Re: Merge

2011-01-04 Thread Rolf Schmolling M.A.
Hi, just to chime in: personally I donot need merge, currently just working on my dissertation from a local repository. But that need could occur in the futureā€¦ I've had the occasional looks at Cornerstone but could find my way around more easily in Versions. I prefer the diff via TextWrangler

Re: Merge

2011-01-04 Thread Jorde Vorstenbosch
Looking at how many people work at sofa I think they're actually up to something, something with their current software. They're most likely not telling us due to 'apple-like' tactics where they don't want to tell us XYZ and then not deliver Z. I personally don't need merge and don't use kaleido

Re: Merge

2011-01-04 Thread Charles Fahey
I share everyone's interest in this feature. Unfortunately, if you look at Sofa's other product Kaleidoscope, it is also nicely designed, and also suffers from a surreptitiously missing feature: the ability to merge differences. That's right, it's a diff tool that only displays differences. Sofa

Re: Merge

2011-01-04 Thread ct-scan
It would be nice to get a response from Sofa as to wether or not Merge is even in the works... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to versi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send emai

Re: Merge

2011-01-04 Thread ct-scan
I'm glad the link to Cornerstone was posted, I've been using Versions since the beta, and am getting frustrated that this obvious feature still isn't integrated. Maybe instead of additional UI enhancements (like the ones that just came out), adding this much requested feature would be better. I'd