of the
Master or Media Server and also if the client cannot see it, you will
most likely need to add on the Master (Just to prove a point).
Simon
-Original Message-
From: Dave Markham [mailto:dave.mark...@fjserv.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 2:00 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: veritas
D
Just sent a reply on this but ...
Yes HOSTS is a FLATFILE and no extension is needed ! :-)
Shame there is no DNS, as the HOSTS file is a little legacy to say the
least! But its helped, and that is what matters!
You may as well disregard my replies !
Simon
-Original Message-
From:
...@ewilts.org]
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 6:48 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Pre / Post Scripts on Backup Jobs with Streams
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:41 AM, WEAVER, Simon (external)
simon.wea...@astrium.eads.net wrote
Plateau Wireless
575.389.4189 - office
575.309.6372 - cell
dust...@plateautel.com
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER,
Simon (external)
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 10:41 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Pre / Post Scripts on Backup Jobs with Streams
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:07 AM, WEAVER, Simon (external)
simon.wea...@astrium.eads.net wrote:
I have used ST before, not just for Oracle
I try and group policies based on factors like:
Exchange Backups
Oracle
SQL
Windows
Linux
Vault
If its a standard file level type backup, then I group them together,
using the ALL LOCAL DRIVES directive.
For some servers, like clusters, this is not done, and a policy would be
configured for
Also remember, that some policies have to be configured based on a
Policy Type. As mentioned, things like SQL, Exchange, SAP can only
contain those types of clients :-)
Simon
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Hi All
In a NBU 5.1 MP5 environment, I have client machines that require Oracle
to be taken down.
the client backup is in an existing policy with many other Windows
Systems.
The policy allows for streams.
Problem I am seeing: Although for this client, the Services STOP when
the job begins, the
what version of CC ??
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Dean
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 1:07 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Clear Case Backups
Not the same environment, but clearcase v7.x seems to run VERY happily
on NetBackup 5.1 under Win2k3 SP1 or higher!
Legacy old Systems, did result in the Services being taken down, as the
files could not be backed up!
IBM / Rational also do not make it very clear how they should get their
Is the NetBackup client service started on the Windows Client?
Simon
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of NBU
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 1:55 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
We are trying to reduce the amount of volume pools for our Oracle / SAP
/ Exchange systems as they seem to have one PER system!! And it has cost
alot of time and trouble in managing tapes.
Where possible, we try to reduce the volume pools down, and try to
keep the retentions the same.
I have
Review the logs or the job details in Activity Monitor.
You dont mention what sort of client it is.
Usually, it could be due to locked file in use, and NetBackup was unable
to gain exclusive access to this.
Could also be a .tmp file that was locked.
From:
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER,
Simon (external)
Sent: 7. april 2009 15:13
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] LTO4 Performance With Exchange 2003 IS Poor
Hi
Environment:
NBU 5.1 MP5 Master Plus many SAN SSO Media Servers Win2k3 SP2
, April 07, 2009 4:14 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO4 Performance With Exchange 2003 IS Poor
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:12 AM, WEAVER, Simon (external)
simon.wea...@astrium.eads.net wrote:
Environment:
NBU 5.1 MP5
:09 PM
To: Ed Wilts
Cc: WEAVER, Simon (external); veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu;
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO4 Performance With Exchange 2003 IS Poor
Very nice break down, Ed. This type of situation is where the need for disk
storage units becomes
To: rusty.ma...@sungard.com
Cc: Ed Wilts; WEAVER, Simon (external); veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu;
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO4 Performance With Exchange 2003 IS Poor
Hello,
I just want to mention that IBM LTO tape drives spin down the speed. IBM LTO3
Hi
Environment:
NBU 5.1 MP5 Master Plus many SAN SSO Media Servers Win2k3 SP2
Problem: Mail Backups of Information Store using LTO4 SL500 are taking 4
1/2 hours extra to backup compared to LTO3.
Has anyone got any exposure to Ex2k3 / LTO4 / NBU5.1 Online Exchange
Backups? Checking the Exadmin
To: WEAVER, Simon (external); VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Not all drives appear to be used
Not in my experience..It releases the holds immediately. Having said
that we have been having to do this kind of thing way to often. Methinks
6.5.3.1 is still broke when
Have you got an update to this? Did you increase the settings to 99 for
Max Jobs Per Client (or a number higher than 10)
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
mcw012765
Sent: Wednesday, March 25,
Just one question on this
Doesnt nbrbutil release the locks when the Server is rebooted?
Simon
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
mcw012765
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 10:52 AM
To:
Not sure if this has been mentioned, as I lost my emails, but what is
the Max Job Settings set for?
Got the Hosts on the left pane of the window, then expand your Master,
then double click the Master Server.
Under Global Attributes, what is the Maximum Jobs per client set for ?
-Original
Set to 99 as a test and re-try mate!
I cant find all the emails, but at a guess, are you getting jobst stuck
or queued and not moving? If so, increase the Max jobs Per Client
setting and retry the backups !
And report back your findings to us.
regards
Simon
-Original Message-
From:
successful.
But I have asked many, many times .. but unless they are doing a Disk based
SQL Job Backup, they dont want to know :(
From: rusty.ma...@sungard.com [mailto:rusty.ma...@sungard.com]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 4:24 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external
Check the event logs.
Make sure you have disk space available where NetBackup resides and also
where the Catalog is placed.
What happens with the manual kick off of a Backup job?
Reboot the Server?
Thanks, Simon
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Start with BLAT which you can download on the web (Do a search).
Some reading to start with ...
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/254809.htm
Simon
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On
Do you mean you would like to turn a Client into a SAN Media Server?
Or are you wanting this SAN Client access to the same robot and drives as your
master? In which case, you would need something called a Shared Storage
Option License key.
Simon
-Original Message-
From:
: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 5.1 and SQL Online Agent - Some
Situation: Win2k3 SP2 Master and Mutliple SAN Media Servers.
I have many VM Machines that are doing backups via the lan at this
stage. VMCB will be looked into later this year.
Problem I am seeing
Thanks Bill. May just take you up on that to be sure what I am doing is correct.
Warm Regards
Simon
From: Bill Roth [mailto:william.c.r...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 6:48 PM
To: rusty.ma...@sungard.com
Cc: WEAVER, Simon (external); VERITAS-BU
...@sungard.com [mailto:rusty.ma...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 4:02 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 5.1 and SQL Online Agent - Some Advice
andAssistance please ?
I think
during a quieter moment and
that has saved some time, which is good.
But will re-look again in the manual and do some testing.
Simon
-Original Message-
From: David McMullin [mailto:david.mcmul...@cbc-companies.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 6:49 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc
Found this...
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/301777.htm
Simon
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 11:32 AM
To: Sekhon Simrat S.
Cc:
From: Sekhon Simrat S. [mailto:sssek...@vasc.com]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 3:14 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; Ed Wilts
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Master Media on Windows 2008 SP1 x86
I did some testing with Master/Media 6.5.3
Exactly. Thought I would post for the originator :)
From: Ed Wilts [mailto:ewi...@ewilts.org]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 3:40 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: Sekhon Simrat S.; Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 Master
is prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please
notify the sender and delete this e-mail from your system.
WEAVER, Simon \(external\) simon.wea...@astrium.eads.net
Sent by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
03/23/2009 02:22 AM
To
bob...@attglobal.net, veritas-bu
Good Morning
I wonder if I can get some advice from some NBU SQL Experts here.
Situation: Win2k3 SP2 Master and Mutliple SAN Media Servers.
I have many VM Machines that are doing backups via the lan at this
stage. VMCB will be looked into later this year.
Problem I am seeing: In particular, 2
back !
Greetings
Simon
From: Peter Mosopa [mailto:peter.mos...@multichoice.co.za]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 6:25 AM
To: Steve Fogarty; WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Some Help Please - Status 89
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 6:40 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Some Help Please - Status 89 on Win2k3
Standard Server SSO San Media
What version of Solaris are you running? Pre Solaris 10, you will have
to set
.
Simon
From: rusty.ma...@sungard.com [mailto:rusty.ma...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 5:51 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Some Help Please
All
hope I can have some help here. Logged a call 2 days ago with Symantec,
due to the problem with this Server.
NBU 5.1 MP5 Master and 6 SSO SAN Media Servers
1 Particular Server had a problem Thursday night with backup issues. It
was reporting status codes of 41 and 89. Since then, the Full
All,
I don't belive that what I am doing is an unsupported configuration, but
I thought I would pose this question in case I am going to make myself
look stupid.
Environment
Win2k3 SP2 NBU 5.1 MP5 Master + 6 SAN Media SSO Using Single LTO3 Robot
Introduced new LTO4 Robot to the Master and its
bpexpdate -m MediaID -d 0
This assumes they are assigned against a Master Server.
if I was you, I would make sure you definetely dont need them :-)
but by running this command, it will do the job you want...
Simon
From:
Hi All,
Seem to be having problems, using the Device Configuration Wizard on NBU
5.1 MP5 on Win2k3 SP1 and SL500 LTO4 Drives.
Although its in the Fabric, Device Manager, and used the HP Drivers,
everything looks great, apart from the DCU Wizard, which is reporting
back the Drive Type for the
Of WEAVER,
Simon (external)
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 1:50 PM
To: Dean
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] SL500 - LTO4 Not Detected - Drive Type UNKNOWN
Hi All,
Seem to be having problems, using the Device Configuration Wizard on NBU
5.1 MP5 on Win2k3 SP1 and SL500
Would this be the one from the KB Site?
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/297103.htm
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 3:00 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: Dean; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
.
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 4:30 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: Dean; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] SL500 - LTO4 Not Detected - Drive Type UNKNOWN
Simon,
Device mappings
:-)
Will get back in touch with you sir
From: Dean [mailto:dean.de...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 10:13 AM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] SL500 Library - Cannot Be Seen By Master
]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 10:13 AM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] SL500 Library - Cannot Be Seen By Master
Simon,
Here's a way you can visually checking your zoning configuration from
Cisco Fabric Manager.
I don't have access
All
A general chit -chat question really. I discovered a project where it
holds 500mb Data and was NOT backed up !
The only reason this came to light was due to a problem on the Server,
when the NBU Admin realised it had not been backed up (but should have
been).
Looking at the history, it was
I would check Network Settings, NIC Drivers, any Software updates,
Duplex Speed, verify its not auto and set to the physical speed of the
Network.
Little things like this is worth a check.
Compare settings to another client if possible.
Went down a route a while back (on the list too I think
From: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com
[mailto:judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 4:09 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external); veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] SL500 Library - Cannot Be Seen By Master
FC tape
All
Wonder if I can get some advice. My original NBU CD's have gone astray
and I am trying to source the Red Hat 5 64-bit edition client software
for use on NetBackup 5.1.
Does anyone know how to obtain the software or download via Symantec ?
I cannot even be sure it was part of the NBU 5.1
Well including your introduction email with its PASSWORD in place is not
a good start !!!
start with a new message and send to
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
I would change your password !
Simon
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
I agree with Ed
I am the guy in the Jeans and T-Shirt.
1) Nowt wrong with frequency schedules for Fulls! Use them all the time
2) Keep the Policies and Volumes to a LESS as possible.
3) Over complexing the system makes NBU harder to administer than it
really, really needs to be !
Simon
Jason
Properties of the Client Attribute or the Sys Admin Guide perhaps?
There is a Technote on google out there on this..
If I find it, will direct it to you :-)
Simon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leidy,
Jason D
Sent:
Check what VSS / VSP settings are in use for this client?
Maybe turn it off as a test, restart the NetBackup Client Service and
retry the backup?
Simon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Preston,
Doug
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008
Just to add to my original reply...
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/243593.htm
HTH
Simon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
venkatesh111
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 11:07 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject:
Do you have a vm.conf file with SCRATCH_POOL = SCRATCH defined?
This should be in the C:\program files\Veritas\Volmgr folder
Simon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
venkatesh111
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 11:07 AM
To:
Tracker.exe may be running behind the scenes.
START / RUN and type MSCONFIG and press OK
click on the START UP TAB
Look for tracker - if its ticked, untick it and then reboot!
May help...
Simon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mark
, December 02, 2008 2:42 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] SAP Scheduled Job Fails with 6 and
thenneverre-runs
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 9:29 AM, WEAVER, Simon (external)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well a call was logged
Im still focused on 6.5.2 upgrade from 5.1 MP5.
Will wait a while to see if any problems or issues are reported before
looking at this update.
Cheers for this link Ed :-)
Si
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent:
There you go Judy preferance to Unix :-))
Windows is getting better now ... x64 is certainly stable... looking
forward to Win2008.
Si
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 3:20 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external); [EMAIL
Hmm I may have misread, but I thought the original post said they
were only having issues I took it that the issues had just started!
But if this is not the case, and its been going on from day 1, then
Justin is quite correct, and you would need to setup a Barcode Rule for
this!
Well a call was logged and they are helping..!
Si
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 3:47 PM
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] SAP Scheduled
Hi All
SAP Media Server Win2k3_NBU 5.1 Media + SSO with Master
Appear to have a problem with a Redo Log policy.
If it gets a failure (say 96, 6 or 150), the job fails to re-run the
same day, but does re-run on the next backup window.
Schedule is set to run every 2 hours and I have a window of
-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 2:34 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] SAP Scheduled Job Fails with 6 and then
neverre-runs
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, WEAVER, Simon (external) wrote:
Hi All
]
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 2:42 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] SAP Scheduled Job Fails with 6 and
thenneverre-runs
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, WEAVER, Simon (external) wrote:
Justin
Agreed, and logging has been enabled, but in most
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 3:00 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] SAP Scheduled Job Fails with 6 and
thenneverre-runs
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, WEAVER, Simon (external) wrote
Hi All,
SAP/Oracle backups - I have a questions about retentions on them, and if
longer than 3 weeks - 3 months are justified. If online / offline / redo
jobs are kept for 2 month retentions, does this sound like overkill?
I am not convinced that restoring from a 2 or 3 month backup would be
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/280133.htm
Any help?
Simon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
BlueChris69
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 11:56 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Error 200
Hi,
For 2
Happy to be proven wrong, is it worth creating a new policy for this, in
case there is something that has become corrupt within the existing
policy?
Its just an after thought really.
Sorry the doc wasnt much help
Simon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Sounds like some sort of inconsistency.
Not sure what your plan is to move to a new master - Are you using
bprecover to restore everything back to the new platform? Ideally, it's
be better to restore everything to the new hardware, using the same
OS/NetBackup revisions from the previous master.
All
Just curious, but this folder contains 5GB of logs going back from 2006
to present day.
In order to retrieve some space, can I remove anything from here,
without causing harm to NetBackup?
There appears to be some usernames present. Inside the folders are
another 2 folders called JOBS and
From: Reynolds, Susan Kathleen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 7:38 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external); Steve Fogarty; Hudson, Steve
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] How to find out who cancelled a Backup
So effectively - this
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/230047.htm
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/230047.htm
From: Dean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 11:31 AM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: veritas-bu
I have seen an odd problem ... we had a stream of jobs terminate with
status 150, at a time when no one was logged in and even using the
system!
But a restart of the Services corrected this.
In all my years of doing NetBackup, I have only seen it twice. I have
put it down to a possible blip /
All
Good afternoon. I wonder if I can seek clarification.
Environment: NBU 5.1+MP5 Windows 2003 - Master and Many SAN Media
Servers using SSO
Problem: 2 SAN Media Servers are part of a Windows Cluster that is being
dissolved.
The Physical Names are: SERV1 and SERV2 with Virtual Names of FILE1
implications
If you can let me know, great! :-)
Simon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 4:28 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external); veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Change in Media Server Names / IP's - Advice
Cheers for confirming my concerns over this Ed !
Si
From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 4:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: WEAVER, Simon (external); veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Change
Hi Steve
In that case, just configure a SQL Job to backup the files to disk, and
then do a file level backup to tape for the .bak / .trn file(s).
Simon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jenner,
Steven
Sent: Monday, November 03,
What OS is the Media Server? What version of NBU?
What did the logs show?
Simon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sumeeth
Singh (S)
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 11:08 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sumeeth
Singh (S)
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 11:29 AM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external); VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] error 13 file read failed
Win2003 , NBU5.1MP6
Logs show
Im of the view that the NetBackup Server is your recovery Server. Or
put it another way ... your life boat!
If your sinking and in trouble. you need a life boat to come to the
rescue...
If your VM Master is on a HOST that is destroyed, and you dont have any
HA then you could well be in
I spoke about this a while back with Symantec (3 weeks or so), and its
not fully supported by them yet.
In test, you can do what you like but as it stands, it is possible,
but Symantec cannot offer assistance at this stage.
Simon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, October 26, 2008 4:43 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] End Of Life - NetBackup 5.1
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:57 AM, WEAVER, Simon (external)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for this. I have a contract with Maintenance Support
Rarely clean the drives myself (LTO3) - Only if I start to get Media
Related errors or possible write errors on a specific drive.
I always understood that too much over cleaning was more harm than
good. 16TB of Data per clean well that blows one of my sites out :-)
Thats a days work of
Hi
I use C:\ Drive and Shadow Copy Components or System State for Windows
2000 boxes.
What problem are you experiencing? Is the backup running? Is there a job
or error generated when attempting to run ?
Simon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
(as it is off by default).
So Yuk is the correct terminology :-)
Simon
From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2008 4:27 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu
Henk
Well for those in a similar position to myself, the End Of Life for
Support on 5.1 is Dec 31st 08. Still unclear if Symantec are willing to
support a mixed upgrade scenario of 5.1 / 6.5
Sort of guess they may not
So MP3 better come out soon :-)
In all cases, the System State Component and the C: Drive will be
sufficient to recover the C: Drive of the OS in question :-)
Leaving off the System State for Windows 2000 boxes (and its known as
Shadow Copy in Windows 2003), will mean essential critical system files
cannot be recovered
Hi Boris
Win2k3 Master - 36 Media Servers Win2k3 and approx 300+ LAN based
clients, including VM machines.
Master is a HP Proliant Dual Core with 2GB RAM.
Certainly isnt chocked, and runs along fine. approx 55-60TB Data or so a
week.
The only issue I see is that the SSO sharing checks can
to confirm there would be partial support
Simon
From: JC Cheney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 8:59 AM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external); Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] End Of Life - NetBackup 5.1
NetBackup 5.1
pools.
Simon
-Original Message-
From: bob944 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 3:06 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Cc: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Reduce Volume Pools
First, if this is one of the class of I do not appear to have
All
Cant find the document on the web, but to confirm is the 5.1 End Of
Support (in other words no more support ever from Symantec) is
December 2008?
Just wondered that if you are trying to upgrade to 6.5 AFTER this
date, whether Symantec will still support the 5.1 environment?
Could
All
Quick question; I am attempting to reduce the amount of volume pools
that are in use for each policy we have.
I want to group them together, but one thing I noticed is that they
have different retentions.
I used to think that was a big no no, but could someone advise if
this is an
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] End Of Life - NetBackup 5.1
Simon,
Why not move to 6.0MP7?
Justin.
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, WEAVER, Simon (external) wrote:
All
Cant find the document on the web, but to confirm is the 5.1 End Of
Support
I do not appear to have a reply to any emails I have sent for the past 2
weeks :-(
Simon
This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or
privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
post anything on their site to clarify this.
Simon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 4:43 PM
To: Jeff Lightner; WEAVER, Simon (external);
Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] End Of Life
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] No of LTO Tapes used for backups
bpimagelist has a -media option that kicks out the tape used, so you
should be able to throw something together using the output of
bpimagelist -hoursago 24 -media -l (or -U if you
environment Mike, then do not change it :-)
Simon
From: Michael Graff Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 9:02 AM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: Jorge Fábregas; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] MS Exchange
401 - 500 of 958 matches
Mail list logo
