Hi,
I did a bit of searching, and found a link to a post on the Symantec blog -
access denied but still in google cache.
Hard to be sure why its no longer accessible, but it mentions some of what
isn't supported until NBU 7.5. Maybe ask your rep for clarification about
the items mentioned.
Robyn
Anyone else being pressured to upgrade to 7.1.0.3 to support vSphere5 or
Exchange 2010 SP2? I tried looking through the release notes, but I can't
find exactly what 7.1.0.3 won't support. I'm pretty sure I read somewhere
it was clustered datastores and the new filesystem. Is there a restriction
functionality
is (if any?) I could be mistaken.
-J
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of . .
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 12:16 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 7.1.0.3
Anyone
If you are in a CPU dense, memory lean environment, the vSphere
Enterprise for 6 core CPUs is a good reason. Similar for SRM.
I'm awaiting 7.1.0.3 to get fully baked to test/deploy myself.
On 12/20/2011 11:16 AM, . . wrote:
Anyone else being pressured to upgrade to 7.1.0.3 to support vSphere5
