: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Quan
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 7:40 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Shared memory issue with Solaris 10
Sure,
NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS 64
SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS 262144
/Steve
---
On Thu, 24 Jul
Steve,
Can you share what is the Number / Size of data buffers set in your environment.
+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in system tuning);
IPC tuning is now done by using solaris 10 projects (/etc/projects
file).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NBU
Sent: 23 July 2008 13:40
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Shared memory issue
Sure,
NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS 64
SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS 262144
/Steve
---
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, NBU wrote:
Steve,
Can you share what is the Number / Size of data buffers set in your
environment.
+--
|This was sent by
Hi forum,
I have a Master and 3 media server on solaris 9 having Netbackup 6.0 MP4.
Recently added new media server with solaris 10. Problem which i am facing is
when the load increases (Schedule starts) backup start failing with error code
89.
Experts need your help on this.
thanks
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, NBU wrote:
Hi forum,
I have a Master and 3 media server on solaris 9 having Netbackup 6.0 MP4.
Recently added new media server with solaris 10. Problem which i am facing is
when the load increases (Schedule starts) backup start failing with error
code 89.
I'd be interested in this too, as i'd heard you didnt need to bother
with /etc/system tuning in Solaris 10.
Cheers
Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, NBU wrote:
Hi forum,
I have a Master and 3 media server on solaris 9 having Netbackup 6.0 MP4.
Recently added new media server
Normally you shouldn't but some of the shared momory settings are
still working and can only be tuned by /etc/system
Dave Markham a écrit :
I'd be interested in this too, as i'd heard you didnt need to bother
with /etc/system tuning in Solaris 10.
Cheers
Justin Piszcz wrote:
On
There is your problem right there.
$ cat NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS
32
$ cat SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS
262144
For LTO-2 and LTO-3 you should be using the SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS as shown
above, for the number of DATA_BUFFERS, anything above 32 is usually
overkill/makes no differnece in performance.
Justin.
On
PROTECTED]
To: NBU [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 9:11:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Shared memory issue with Solaris 10
There is your problem right there.
$ cat NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS
32
$ cat SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS
262144
For LTO-2 and LTO-3 you
] On Behalf Of Jon
Bousselot
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 11:04 AM
To: Justin Piszcz; NBU
Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Shared memory issue with Solaris 10
I'll concur with Justin. 262144 SIZE is a good performer, and 32 NUMBER
is a sweet spot for LTO-4. If you have
From: Justin Piszcz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: NBU [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 9:11:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Shared memory issue with Solaris 10
There is your problem right there.
$ cat NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS
32
$ cat
We have Solaris10 master media servers here without any changes to
/etc/system but I'm also interested in what others are doing.
/Steve
---
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Dave Markham wrote:
I'd be interested in this too, as i'd heard you didnt need to bother
with /etc/system tuning in Solaris 10.
Sorry,
I didn't informed that i am having LTO3 drives. Other media server with Solaris
9 is having same settings which is giving a better output.
+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject
Re: [Veritas-bu] Shared memory issue with Solaris 10
We have Solaris10 master media servers here without any changes to
/etc/system but I'm also interested in what others are doing.
/Steve
---
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Dave Markham wrote
15 matches
Mail list logo
