server because you do a standard rather than an oracle backup. (E.G. do not use RMAN - just

Re: [Veritas-bu] error code 29

2006-10-12 Thread Jeff Lightner
Assuming youre using the oracle backup type rather than the standard. If so Ive never seen it work from the master but always from the client but admit that Ive never delved into it since I could schedule from the client (and usually wanted to anyway for RMAN and SAP backups).

Re: [Veritas-bu] HP-UX Media Server to boot up....

2006-10-12 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Message Of course it depends a lot on the age and class of the equipment. My RP8420 with over 10 TB attached boots much faster than one of my old N Class machines with only 2 TB attached. Also he says HP-UX without mentioning version. 9x? 10x? 11? 11i?. Itanium box or PA-RISC?

Re: [Veritas-bu] HP-UX Media Server to boot up....

2006-10-12 Thread Jeff Lightner
it wasnt meant as an attack but rather to let him know it depends. From: Hampus Lind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 1:27 PM To: Jeff Lightner; 'WEAVER, Simon'; 'ZIMMER, RANDY K [AG/1000]'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: SV: [Veritas-bu] HP-UX Media

Re: [Veritas-bu] HP-UX Media Server to boot up....

2006-10-13 Thread Jeff Lightner
PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 5:28 AM To: Jeff Lightner; Hampus Lind; ZIMMER, RANDY K [AG/1000]; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] HP-UX Media Server to boot up Guys This is slightly off topic of NBU, as it does not sound like this is the problem

Re: [Veritas-bu] \\\\\ Raw FS backup : Sybase IQ /////

2006-10-20 Thread Jeff Lightner
In a prior incarnation I worked at a site that did backups of Sybase on raw devices. Rather than backup the raw devices we used SQL Backtrack software to do the backups. Not sure if it is still available but I believe it (like RMAN) can be run with the DB on line. To have a good point in

Re: [Veritas-bu] NB Backup od mail server in DMZ

2006-10-23 Thread Jeff Lightner
Ports are at the end but you need to modify NBU itself to let it know you only want to use these 2 ports (otherwise it will open random ports): Open Netbackup Java GUI Go to Host Properties Go to Master Servers Double click on the master server In Master Server

Re: [Veritas-bu] Have to get rid of STK L180

2006-10-24 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Have to get rid of STK L180 Donating to a local college or university might work.  If the unit still has value on the books your company can probably use it as a donation for tax purposes. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Johnny Østergaard

Re: [Veritas-bu] Strange speed problem...not the norm

2006-11-02 Thread Jeff Lightner
I'm with David on this. You changed it on the server but did the associated switch port get changed as well? Both sides should be hard set to 100 Full. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clooney, David Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 5.0MP6 on Solaris10

2006-11-06 Thread Jeff Lightner
Finger pointing? Shared memory and Semaphores are interprocess communication (IPCS). The parameters are set in the OS even though it is typically the application that requires the setting. Veritas (Symantec) would rightly say that it is up to Sun to say HOW to set the parameters. Sun would be

Re: [Veritas-bu] Serious problem - DLT7000 tape drives gone not functional

2006-11-06 Thread Jeff Lightner
Your first unload is probably failing because it is still in the process of mounting the tape. After you move a tape in wait a few minutes before trying the unload. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Jackson Sent: Monday, November 06,

Re: [Veritas-bu] How Netbackup handles NFS

2006-11-07 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: How Netbackup handles NFS You would get anything under /data/iwmnt EXCEPT /data/iwmnt/default as the latter is an NFS mount that you told it not to follow. You tried to restore main/internet/x/WORKAREA/2006 from under /data/iwmnt/default so of course it is 0 bytes as you dont

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1 suspend feature not available

2006-11-07 Thread Jeff Lightner
We do suspend/resume fine here on 5.1. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:36 AM To: 'Bobby Williams'; Michael Barrow Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.1

Re: [Veritas-bu] Multipathing San drives

2006-12-04 Thread Jeff Lightner
We actually do dual (or more) HBAs to SAN so we'll have redundance for disks (EMC Clariion/DMX) so can also SEE the tape drives on multiple paths but only use one path for tapes. Having your tape drives stay on line isn't quite as critical as having your disk drives do it so we've never seen the

Re: [Veritas-bu] Unix/Linux file sizes question

2006-12-12 Thread Jeff Lightner
It was true of 32 bit. The limit was actually less than 2 GB. Even without that if the application itself isn't compiled with largefiles support it would hit this limit. Since most Linux is still 32 bit the NBU for it may not have this support. Of course the real issue here is that

Re: [Veritas-bu] Listing files in a backup image or media ID

2006-12-27 Thread Jeff Lightner
Getting list of files in a given backup set use the bplist command: Example: To see all files in the policy ATUBKS-1-ERPDB-DMXBCV that were backed up on 12/04/2006: bplist -k ATUBKS01-ERPDB-DMXBCV -s 12/04/2006 01:00:00 -e 12/05/2006 02:00:00 -R / The -k is policy, -s starttime, -e

Re: [Veritas-bu] Create a private backup LAN

2007-01-04 Thread Jeff Lightner
Here we use the public for some backups and the backup lan for others. We don't put the IPs for the backup LAN in DNS - we just add it to the /etc/hosts file on the master or media server we use as the host for backups. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup and New Daylight Saving Time Rules

2007-01-10 Thread Jeff Lightner
HP when it sent notification for the OS patches also sent notification for the need to update Java including a TZupdater tool for HP-UX. Surprising they'd have a way to do the update and Sun who wrote Java wouldn't. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup and New Daylight Saving Time Rules

2007-01-10 Thread Jeff Lightner
components are only the Admin GUI and the Backup Restore GUI. The rest of NetBackup is distubuted in binary form. That being said, I've always kept our JREs up to date, especially on those mission critical servers. -- M Jeff Lightner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/10/2007

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >