Dear All,
It is probably a beginners question... Sorry for that.
On several volumes vxprint shows:
v volumename DISABLED ACTIVE
pl volumename-01 DISABLED IOFAIL
pl volumename-02 DISABLED IOFAIL
After the reboot all the disks show as online in "vxdisk -o alldgs list".
# vxdisk -o alldgs list
Darren,
Thank you for your answer.
On 11/12/07, A Darren Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 08:08:36PM -0500, Aleksandr Nepomnyashchiy wrote:
> > On several volumes vxprint shows:
> >
> > v volumename DISABLED ACTIVE
> > pl volu
Darren,
Thanks a lot for your help.
On 11/13/07, A Darren Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:04:12AM -0500, Aleksandr Nepomnyashchiy wrote:
> > > > SENA1_6 sliceddatadg_new1 datadg online
> > > > SENA1_7 sliced
Dear All,
Please help me to make sense from the output below :
c2t48d0s2 (group: name=mtpqadg id=1165265631.1092.mtpqadb1 ) shows as exported
c2t58d0s2 (group: name=mtpqadg id=1165265631.1092.mtpqadb1 ) shows as exported
c2t32d0s2 (group: name=mtpqadg id=1165265631.1092.mtpqadb1 ) shows as impo
Dear All,
Could you please help me to understand output from vxdisk command.
There is something strange with c2t48d0s2 and c2t58d0s2 - they show as
exported (although group id is the same as the imported disks).
Thank you,
Aleksandr
Setup:
2 x Sol 8 servers sharing FC attached A5200 array, VxVM 3
Dear Gurus,
My disk group appdg consists of 2 disks and 6 volumes (each of the
volumes has 2 plexes - one on each of the disks).
I would like to :
A) detach one of the disk from appdg (leaving the data intact)
B) reattach the disk to the different disk group (thus moving the
volumes from one group
Dear Guru's,
Couple of questions about the striped-mirror volume below:
1. Why the volume size ( 20971520 ) doesn't match the size of any of
the plexes ( 20974356 and 20977888 ) ?
2. Why the sizes of 2 plexes don't match ( 20974356 and 20977888 ) ?
3. Why the sizes of subdisks are different betwe
Dear Volume Manager Gurus,
I though that creating the Veritas Volume in memory is possible, but I
couldn't find the way to do it.
Did I see Volume in memory in my dream or this is possible in real life?
Thank you,
Aleksandr
___
Veritas-vx maillist - V
Is there a chance that the volumes haven't been started on the destination node?
on server bda1k run:
vxdg list
vxprint -g DG1
Aleksandr
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Liang, Warren
wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I have a disk group DG1 on server bda1k. Which is a Solaris 10 U5 server.
> Boot disk is di
I don't see why it wouldn't be supported... Why do you need more than
one DG in resource group ??
On 5/23/09, Asiye Yigit wrote:
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> What do you think about having more than one disk gorup in a resource
> group.
>
> I think it is supported?
>
> Is it?
>
>
--
Sent from my mobile
Dear All,
I wanted to clone the server by mirroring the root disk and changing
the group id with vxprivutil (Solaris 8, SF5 MP3). Looks like I have
used "vxprivutil" incorrectly...
2 Questions:
A) Not sure if I should reboot reboot this server or my best bet is to
go back to the original group ID.
Dear VxVM Gurus,
Thanks in advance to everyone who find time to respond.
My system:
Solaris 8, Sun E3500, VxVM 3, / is ufs, encapsulated, mirrored.
My problem:
df shows 6G available in /, attempt to copy 30M file errors out with
"not enough space left on device". We had a power loss over the
week
Darren,
Thanks a lot. You are always very helpful.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:37 PM, A Darren Dunham wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 01:15:52AM -0400, Aleksandr Nepomnyashchiy wrote:
>> Dear VxVM Gurus,
>> Thanks in advance to everyone who find time to respond.
>>
>> M
Darren,
Thanks again for your comments. I have maintenance scheduled for
tonight to implement you suggestions.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 1:14 PM, A Darren Dunham wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 01:13:34AM -0400, Aleksandr Nepomnyashchiy wrote:
>> >> df shows 6G available in /, atte
Dear All,
This question is slightly off topic, apologies for this.
Could you please share your experience from using Veritas Clustered FS.
Background information:
We are using RedHat GFS ( RHEL 5.2, FC storage (Sun 6140) shared
between 4 servers) and getting complaints about performance. Do you
t
uburn.edu wrote: -
>
> To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> From: Aleksandr Nepomnyashchiy
> Sent by: veritas-vx-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Date: 08/07/2009 08:39PM
> Subject: [Veritas-vx] Veritas Clustered FS experience (RedHat GFS vs. VCFS)
>
> Dear All,
> Th
Dear List,
Apologies for the dummy question: what is the difference between SFCFS
vs. SFCFS HA ?
Looks like I can't have SFCFS without VCS (see QUOTE 1)? VCS provides
HA so, do I get even more HA :) when buying SFCFS HA ?
QUOTE 1 : from Veritas Storage Foundation™ Cluster File System
Administra
hen hardware
> or software fails, are not required for the operation of SFCFS, but can be
> added
> to the cluster after installing and configuring SFCFS HA./
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Regards,
> Amit
>
>
> Aleksandr Nepomnyashchiy wrote:
>>
>> Dear List,
>&g
Collin,
Do you have ASL ( Array Support Library) installed?
Aleksandr
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Brian Wilson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Collin wrote:
>
>> I've got the following
>>
>> Solaris 10
>> VxVM 5.0MP3RP1HF12
>>
>> I have a number of mount points that a
Dear List,
I am new to VVR ( has configured it once before without any issues,
but past performance doesn't guarantee the future results :) )
First steps have been completed, but I can't do the initial sync. Any
ideas are appreciated.
I have done so far:
1. setup a volume group with data volume
network settings.
>
> Bill
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Aleksandr Nepomnyashchiy
> wrote:
>>
>> Dear List,
>>
>> I am new to VVR ( has configured it once before without any issues,
>> but past performance doesn't guarantee the future results :) )
n come up with the easier way to fix this :)
Aleksandr
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Aleksandr Nepomnyashchiy
wrote:
> William,
> Thank you for response.
>
> RH EL 5.5, VxVM 5.1 SP1
>
>
> Please see vxprint output below. At the moment my guess is that
> /etc/hosts
Dear List,
I am running Veritas Storage Foundation 5.1 SP1 on Red Hat Linux using
the when 60-day evaluation liense while Procurement is getting me the
permanent one. Getting worried as days go by.
= from the installation log
* Enter a valid license key matching the functi
23 matches
Mail list logo
