, appears so, I'd like to know what you find. Regards Carl ...
On 3/4/08, Travis Kelley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http
on the clients then the
routing should take care of the rest?
Regards,
Paul Esson
-Original Message-
From: Travis Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 March 2008 16:49
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Media Server with multiple NICS]
You should
We're implementing a san for our tape drives and I was just wondering
where most of you guys have robotic control? We currently use one of
the media servers, but once we have the SAN configured I understand it
can also be on the master. I hesitatae to put it there because our
master is attached
I upgraded to NBU 6.0.
-Jonathan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis
Kelley
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 4:06 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Robotic control host...master/media
We're
We recently purchased a VTL to backup some short retention backups to.
The backups will expire on the VTL and will not be duplicated to tape
or anywhere else for that matter. We also have capacity licensing so
we can create as many virtual tape drives as necessary. I don't
believe multiplexing
If you just delete the robot under devices, all of the media will be
automatically moved to an ejected state. I recently found this out be
accident.
On 5/22/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Today I had an L700 fully loaded with 618 pieces of media go south
on me.
Can you just create.a link or shortcut from the old location pointing
to the new? We did this with a solaris server recently.
On 5/29/08, UlrichJU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are testing an exagrid currently and we originally had the backup jobs
pointing to a storage unit with
We recently did this same thing. Its obviously easiest if you can get
everything staged off first...but if not you do need to make sure the
path to the image doesn't change. Links work well for this if you
need to change the mountpoint though. I can confirm that NB doesn't
need to be shutdown
I think you just need to change the barcode...not the mediaid. You
can do something like vmchange -barcode 01951 -m 001951 to associate
the new barcode with the old mediaid. Media ids don't actually have
anything to do with the barcode. It just so happens that netbackup
bases the media I'd off
I'd have to ask why you would want to use SSO on a VTL? Unless there
is an arbitrary licensing issue you should be able to create as many
drives as you need and assign the appropriate number of drives to each
media server. It should work...but at least in our situation it would
be more expensive
I realize that per the specs this should work, but just wondering if
anyone has actually done it. Has anyone written an encrypted tape
using for instance an IBM drive and restored the encrypted data using
an HP drive? This is assuming you were using a compatible
keystore...for instance Netbackup
http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/FAQ_43_9854.shtm
This link should at least get you pointed in the right direction. It
works great.
A Darren Dunham wrote:
Once upon a time, I think someone posted or emailed me information about
modifying linux iostat so that tape drive throughput is visible.
Here's a little snippit of code we use to grab client versions. You can
wrap this in whatever you want. We have it outputting to an HTML page
that we can quickly reference to see all our client versions.
/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/bptestbpcd -host $CLIENT -verbose
/tmp/testbpcdoutput
Don't forget hardware based encryption using LTO-4 tape drives.
Netbackup 6.5.2 has key management functionality built in. To activate
the hardware encryption on LTO4 using NB6.5.2 after you have created
keys you just write backups to a pool prefixed with ENCR_* for instance
ENCR_Offsite. Using
We have an old solaris 2.7 master/media that we would like to retire.
I would like to copy everything from /usr/openv onto a solaris 10
server and then go through the upgrade process (4.5 - 5.x - 6.x).
Does anyone know if this will work? Will I be able to upgrade the NB
install after copying it
You didn't mention how your performed the restore. Bob already
suggested using the command line. In case you are using the java admin
gui I'll point you over to a technote showing a problem we had where
files weren't restored. I believe this only applies if you are using
the java admin gui.
Hi all. I'm trying to find a solution to a monitoring problem we
have. I would like to create a mechanism to alert when a backup fails
but to only send one alert if multiple streams from a backup fail.
For instance if c: and d: both fail for a particular box, I only want
1 alert. Also if a job
.
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Travis
Kelley
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 9:36 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Real time failure notification
fileset.
It'd been decently effective.
-M
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Travis
Kelley
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 8:36 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject
takes your choice.
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Travis
Kelley
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 8:37 AM
To: Donaldson, Mark; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas
I've used the netbackup KMS and it does work fine, although its sort
of a kluge right now in my opinion. Currently you are limited to 2
keychains and you must use media from a policy whose name begins with
a prefix of ENCR_ (for instance ENCR_Offsite). I've talked with our
account rep and they
Try:
Vmchange -res -multi_eject -rn $robotnum -rt $robottype -rh $robothost
-ml $tapeid -single_cycle
I'm sure all of these switches aren't necessary but it never hurts to
be specific.
On 4/29/09, Baumann, Kevin kbaum...@akamai.com wrote:
All,
I am trying to write a script that will eject
Yoiu are correct that encrypted data is not compressible. Netbackups
client based encrytion knows this and will apply compression first
then encryption. If you use client based encryption, then client
based compression is your onlu option. Hardware compression on your
tape drives will be
Don, thanks for the information on the Netbackup KMS. We have tried
it in testing and as you mentioned, it appears to work perfectly with
IBM LTO4 drives. We spoke with our symantec rep about this and he
indicated that in NB 7 this feature would be moved to a for pay
feature. We have long term
Echoing Peter, I have used the linux bponding with LACP on the switch
to bond 2 gige linls together and was able to get 1800 Mb/s through
them on a Sun x4200. One thing to watch out for is your inter switch
trunks. We also had to upgrade our interswitch trunks, but I assume
your network is
I honestly don't know if its supported but we do this just using the
routing table. We've done this for years without issue.
On 1/14/10, A Darren Dunham ddun...@taos.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:05:01PM +0100, WALLEBROEK Bart wrote:
Is it supported in NBU that a Solaris Master/Media
If you don't care about the LTO4s being able to read the LTO 2 tapes
just change the media type to something different on the 4s (HCART2 or
HCART3). Netbackup automatically will not load the wrong media type
in the wrong drive even if it is technically capable of reading it.
On 1/19/10, Scott
I'm running hardware LTO4 encrytion with 12 IBM LTO's in a Sun L1400
with KMS on nb 6.5.4 and haven't seen any issues.
On 3/4/10, Eagle, Kent kea...@wilmingtontrust.com wrote:
Greetings,
We are running NBU 6.5.3.1 with a Quantum (ADIC) i2000 Scalar library.
We currently have a bunch of LTO2
I agree with Martin here on them working in some cases. I have and
EMC Clariion with 45 1TB SATA disks and I can tell you it screams. I
routienly see over 600MB/S out of the array wjile destaging. Sure, I
have a larger and potentially smarter array than some but to say
they don't ever work is
I have a 1TB and backups do take a while...but perhaps the most
annoying thing for me is an images on media report. The full catalog
has to be scanned anytime you look for what images are on a tape.
Overall though there is no problem with a large catalog as long as you
manage it properly and have
Data domain also has a limit to the amount of data one of their units
can track but its fairly high. If you need more than 32TB of deduped
data in PD you do need to deploy a seperate puredisk environment. Then
PD just splits the hash space into chunks and stores data on whichever
node it hases
This is not true (yet). We've recently talked do DD engineering in addition
to trying it ourselves and confirmed both ways that optimized synthetics
aren't currently supported.
On Sep 30, 2011 3:28 AM, David Stanaway da...@stanaway.net wrote:
When did this get announced?
I have been bugging
32 matches
Mail list logo
