[Veritas-bu] Allow Multiple Data Streams creating thousands of jobs!

2010-06-25 Thread Brandon35
I have a policy with Allow Multiple Data Streams enabled. It's backup selection is about 15 directories (SAN attached). e.g. C:\dir1\* C:\dir2\* C:\dir3\* C:\dir4\* .. I have "Limit jobs per policy" set to 6, so I figured NBU would only allow 6 at a time. But it tries to create thousands (a job

[Veritas-bu] Allow Multiple Data Streams creating thousands of jobs!

2010-06-25 Thread Brandon35
Oh okay I got it. So if I limit jobs to 6, it'll still queue all 15 directories in my backup selection, but will only allow 6 to run at once, correct? +-- |This was sent by brandon.pawoll@mda.mil via Backup Central. |Forwar

[Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-07 Thread Brandon35
Hi everyone, In one of my environments we replaced our old SAN switch with a new Cisco. We went from 1 fabric on the old switch to 2 fabrics on the new Cisco switch. We split up the tape drives 1, 2, 3, 4 on Fabric A. 5,6,7,8,9 on Fabric B. After this switch, our media servers are having enorm

[Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread Brandon35
Martin, Jonathan: I tried http://support.microsoft.com/kb/315539 to view possible hidden tape drives due to path change. They did not appear. pharrold: While that is a very useful command in situations where it's needed, wouldnt deleting all the drives and rescanning for them via Netbackup's C

[Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread Brandon35
Im having tape drives show up with the same BUS address... Drive 1 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 1, LUN 0 Drive 2 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 2, LUN 0 Drive 3 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 3, LUN 0 Drive 4 Location: Bus Number 0, Target ID 4, LUN 0 Drive 5 Location: Bus Number 0, Ta

[Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread Brandon35
Drive 1 through 5 is on Switch A Drive 6 through 9 is on Switch B So that could be why the Location addresses are duplicating. Would that cause a problem though? +-- |This was sent by brandon.pawoll@mda.mil via Backup Centr

[Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread Brandon35
I meant duplicate Targed ID, not bus. Sorry +-- |This was sent by brandon.pawoll@mda.mil via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +--

[Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread Brandon35
I tried this on my solaris box, all I get is * ** SDT_TAPE * * and nothing... Is there anyway to get this same information on a windows box? What if i'm getting -1, -1, -1 ?? +

[Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread Brandon35
Thanks for the info Judy, Netbackup actually does not report any -1,-1,-1 I had only seen this in one of the Windows tape drive driver installers. One of my windows machines that is only seeing 5 of the 9 drives showed the first 5 drives with normal bus, location, id numbers. but the last 4 dr

[Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-08 Thread Brandon35
A Darren Dunham, My environment looks like this: Master1 Solaris Media1 Linux Media2 Windows Media3 Windows Media4 Windows Media5 Windows Running tape -scan on each shows: Master1 : 0, but the netbackup gui finds 7... Media1: 9, gui finds 9 as well Media2: 9, gui says unable to retreive device

[Veritas-bu] SAN Switch Change caused NBU7 to lose tape drives

2010-07-13 Thread Brandon35
Yeah, that was my question. I have made some progression. I unzoned the drives, dropped them from every media server, rebooted, and slowly reconfigured -everything- I currently have 6 of 9 drives spinning. 1 is blinking amber, so something wrong with it. But my two new drives we recently got a

[Veritas-bu] Staging off Virtual Tape Library

2010-07-13 Thread Brandon35
The person before me had configured a large backup policy (4TB) to have Multiple Copies. 1 copy goes to our virtual tape library (VTL) with a 2-week retention and the 2nd copy goes to our physical tape library with a 2-month retention. Obviously the VTL is there in case of a huge disaster we ca

[Veritas-bu] Staging off Virtual Tape Library

2010-07-13 Thread Brandon35
We can fit in the window fine. Our infrastructure, while terrible, isn't that bad haha. What I'm trying to do is save backup time. So instead of this policy soaking up a two drives (one on the VTL, and the other on the physical tape library) I want the policy to backup ONLY to the VTL during t

[Veritas-bu] Staging off Virtual Tape Library

2010-07-13 Thread Brandon35
It looks like the answer is something I have not touched yet... Storage Lifecycle Policies Someone please assure I have the right understanding here: I have created a Storage Lifecycle Policy named "slp-fileserver" I have modified the "Full" schedule, that runs over the weekend, to override i

[Veritas-bu] Staging off Virtual Tape Library

2010-07-13 Thread Brandon35
haha Dean, I posted my post 4 seconds after you :) But thank you sir for confirming my finding seems to be correct. Possibly you could answer my question on scheduling the duplication portion to occur in the daytime? +-- |This

[Veritas-bu] Staging off Virtual Tape Library

2010-07-13 Thread Brandon35
Fantastic! Thanks, Dean! Since I only want to do this for my weekend full backup I will have this command run in a script scheduled on Friday: nbstlutil inactive -lifecycle slp-fileserver this will prevent duplication from running, but not the backup, which is perfect. And then, monday mornin

[Veritas-bu] Staging off Virtual Tape Library

2010-07-14 Thread Brandon35
Just finishing the scripts now. Showtime will be this weekend of course, I'll post on how it did Monday afternoon, since I want duplication to occur starting Monday morning probably around 6am. Also just FYI, I am using NBU7.0 with Window master server. The file server that will backup the dis

[Veritas-bu] postgres, sybase?

2010-07-14 Thread Brandon35
I recently was questioned on the postgres user account that Netbackup installs. Netbackup has a postgres service running and I also know the Netbackup uses Sybase. After doing a search on 1,200 pages of Netbackup documentation PDF files I have, I found the term "postgres" twice, both only refe

[Veritas-bu] Nbu 7.0

2010-07-14 Thread Brandon35
I am not, but I am running NBU7 on several other OSs, do you have a question? +-- |This was sent by brandon.pawoll@mda.mil via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +---

[Veritas-bu] Nbu 7.0

2010-07-14 Thread Brandon35
Very good points. I wonder if we can get the CentOS crew to make CentNetbackup, now we'd be saving some money!! :) +-- |This was sent by brandon.pawoll@mda.mil via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-

[Veritas-bu] Nbu 7.0

2010-07-14 Thread Brandon35
I was absolutely being facetious, ;) +-- |This was sent by brandon.pawoll@mda.mil via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- ___

[Veritas-bu] Staging off Virtual Tape Library

2010-07-14 Thread Brandon35
I was giving the storage lifecycle policies a test run this morning, and though the KB article says the duplication process will begin minutes after the backup runs, ... the duplication isnt running at all! I've waiting 30 mins now, and nothing has happened. I am researching into this right now

[Veritas-bu] Staging off Virtual Tape Library

2010-07-14 Thread Brandon35
You are amazing, it worked like a charm and did exactly what I wanted it to do :) Thank you all so much! +-- |This was sent by brandon.pawoll@mda.mil via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +---

[Veritas-bu] Staging off Virtual Tape Library

2010-07-14 Thread Brandon35
We do have Vaulting license. It is however not set up at all, and I have never touched it yet. (Im still new). What I do know about Vaulting is that it will take the last Full backup images and copy them (probably with an extended retention) to a set of unused tapes and optionally eject them f

[Veritas-bu] Staging off Virtual Tape Library

2010-07-14 Thread Brandon35
Ah got it. What's the point of Vault then? This all seems very easy to setup with base Netbackup :) +-- |This was sent by brandon.pawoll@mda.mil via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +---

[Veritas-bu] Staging off Virtual Tape Library

2010-07-14 Thread Brandon35
I guess it's the programmer in me (my background). But yes, I am very happy with my SLP setup currently and cannot wait to see it all work this weekend. Thank you all for your help. I will post here with my results for the interested :) +

[Veritas-bu] report backup status elapsed time

2010-07-15 Thread Brandon35
Okay, here's a confusing one... I used Reports > Client Backups and ran a separate report for the last 9 weekends. (We run full backups on weekends starting Friday night). My results are surprising and I cannot quantify why it looks this way... Week   Data(TB)   Elapsed Hours W1      14.543 

[Veritas-bu] report backup status elapsed time

2010-07-16 Thread Brandon35
Is the reported elapsed time including the time that job spent in queue? If so that would explain this, as now I have nearly 1,000 jobs queuing at night that could explain the jump in total "elapsed time" yet decreased backup times. +-

[Veritas-bu] report backup status elapsed time

2010-07-16 Thread Brandon35
Thanks for the info. I see "Active Elapsed" as a selectable column in my Activity Monitor, but unfortunately, I can't get that column in my Reports for historical info... I'm thinking command line may be able to pull this info for me. I am researching, will post my findings :) +---

[Veritas-bu] Staging off Virtual Tape Library

2010-07-19 Thread Brandon35
Just for the interested: The SLP setup worked perfectly. No duplication of this SLP was attempted until my script to reactivate the SLP this morning at 6am. I have effectively cut off 12+ hours of backup time on our weekend schedule. Thanks for everyone's help. +---

[Veritas-bu] report backup status elapsed time

2010-07-19 Thread Brandon35
This weekend 95% of my backups finished by Saturday-noon... incredible backup time savings (they used to run until monday morning)... yet im reporting ~500 hours of elapsed time. A few months ago without all these optimizations backup times were running until monday morning and reporting ~300

[Veritas-bu] Storage life cycle policy question.

2010-07-19 Thread Brandon35
I just accomplished something similar. If you want to follow along what I did here is the forum: http://www.backupcentral.com/phpBB2/two-way-mirrors-of-external-mailing-lists-3/symantec-netbackup-18/staging-off-virtual-tape-library-106811/ basically my solution was to run a script before the we

[Veritas-bu] Drive scan host is not active

2010-07-26 Thread Brandon35
Hi, During duplication during the day I am getting "Drive scan host is not active " as State Details, for the queued jobs. It's no big issue, but shouldn't it say "Drives are in use" instead ? Because as soon as a job finishes, one of the queued jobs with the "Drive scan host is not active "

[Veritas-bu] Reintroduce Expired Image

2010-08-03 Thread Brandon35
Here's the situation, I have a user who needed a file restored. As I checked to pull up the file I have found that image that has his file expired only 4 days ago. Is it possible to A) Find out what image/tape it could possible be on and B) Reintroduce or at least retreive data from it? +-

[Veritas-bu] Reintroduce Expired Image

2010-08-03 Thread Brandon35
Any tips on finding "by hand" ? Everything I've tried so far will only report to me active images. +-- |This was sent by brandon.pawoll@mda.mil via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +--

[Veritas-bu] Reintroduce Expired Image

2010-08-04 Thread Brandon35
I was able to load the catalog from last week into a test machine to find the tape. And it has already been overwritten. Tough luck for my guy. Thanks for the help everyone! +-- |This was sent by brandon.pawoll@mda.mil via B