On Mar 2, 2010, at 10:26, Shekel Tal wrote:
> It takes roughly 73 clock cycles on a Windows or Linux server or about
> 87 clock cycles on UNIX server to perform MSEO compression/encryption
> per BYTE of data backed up. Backing up 100 MB/sec of data through a
> Solaris media server requires 8.7 GHz
NetWorker has a feature where you can put a ".nsr" file in a
directory, and then during backup it's contents will be parse so that
you can treat particular files or directories in a special way. An
example from the man page:
> Having a /usr/src/.nsr file containing:
> +skip: errs *.o
>
On Apr 6, 2010, at 21:21, David Magda wrote:
> NetWorker has a feature where you can put a ".nsr" file in a
> directory, and then during backup it's contents will be parse so
> that you can treat particular files or directories in a special way
Thanks to Jeff an
On May 19, 2010, at 02:39, WEAVER, Simon (external) wrote:
> Thanks for this. Yes, this is one method, but what about a backup
> solution - ie: now 20 years out of date, no media, no server to
> restore
> to and in a format unknown to todays backup systems.
>
> What would you do then? :-)
> the
On Fri, June 4, 2010 08:03, Asiye Yigit wrote:
> do you have any experience about netbackup media servers on Sun
> Coolthread servers?
>
> I am wondering how netbackup perform well on Coolthread servers?
>
> Which one do you recommend between Mx000 and CoolThread servers?
All of our recent NetBac
On Jun 9, 2010, at 19:27, A Darren Dunham wrote:
> NFS cannot carry the NTFS ACLS though. So conceivably you can do all
> CIFS backups and get all security structures. (I do NDMP and have
> mainly UNIX servers, so it's not something I've tried to test).
Well, NFSv4 does NTFS-style ACLs. See Sec
Isn't Greenplum's database based on PostgresSQL?
If so, while not officially supported by NBU, whatever you can find
online with regards to that you can probably leverage: post- and pre-
scripts as mentioned, but also using WAL files to achieve PITR if you
don't want to do straight dumps.
O
On Thu, October 7, 2010 08:21, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
[...]
> Also with "permanent" storage on disk as opposed to tape you
> always take the risk that the remote storage might die and kill all your
> backups. Tapes can degrade but you are far less likely to lose all
> your offsite tapes at one fel
On Fri, April 15, 2011 11:13, Dennis Peacock wrote:
> Just wondering if anyone here has any tips as to how to get the
> information out of the SLConsole software without having to actually login
> to the GUI. I'd like to be able to do command line scripting to get the
> info I need out of it.
>
> A
On Thu, April 21, 2011 13:18, Asiye Yigit wrote:
> Hello;
>
> Yes. After some research, I found the link aggregation on new HWs on
> solaris.
>
> So, I think we use link aggregation.
>
> Do you know any issue with netbackup while using link aggregation?
You may want to make sure that the load spre
On May 17, 2011, at 07:38, scott.geo...@parker.com wrote:
>> Is there one?
>
> If you can handle the nuisance, IT Toolbox has a fairly busy Solaris
> group. My ISP cut off direct access to newsgroups, but I think that
> comp.unix.solaris still gets some activity. Darren Dunham used to be a
Hey,
Anyone know if Linux (specifically RHEL 5.x) supports multi-pathing to
tapes? Is it worth setting up a media server with a 10 GigE interface and
two (or more) FC connections on the other?
AFAICT, the "device-mapper-multipath" only support MPIO for block devices.
Is this assessment correct?
On Wed, July 27, 2011 17:03, Len Boyle wrote:
> David,
>
> I think the answer depends on what you mean by multi-pathing, and the
> maker of the tape drive.
>
> The new IBM tape drives include two ports. But I think that it is only for
> failover. And I suspect that the support would only be in the
Thanks. I'll guess we'll look at other options.
On Jul 27, 2011, at 17:49, Alexander Leikin wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> There is no multi-pathing for Tape Drives,
>
> Regards,
> Alex
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mai
On Jul 27, 2011, at 17:36, Stier, Matthew wrote:
> Creating zones or vlans is easily done on any modern managed switch (FC
> or Ethernet).
>
> A concern I have, is the IO bus of the system you are using. Even the
> PCI-e bus has bandwidth limits, and depending how the system is
> designed, even a
On Aug 3, 2011, at 03:44, WALLEBROEK Bart wrote:
> In the end IBM, Quantum and Spectra were the only vendors left that were any
> good (HP and SUN fell of quite fast)
> We choose for Spectra (although it was the more expensive one) for the reason
> that their robots are far more technologically
On Jan 10, 2012, at 17:53, Andrew Stueve wrote:
> On Fri, January 6, 2012 10:31, Rosie Cleary wrote:
>
>> I ran a test recently and found that Netbackup transfers data from the
>> backup client to the server in clear text. I would prefer to secure the
>> network traffic without encrypting the r
17 matches
Mail list logo
