[Veritas-bu] Netbackup and robot change.

2010-05-12 Thread Johan Redelinghuys
Netbackup 6.5.4 on master server. Server connected to an I2K robot. Robot went down and was replaced with a new one. All the tapes were transferred over to the new robot. Drive and robot configuration deleted on Netbackup master server and rescan was done. Robot and drives were picked up. All

[Veritas-bu] Some odd Netbackup Questions.

2009-11-04 Thread Johan Redelinghuys
Hi Been working with Netbackup for a couple of years and you sort of get set in the way that you do things. There are curtain parameters that you always set the same, like Maximum jobs per client = 99. Allow media overwrite = I tick all of them ... So I wondered what and why you set

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.3 master tanked

2009-10-26 Thread Johan Redelinghuys
Hi You will need to know what was your offline catalog backup tape label before you start: 1. Make sure to call the server the same name as per the original server. 2. Get your robot and drives working on the new server. 3. Install netbackup and patch to 6.5.3. 4.

Re: [Veritas-bu] ask error 48

2009-06-17 Thread Johan Redelinghuys
Hi Check the spelling of your client name, in the policy, under Clients. JR -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of James Pattinson Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 1:06 PM To: Yoseph Leleputra Cc:

[Veritas-bu] FW: Multi Stream Backups

2008-11-28 Thread Johan Redelinghuys
Hi all Scenario: Netbackup version: Netbackup 6.5.1 Backups: Exchange Information Store and Exchange mailboxes. Backup Hardware: 1 x LTO4 drive. Storage Unit: 1 x drive with max streams per drive set to = 8. Information store policy: Limit jobs per policy = 4 Allow mutable data

Re: [Veritas-bu] Removing 6.5.2 and going back to 6.5.1

2008-08-06 Thread Johan Redelinghuys
Hi guys I think it is high time that the guys stop at the current version and sort out ALL issues before they continue on to the next version. We have not even sorted out all issues with the previous version and here we are already battling with the new one and the one thereafter. If they could

Re: [Veritas-bu] Shared memory issue with Solaris 10

2008-07-28 Thread Johan Redelinghuys
Hi This is what we usually do to find the best performance in an environment. It is good and well to say 64 buffers with a size of 262144 but this is not necessarily the best in another environment. For you environment, do the following. 1. Take a 2 to 3 GB file and back it up without any

Re: [Veritas-bu] Lets hear about your upgrade experience! 5.x - 6.5

2008-03-17 Thread Johan Redelinghuys
Hi Good thing you are holding off with the upgrade because of Data Domain. We did the upgrade and everthing worked ok except Data Domain backups. To make a long story short, the problem was on the Data Domain side and it all had to do with permissions - This is was fixed it for us, so let

Re: [Veritas-bu] Slow mailbox backups

2007-02-27 Thread Johan Redelinghuys
Hi Guys Thanks for all the responses. The client moved some databases off the system, which improved the exchange database backup. Went up from 1 MB/s to 3 MB/s. The mailboxes however remained at the same slow speed. What I think is the issue is here is that the server is running at full