Yes, it is... Have you worked with them before?
Cheers, John H John Heck GS Server Support - LLNL MailCode: L-086 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (925) 422-0386 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 2:08 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 21, Issue 37 Send Veritas-bu mailing list submissions to veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Veritas-bu digest..." Today's Topics: 1. "piece handles" in Oracle RMAN backups..what are they? (Chris_Millet) 2. Re: UNIX doesn't like windows "space" (Ed Wilts) 3. Re: UNIX doesn't like windows "space" (Stump, Bob A) 4. date calculator (Stump, Bob A) 5. Re: date calculator (Jeff Lightner) 6. Re: date calculator (Martin, Jonathan) 7. Re: date calculator (Ed Wilts) 8. Re: date calculator (Randy Samora) 9. Re: sniff...bpgp is gone from 6.5 (Preston, Douglas L) 10. Re: sniff...bpgp is gone from 6.5 (Preston, Douglas L) 11. Re: date calculator (Jeff Lightner) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:57:48 -0800 From: Chris_Millet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Veritas-bu] "piece handles" in Oracle RMAN backups..what are they? To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> While doing some full hotbackups via the Oracle db agent, we've noticed that the total size of the jobs ran through Netbackup vs the database size can be 50-70% more. Of those jobs, we see the actual data files as one part of the backup and something called "piece handles" (from the RMAN) log also being sent to Netbackup that amount for the size discrepency. -Chris +---------------------------------------------------------------------- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:58:03 -0600 From: "Ed Wilts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] UNIX doesn't like windows "space" To: "Stump, Bob A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: veritas-bu <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On Jan 22, 2008 2:23 PM, Stump, Bob A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How do I get past the "space" in a windows folder name when running > bplist from a UNIX master? > Like all other Unix shell commands that have spaces in them - escape it. Ditto if you have wildcards in your bplist. > For instance > > > # bplist -C daddywarbucks -t 13 -R 2 -nt_files -s 01/01/2007 -e > 01/22/2008 /C/Program Files/VERITAS/NetBackup > # bplist -C daddywarbucks -t 13 -R 2 -nt_files -s 01/01/2007 -e 01/22/2008 /C/Program\ Files/VERITAS/NetBackup .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20080122/1747d9b0/attachment-0001.html ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:07:24 -0600 From: "Stump, Bob A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] UNIX doesn't like windows "space" To: "veritas-bu" <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Thanks to all The backslash, single quote, double quotes all worked. ________________________________ From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 3:58 PM To: Stump, Bob A Cc: veritas-bu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] UNIX doesn't like windows "space" On Jan 22, 2008 2:23 PM, Stump, Bob A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How do I get past the "space" in a windows folder name when running bplist from a UNIX master? Like all other Unix shell commands that have spaces in them - escape it. Ditto if you have wildcards in your bplist. For instance # bplist -C daddywarbucks -t 13 -R 2 -nt_files -s 01/01/2007 -e 01/22/2008 /C/Program Files/VERITAS/NetBackup # bplist -C daddywarbucks -t 13 -R 2 -nt_files -s 01/01/2007 -e 01/22/2008 /C/Program\ Files/VERITAS/NetBackup .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ______________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _____________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20080122/efcc299e/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:16:22 -0600 From: "Stump, Bob A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Veritas-bu] date calculator To: "veritas-bu" <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Does anyone know how I can recalculate what a date would be if I added 558 days to it? For instance, what date would it be 558 days after July 7, 2008? ______________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _____________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20080122/3215d532/attachment-0001.html ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:27:50 -0500 From: "Jeff Lightner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] date calculator To: "Stump, Bob A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "veritas-bu" <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Excel does date math - just format as date. Input 07/07/08 in one cell (say B5) then in B6 put formula "=B5+588" So long as B6 is formatted as a date field it should show you the resulting date. Answer is February 15, 2010 by the way. ________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stump, Bob A Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 4:16 PM To: veritas-bu Subject: [Veritas-bu] date calculator Does anyone know how I can recalculate what a date would be if I added 558 days to it? For instance, what date would it be 558 days after July 7, 2008? ______________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _____________ ---------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you. ---------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20080122/fb8ad421/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:38:08 -0500 From: "Martin, Jonathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] date calculator To: "Stump, Bob A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "veritas-bu" <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Did you want something online / one time thing? http://www.timeanddate.com/date/dateadd.html Or were you looking for something scriptable? -Jonathan ________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stump, Bob A Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 4:16 PM To: veritas-bu Subject: [Veritas-bu] date calculator Does anyone know how I can recalculate what a date would be if I added 558 days to it? For instance, what date would it be 558 days after July 7, 2008? ______________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _____________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20080122/3bcefcd1/attachment.html ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:48:18 -0600 From: "Ed Wilts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] date calculator To: "Stump, Bob A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: veritas-bu <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On Jan 22, 2008 3:16 PM, Stump, Bob A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone know how I can recalculate what a date would be if I > added > 558 days to it? > > For instance, what date would it be 558 days after July 7, 2008? > In a Linux bash shell: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ewilts]$ date -d "7/7/2008 +558 days" Sat Jan 16 00:00:00 CST 2010 .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20080122/79ac6942/attachment.htm ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:48:47 -0600 From: "Randy Samora" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] date calculator To: "Stump, Bob A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "veritas-bu" <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >From date: Monday, July 7, 2008 Added 558 days Resulting date: Saturday, January 16, 2010 http://www.timeanddate.com/date/dateadd.html Thanks, Randy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stump, Bob A Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 3:16 PM To: veritas-bu Subject: [Veritas-bu] date calculator Does anyone know how I can recalculate what a date would be if I added 558 days to it? For instance, what date would it be 558 days after July 7, 2008? ______________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _____________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20080122/34456872/attachment.html ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:49:37 -0500 From: "Preston, Douglas L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] sniff...bpgp is gone from 6.5 To: "Curtis Preston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Kevin Whittaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Stump, Bob A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Nbgp.exe is not in windows 6.51 bpdir.exe still exists in windows 6.51 Doug Preston Systems Engineer Land America Tax and Flood Services Phone 626-339-5221 Ext 1104 Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------ NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission may constitute a communication that is legally privileged. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying it, and notify the sender by reply e-mail, so that our address record can be corrected. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------ -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis Preston Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:32 AM To: Kevin Whittaker; Stump, Bob A; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] sniff...bpgp is gone from 6.5 What about the new nbgp: # ls -l /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/*gp /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/nbgp The old syntax apparently doesn't work. What DOES work? (Let's not try this on a production system, shall we?) Also, is the new nbgp on Windows? --- W. Curtis Preston Backup Blog @ www.backupcentral.com VP Data Protection, GlassHouse Technologies -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Whittaker Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:17 AM To: Stump, Bob A; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] sniff...bpgp is gone from 6.5 nope... that is gone. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stump, Bob A Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 12:56 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] sniff...bpgp is gone from 6.5 Somebody please check to see if bpdir still exists in NB 6.5 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of cpreston Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 12:41 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] sniff...bpgp is gone from 6.5 I'm looking into whether or not this is true. If it is, it's time for an email campaign. Some see it as a security hole, and I think that's ridiculous. Anybody who is root/Administrator on a NetBackup master can push any file to any client any time they want via a backup/restore command. Removing bpgp only makes it take a few minutes instead of a few seconds. Other complaints about it over the years have been that it doesn't check for like/like. You can overwrite a directory with a file if you tell it to. For example, the following command would be VERY BAD! WRONGWAY# bpgp to client /etc/hosts /etc #DON'T DO THIS While this would be perfectly valid syntax with copy, cp, rcp, mv, etc, it is NOT proper syntax with bpgp. The command above would overwrite the /etc DIRECTORY with /etc/hosts, which, of course, would not be good for your client. (Some have even overwritten their root mount point.) Perhaps they got too many calls from people that did just that. Of course, about five lines of code could have fixed that problem. It doesn't allow you to copy a directory, but it doesn't check if what you're copying to is a directory. A simple check that the target file is or is not a directory would have sufficed. If it was a directory, it could just exit with error. But they chose instead to just pretend the command didn't exist. It's not documented; there's not even a Usage statement in the command itself, even if you do strings. If you call support and complain they tell you it's not supported. +---------------------------------------------------------------------- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ______________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _____________ _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:05:31 -0500 From: "Preston, Douglas L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] sniff...bpgp is gone from 6.5 To: "Preston, Douglas L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Curtis Preston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Kevin Whittaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Stump, Bob A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" My bad, that is left over from a previous version. Doug Preston Systems Engineer Land America Tax and Flood Services Phone 626-339-5221 Ext 1104 Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------ NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission may constitute a communication that is legally privileged. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying it, and notify the sender by reply e-mail, so that our address record can be corrected. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------ -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Preston, Douglas L Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1:50 PM To: Curtis Preston; Kevin Whittaker; Stump, Bob A; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] sniff...bpgp is gone from 6.5 Nbgp.exe is not in windows 6.51 bpdir.exe still exists in windows 6.51 Doug Preston Systems Engineer Land America Tax and Flood Services Phone 626-339-5221 Ext 1104 Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------ NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission may constitute a communication that is legally privileged. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying it, and notify the sender by reply e-mail, so that our address record can be corrected. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------ -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis Preston Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:32 AM To: Kevin Whittaker; Stump, Bob A; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] sniff...bpgp is gone from 6.5 What about the new nbgp: # ls -l /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/*gp /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/nbgp The old syntax apparently doesn't work. What DOES work? (Let's not try this on a production system, shall we?) Also, is the new nbgp on Windows? --- W. Curtis Preston Backup Blog @ www.backupcentral.com VP Data Protection, GlassHouse Technologies -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Whittaker Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:17 AM To: Stump, Bob A; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] sniff...bpgp is gone from 6.5 nope... that is gone. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stump, Bob A Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 12:56 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] sniff...bpgp is gone from 6.5 Somebody please check to see if bpdir still exists in NB 6.5 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of cpreston Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 12:41 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] sniff...bpgp is gone from 6.5 I'm looking into whether or not this is true. If it is, it's time for an email campaign. Some see it as a security hole, and I think that's ridiculous. Anybody who is root/Administrator on a NetBackup master can push any file to any client any time they want via a backup/restore command. Removing bpgp only makes it take a few minutes instead of a few seconds. Other complaints about it over the years have been that it doesn't check for like/like. You can overwrite a directory with a file if you tell it to. For example, the following command would be VERY BAD! WRONGWAY# bpgp to client /etc/hosts /etc #DON'T DO THIS While this would be perfectly valid syntax with copy, cp, rcp, mv, etc, it is NOT proper syntax with bpgp. The command above would overwrite the /etc DIRECTORY with /etc/hosts, which, of course, would not be good for your client. (Some have even overwritten their root mount point.) Perhaps they got too many calls from people that did just that. Of course, about five lines of code could have fixed that problem. It doesn't allow you to copy a directory, but it doesn't check if what you're copying to is a directory. A simple check that the target file is or is not a directory would have sufficed. If it was a directory, it could just exit with error. But they chose instead to just pretend the command didn't exist. It's not documented; there's not even a Usage statement in the command itself, even if you do strings. If you call support and complain they tell you it's not supported. +---------------------------------------------------------------------- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ______________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. _____________ _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:08:13 -0500 From: "Jeff Lightner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] date calculator To: "Ed Wilts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Stump, Bob A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: veritas-bu <veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Whoops - my apologies on earlier answer. It is Jan 16 2010 as Ed has it - I accidentally added "588" rather than "558" in my answer. ________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 4:48 PM To: Stump, Bob A Cc: veritas-bu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] date calculator On Jan 22, 2008 3:16 PM, Stump, Bob A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does anyone know how I can recalculate what a date would be if I added 558 days to it? For instance, what date would it be 558 days after July 7, 2008? In a Linux bash shell: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ewilts]$ date -d "7/7/2008 +558 days" Sat Jan 16 00:00:00 CST 2010 .../Ed -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you. ---------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20080122/95c000e5/attachment.htm ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu End of Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 21, Issue 37 ****************************************** _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
