Justin
If your data is fairly static you may find the built in deduplication of NBU to
be a benefit. Contact your Symantec system engineer for more information. The
time spent on this could save you money and administrative burdens.
Thanks,
Rockey
Please excuse short reply and spelling or
John,
If you are using special barcode sequence for the weekly backups then set up a
barcode rule (inventory, advanced); otherwise, what is the problem with letting
the tapes come from scratch and being put into the correct pool. They will be
assigned by pool name and retention.
Howdy,
If you're considering CV you may want to look into Backup Exec as well.
The key question missing for this forum to really help you is; what itch
is your management trying to scratch? Are they looking for cost breaks,
a more reliable tool, or a Windows centric application? Give us
Duncan,
You should set the LUN as a virtual node and create a policy to back up
the LUN. Remember, for a full to be in effect within NBU the full must
be ran as a scheduled job within the policy that contains the client.
So when the LUN moves to another client all backups will be full until
the
Rusty,
Make sure you virus scan is set to ignore .VSP file. VSP will be
required of W2K servers; whereas, VSS should be used on W2K3.
Thanks,
Rockey J. Reed
You're not obligated to win. You're obligated to keep trying to do the
best you can every day. Marian Wright Edelman
If you have multiple STU create an STUG
Thanks,
Rockey J. Reed
You're not obligated to win. You're obligated to keep trying to do the
best you can every day. Marian Wright Edelman
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
WALLEBROEK Bart
Sent:
NOM can be I/O intensive at times and VM doesn't virtualize VM too well.
YMMV!
Thanks,
Rockey J. Reed
You're not obligated to win. You're obligated to keep trying to do the
best you can every day. Marian Wright Edelman
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Dennis,
Was this with MSEO (Media Server Encryption Option) of client side
encryption?
Thanks,
Rockey J. Reed
You're not obligated to win. You're obligated to keep trying to do the
best you can every day. Marian Wright Edelman
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, but not in the same policy. Just create two policies, using
separate storage units that are associated with different media servers
on the different subnets. The two media server could be on the same
physical machine that is addressed by alias names (e.g. backup01,
backup02, both which
Kevin,
What data are you wanting to get reports on? This will help us to help
you! Also, what version of NetBackup are you currently using!
Thanks,
Rockey J. Reed
You're not obligated to win. You're obligated to keep trying to do the
best you can every day. Marian Wright Edelman
Scott,
The 2003 server should be protecting the shadow copy components not the
system state which is for Windows 2000. As for the other performance my
first suggestion is to check the NIC setting. If GigE then auto
negotiate is acceptable; however, if 100Mbps Ethernet is used force the
NIC
John,
Have you done some configuration in the include/exclude that is causing
this overriding feature?
Thanks,
Rockey J. Reed
You're not obligated to win. You're obligated to keep trying to do the
best you can every day. Marian Wright Edelman
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Get you last good catalog backup and do a restore, then make sure you
don't fiddle with the Authorization section of the NBU without first
reading and making sure you truly understand what the is going on. It
appears you have successfully restricted everyone from the
administrative feature. In
Curtis,
You won't be proven wrong unless someone does some serious voodoo and
all the planets and starts align exactly right. Even so the process
would not be repeatable. Not to get real technical, but the reason is
the way the file systems are written, NTFS verse any other FS equals no
Simon,
As the old man, bob944, is saying the results your coworker is seeing is
expected. A client and media server, by default, cannot restore data
except to themselves (clients) or the machines they backup (media
servers). Only the Master server can restore to all machines;
therefore, the
If you edit the registry, make sure the master is the 1st server in
list!
Thanks,
Rockey J. Reed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Preston,
Douglas L
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 3:31 PM
To: Broun, Bevan; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Check the client for a mapped drive; if mapped there is a good chance
the 'other-than-Month-End' policy has an exclude. I have seen this when
a USB drive was attached, shared, and then removed without unmounting.
If this is the case, delete drive U:\ from the system.
Thanks,
Rockey
Title: Message
Simon is correct. The software is on
the Windows CD and the binary is automatically installed. The license key,
when added to the Master server, will unlock the function and the Exchange
policy can be configured.
Thanks,
Rockey J. Reed
From:
[EMAIL
Dont
forget, you may be able to use the inclusion list and have fewer keystrokes.
Of course this depends on how your directory structure is laid out. HTH
Thanks,
Rockey J. Reed
Lead Solutions Specialist
Consulting Services
Symantec Corporation
www.symantec.com
Asiye,
The numbers reported are what are reported to NetBackup from the
library. We track the amount of data written to the tape; however,
depending on the compressibility of the data determines the amount of
data that can be placed on any individual piece of media. For example a
large text
The 134 error can be reduced if not eliminated by ensuring the shared
memory of the NBU server is set properly. Also, you may notice 134 when
there is no storage unit readily available, meaning in use by another
backup/restore job when the backup starts; however, this should go away
when the
21 matches
Mail list logo
