Not exactly - I get "timeout connectiing to SAN Client Service" or words
to that affect.
Setting to Manual stops this :-)
Simon
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jim H
Sent: Thursday, August
I would rather set to Manual, because if a Service is disabled, it can
still report an event in the event logs.
And still cause questions for IT Admins
Simon
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On
Thank you John
Simon
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of John
Hink
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:14 PM
To: Ed Wilts; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBak
Does NBU have the capability to use multiple media types in the same
drive based on policy?
My example is a Sun T1 drive. There are two different types of tape
available. A standard tape that holds 1TB/2TB compressed & the Sport
version which holds about 250gb/500gb. Depending on the data bein
Thanks for everyone's response on DPM. I agree it looks like a great tool for
backing up remote offices, and possibly even other Microsoft specific
applications like SQL, SharePoint, and Exchange. My real problem though, is
that we are talking about using it for our entire data center, or at
You can use bar-code rules to put different types of tapes into different
Volume Pools based on their labels, but you only get a single "scratch" pool.
If you want to use Scratch pools, you have to do it based on media type/density
settings.
However, to use the two different tape technologies
Ich werde ab 07.08.2009 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
09.08.2009.
Ich werde Ihre Nachrichten nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/verit
Looking for info on comparisons between tape robot technology. We've
been using a Sun/Storagetek L700 for about seven years. It's been
running spectacularly. We're getting ready to add a second robot and
we're looking at a Sun/Storagetek SL3000 with eight LTO4 drives. My CIO
asked me if I had l
I looked into this a bit more, that error isn't exactly what you should see,
like Mr. Hilton said it should just be "starting" and "stopping". I played
around with trying to get a similar error but I was not able to. What version
of windows are you running?
John Hink
Staff Tech Support Enginee
We did a similar exercise a few years ago to consider a successor to the
L700. I looked in detail at a number of libraries available at the time,
and we chose what was then the ADIC Scalar i2000 - now Quantum. We had
collated reqirements and scored them before asking for information from
ven
The iscaler 2000(?) is supposed to be a competitive product and IBM also
has some libraries as well. (I was in a similar situation). Went
SL500(s) due to their expandibility. The price diff between SL8500 and
SL3000 is not a lot if you are building big systems.
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Steve Jenk
Hi
Does Any one having any Idea how tapes usages will increase after enable the
client side encryption ???
Right now I am using Client side Encryption and when i enable that thing my
Tape usages increase drastically so i am not confirm how many percentage will
increase after enable the encryp
Steve,
We have several libries, including an SL3000, a few SL8500s and i2000s,
among others.
The SL3000 and i2000 have been rock solid. The SL3000 offers an additional
longbot for redundancy, which is nice if you can afford it. The i2000 does
not have this option.
Either way, I think you'll be
Hello,
Unless you also enable client compression when you enable the client side
encryption, you lose the tape compression. How much you lose depends on how
much compression you had.
len
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@ma
Hi
I never used compression for tapes
+--
|This was sent by apatoli...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--
___
We have L700's and SL3000's here onsite.
My experience with the SL3000:
- Has a MAP issue where when my robot is rebooted, unless the fibre is pulled
out of the robotic controller, the MAP will never come online. If the robot is
allowed to boot fully, then the fibre is put back in, the MAP f
Hi.
I am running Netbackup 6.5.3 on Solaris, and I occasionally see that the
Catalog Backup hangs and then when Vault kicks off it's catalog backup,
it just gets queued.
The queue reason is limit reached for maxjobs.
Canceling the original hung catalog backup does nothing...the Vault
catal
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 03:35:14PM -0400, apatoliya wrote:
> I never used compression for tapes
You disabled it explicitly? It's on by default at the hardware level.
Encrypted data is the same size as non-encrypted data. But after
encryption the data is incompressible.
--
Darren
Thanks for reply
But why every time when i was enable encryption the tape usage increased that i
know with encryption throughput will degrade somewhat.
Is there something i am missing to configure ???
even i open a call with symantec they doesn't having information regarding
this issue.
+---
I have this problem with 2 different capacity IBM 3592 media types. I
couldn't work out any way to get NetBackup to use 2 different media types on
one drive.
Luckily I have enough tape drives that I was able to set some drives to
HCART, and some to HCART2. It means I lose a certain amount of flexi
When you use NBU client side encryption it removes any repeatable
patterns that the tape drive hardware compression works off. So there is
nothing to compress and so you end up using more tape space.
The only way to get around this issue is to also run with client side
compression since NBU will co
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Daniel Otto wrote:
> When you use NBU client side encryption it removes any repeatable
> patterns that the tape drive hardware compression works off. So there is
> nothing to compress and so you end up using more tape space.
> The only way to get around this issue
Make all you're drives HCART, and all your tapes HCART, then they become
interchangeable. Of course you'll then have to find some other method of
tracking witch tapes are of what type, such as volume pools and bar-code labels.
Dean wrote:
> I have this problem with 2 different capacity IBM 35
I've got the same problem with my catalog backup occasionally hanging with
6.5.3 running o Solaris. I worked around it by until no jobs are running and
then doing an "nbrbutil -resetall". You may then have to use robtest to
manually un-load and tapes left in drives.
This typically happens be
I have the same problem with Hot catalog backups hanging with 6.5.3 on Solaris
10. It's supposedly fixed in 6.5.4; I'll know by the end of next week if it
truly is.
I work around it by waiting until all backups are done, and killing the hung
jobs, then doing an "nbrbutil -resetall". After tha
I love the L700's, but after doing a lot of research last year I found that
Storage-Tek was falling behind the technologies. The front runners for me was
SpectraLogic, and Quantum/ADIC. We ended up with an Quantum i2000 with 10
LTO4's and 200 slots with plenty of room for future expansion by
26 matches
Mail list logo
