Any news yet or links at all?
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/333092.htm
Soon me hopes!
Regards
Simon
This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential
and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected
from disclosure. If you are not the intended
It's on the FTP site. It doesn't look quite complete yet (The LiveUpdate
UNIX packages have 1of3 and 2of3 but not 3of3) but it's getting there.
ncftp ...ckup_Enterprise_Server pwd
ftp://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_Enterprise_Server/
-rw-r--r-- 1 30024 30024
Ok thanks Ed. Will hold off. it may be that I am a little too early, as
its almost time for me to finish today.
Keen to get it deployed in test ASAP so I can go into production before
Christmas
Simon
From: Ed Wilts [mailto:ewi...@ewilts.org]
Sent: Wednesday,
http://www.symantec.com/business/support/downloads.jsp?pid=15143
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon
(external)
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 9:40 AM
To: Ed Wilts
Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Stephen
The search is there, the download does not appear to be :)
But I can wait
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Huddle,
Stephen R
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 2:43 PM
To:
NB_6.5.5.winnt.x64_337791.exe
That one exists for sure. Just updated out test box.
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon
(external)
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 9:46 AM
To: Huddle, Stephen R;
confirmed. its now online here too.
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Huddle,
Stephen R
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 2:50 PM
To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re:
hmmm the update is quite large once it gets installed !
Is there any harm if the old Update pack is uninstalled (to free up
space) before applying the new one?
Simon
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Well - dunno why. Certainly doesn't work that way for me.
vmoprcmd -d ds | grep Yes
26 hcart3 TLD Yes 007766 007766 Yes Yes
0
30 hcart3 TLD Yes 007357 007357 Yes Yes
0
39 hcart3 TLD Yes 007195 007195 Yes Yes
0
Still - to answer your question, and take the slot number thing into
account.
for tape in `vmquery -a -l | awk '$8!=- $9!=0 $12~/OFFSITE/
{print $1}'`
do
eject $tape
done
The awk selects robotic tapes (field 8), not slot 0 (field 9), volume
pool contains OFFSITE (field 12) and
Attached is a perl script that will list the tapes in each drive of a
robot as long as it is run on the robotic control host.
Patrick Whelan
NetBackup Specialist
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Greetings,
It looks like when the tapes were first loaded in, the proper barcode rule
for that library was not in place. The LT tapes did what I wanted but the
ARF ones did not. Bob reminded me that I could delete the tapes now that I
had the rule in place. I deleted the tapes and ran it
Boy if I had a nickel...
-Jonathan
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jeff
Cleverley
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 4:21 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Barcode label oddity.
Maybe TLH library thing?
Here is a tape in a drive:
sudo ./vmquery -m s06571
media ID: S06571
media type:1/2 cartridge tape 2 (14)
barcode: S06571
media description: Robot
14 matches
Mail list logo
