Are you sure about that:
> ... not be able to stream data to a disk array
If data from NBU policy goes as one stream and you direct them to particular
arrays
disks (each policy to different disks) it is sequential (not random !) IO
pattern. In such case even SATA disks
are able to cope with it a
Hi Kevin
I do not want to be a downer on Clustering, as I quite like MS
Clustering, but the reason why I would be looking at Clustering the
Master is due to "High Availability" of that application.
However, please bear in mind that if you have 1000+ jobs running while
the Master Cluster fails ove
I agree with Martin here on them "working" in some cases. I have and
EMC Clariion with 45 1TB SATA disks and I can tell you it screams. I
routienly see over 600MB/S out of the array wjile destaging. Sure, I
have a larger and potentially "smarter" array than some but to say
they don't ever work
Hi all,
I'm Suhas,
I'm getting the following error when my disk to tape backup is in progress only
for 1 storage
Error bptm(pid=5620) write error on media id NE3026, drive index 0, writing
header block, 55
But when i re- initiate the backup the same media will be picked on which it
had
Hi,
It may have used a different drive, show tpclean -L output and check the
job details, did it use the same job? Are other tapes being frozen on
that drive or just that one?
Justin.
On Thu, 6 May 2010, shetty wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm Suhas,
>
> I'm getting the following error when my dis
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Spellacy, Sean wrote:
> I was hoping to use flashbackup to be able to pull them but I read in the
> documentation that flashbackup is not supported on clusters.
>
>From the 6.5.6 release notes:
(ET2003460) Support for FlashBackup in a Microsoft Cluster (MSCS)
env
Hi,
Weaver, Simon, i dont understand, you tell me to create one media server
specifically for this client is it? I think itÂ’s a good idea, I have a free HBA
in this P595, and create a media server on the same host as my client and link
the HBA with my SAN network to the VTL, I think its work,
I think to make an informed decision you would need to look at the
bigger picture. Your original goal was to increase your backup
performance and shrink you backup window
Disk can be great but don't expect your backup times to increase just
because you are using it.
Is your disk being provided fr
Luciano
My name is Simon Weaver (1st name Simon!)
You dont have to do what I tell you :-) It was only a suggestion!
I have quite a few SAN Media Servers, with SSO - connected to the same
library over Fabric.
I only suggested it for 2 reasons
1) It backs up itself
2) Faster over fabric than the L
BCV may not exist for the storage you have. That however, does not
preclude changing the storage. Not cheap but you really can't get
around some time limits without doing it.
As noted most people running extremely large databases use a
Mirror/Split (BCV/SRDF etc...) methodology to sync the m
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 12:00:09PM -0500, Nate Sanders wrote:
> Thanks for the info on the spec. I was under some impression that
> Netbackup (remember, we're on 5.1 here) had an issue with using three
> different media types. Maybe this is not the case but it was something I
> had in my head. If t
11 matches
Mail list logo
