Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: One Client Per Policy

2008-01-22 Thread WEAVER, Simon (external)
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis Preston Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 8:30 PM To: Dominik Pietrzykowski; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: One Client Per Policy Also, have you haven't mentioned the issues with Nbpem

Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: One Client Per Policy

2008-01-22 Thread Jeff Lightner
To: Curtis Preston; Dominik Pietrzykowski; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: One Client Per Policy Curtis I am sure you are right, and pretty certain in most places this would work, but maybe not for everyone (me included). Does not mean I disagree, its just my own view

Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: One Client Per Policy

2008-01-22 Thread WEAVER, Simon (external)
: RE: [Veritas-bu] FW: One Client Per Policy Doing things in 6.x based on how they worked in 3.4 reminds me of this little story: Scientists put 5 monkeys in a cage. In the center of the cage they suspended bananas out of reach of the monkeys. They also

Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: One Client Per Policy

2008-01-22 Thread Curtis Preston
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] FW: One Client Per Policy Curtis I am sure you are right, and pretty certain in most places this would work, but maybe not for everyone (me included). Does not mean I disagree, its just my own view from the use of NBU 3.4 onwards Simon

Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: One Client Per Policy

2008-01-22 Thread Martin, Jonathan
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: One Client Per Policy Doing things in 6.x based on how they worked in 3.4 reminds me of this little story: Scientists put 5 monkeys in a cage. In the center of the cage they suspended bananas out of reach of the monkeys. They also put a stool

Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: One Client Per Policy

2008-01-22 Thread Jeff Lightner
Pietrzykowski; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: One Client Per Policy I know it's a big pill to swallow, and very different than what most people are used to. Therefore, not all clients I recommend it to swallow it. ;) FWIW, I will say that every client that HAS

Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: One Client Per Policy

2008-01-22 Thread Curtis Preston
, Simon (external); Dominik Pietrzykowski; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] FW: One Client Per Policy Blue pill - if you an experience a backup lasting more than 4 hours consult your technician... From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

Re: [Veritas-bu] FW: One Client Per Policy

2008-01-21 Thread Curtis Preston
Also, have you haven't mentioned the issues with Nbpem when you have so many policies. It takes ages to run through policies and start kicking off jobs ie about 1hr for 500+ policies and 1500 clients. With 6000 policies I would hate to see how long it takes, do you ever bounce netbackup on that

[Veritas-bu] FW: One Client Per Policy

2008-01-20 Thread Dominik Pietrzykowski
Curtis, I think there are horses for courses and I think I should share my opinion so that readers can hear both sides. I have a few hundred windows servers in my windows server filesystem backup and the same for UNIX. There's also one for DBs (1 for UNIX and 1 for WIN) and another couple for

[Veritas-bu] FW: One Client Per Policy

2008-01-20 Thread Dominik Pietrzykowski
Also, have you haven't mentioned the issues with Nbpem when you have so many policies. It takes ages to run through policies and start kicking off jobs ie about 1hr for 500+ policies and 1500 clients. With 6000 policies I would hate to see how long it takes, do you ever bounce netbackup on that