From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
> Kaiser
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 11:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] Usage of snapshot and checkpoint.
>
> Three other points --
>
> 1. Ch
another.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Kaiser
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 11:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] Usage of snapshot and checkpoint.
Three other points --
1
don't), and some backup strategies need (NBU's FlashBackup comes to
mind).
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:33 AM
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:14:02PM +0530, Amit Chaurasia wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> I am a bit confused over Storage Checkpoint and Snapshot. Which one
> should one use over other ? In what scenarios are does checkpoint scores
> over snapshot and vice versa. Any leads to any document or reference is
>