On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:08:08 -0700
Venkata Sreenivasa Rao Nagineni venkatasreenivasarao_nagin...@symantec.com
wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
In the first mail you mentioned that you are using mpxio to control the XP24K
array. Why are you using mpxio here?
I guess this part of his email said that
2010 20:48
To: Ashish Yajnik
Cc: sebastien.daubi...@atosorigin.com; undisclosed-recipients:,
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; Veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] Solaris-SFS / MPxIO / VxVM failover issue
This is absolutely false!
MPxIO is an excellent multipathing solution
: sebastien.daubi...@atosorigin.com; undisclosed-recipients:,
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; Veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] Solaris-SFS / MPxIO / VxVM failover issue
This is absolutely false!
MPxIO is an excellent multipathing solution and is supported by all
major storage
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Sebastien DAUBIGNE
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 9:32 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients
Cc: Veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] Solaris-SFS / MPxIO / VxVM failover issue
Hi,
I come back with my dmp_fast_recovery issue (VxDMP fails
2010
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] Solaris-SFS / MPxIO / VxVM failover issue
Hi Sebastien,
In the first mail you mentioned that you are using mpxio to control the XP24K
array. Why are you using mpxio here?
Thanks,
Venkata Sreenivasarao Nagineni,
Symantec
-Original Message-
From: veritas-vx
Veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: Wed Oct 06 10:08:08 2010
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] Solaris-SFS / MPxIO / VxVM failover issue
Hi Sebastien,
In the first mail you mentioned that you are using mpxio to control the XP24K
array. Why are you using mpxio here?
Thanks,
Venkata Sreenivasarao
:,
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; Veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] Solaris-SFS / MPxIO / VxVM failover issue
This is absolutely false!
MPxIO is an excellent multipathing solution and is supported by all major
storage vendors including HP. This issue discussed in this thread has to do
with improper
5.0_REV-5.0MP3A25_sol Qui)
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien DAUBIGNE [mailto:sebastien.daubi...@atosorigin.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 8:41 AM
To: Veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] Solaris-SFS / MPxIO / VxVM failover issue
Thank you Victor
Which version of veritas? Version 4/2MP2 and version 5.x introduced a
feature called DMP fast recovery. It was probably supposed to be
called DMP fast fail but recovery sounds better. It is supposed to
fail suspect paths more aggressively to speed up failover. But when
you only have one vxvm DMP
Sebastien,
I found the following in my notes:
Ø See http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/288497.htm and
http://support.veritas.com/docs/276602
Ø If MPxIO is enabled on a host, the Veritas DMP tunable “dmp_fast_recovery”
must be set to off, after SF is installed.
vxdmpadm gettune
Thank you Victor and William, it seems to be a very good lead.
Unfortunately, this tunable seems not to be supported in the VxVM
version installed on my system :
vxdmpadm gettune dmp_fast_recovery
VxVM vxdmpadm ERROR V-5-1-12015 Incorrect tunable
vxdmpadm gettune [tunable name]
Note -
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-vx-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Sebastien
DAUBIGNE
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 7:41 AM
To: Veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] Solaris-SFS / MPxIO / VxVM failover issue
Thank you Victor and William, it seems
12 matches
Mail list logo
