Re: Merge feature

2009-07-01 Thread Gommit
I have 3 mac users switching from PC in the office and using Versions, they are all crying for merge. So I guess that makes +3 On May 7, 4:15 pm, jcdesrochers jcdesroch...@gmail.com wrote: Just a quick question about Versions development road map do you plan in a near future to add merge

Re: Merge feature

2009-06-29 Thread ericrdb
Yep, +1 here too. I introduced SVN to our shop in the last month. With our staff still grasping concepts, keeping all the interaction within one UI will encourage us all to become Versions evangelists, not to mention depend all the more on your tool instead of searching for alternatives.

Re: Merge feature

2009-06-14 Thread Robin Charlton
+1 for me. Having recently moved from Perforce to SVN I'm a little surprised how poorly supported merging is (in general). In the past we'd create branches for any non-trivial development task and integrate back into the trunk only after acceptance testing. Whilst Perforce's clients are certainly

Re: Merge feature

2009-06-03 Thread bids.bax...@googlemail.com
Another +1 from me. We're a cross-platform shop so I tend to use TortoiseSVN on Windows to do merges, but a fast, integrated merge window would make Versions much nicer to use. On May 7, 5:15 pm, jcdesrochers jcdesroch...@gmail.com wrote: Just a quick question about Versions development road

Re: Merge feature

2009-06-03 Thread Quinn Taylor
Conflict resolution is a separate issue and feature from merge support — conflicts can occur even without branches or tags, and even with a single developer, so long as there are conflicting edits in multiple working copies. Out of curiosity, do other clients offer conflict resolution? In

Re: Merge feature

2009-06-01 Thread Marchenko Igor
+1 here. On May 7, 7:15 pm, jcdesrochers jcdesroch...@gmail.com wrote: Just a quick question about Versions development road map do you plan in a near future to add merge support??? If so... any ETA?? I'm evaluating the svn clients for mac and the merge functionality is a must for us.

Re: Merge feature

2009-06-01 Thread iVira
+1. Version such a great svn client in all other cases. But lack of conflicts resolving... I have to avoid revert my changes, update and add them again. It's such a headache On May 7, 7:15 pm, jcdesrochers jcdesroch...@gmail.com wrote: Just a quick question about Versions development road

Re: Merge feature

2009-06-01 Thread Ray
I've never used a tool other than command line svn and a text editor to handle merges because all of my merging has been pretty simple. However, I would probably become more adventurous with what I used merging for if I had a good tool to help me with it. To make this thread more helpful to the

Re: Merge feature

2009-05-30 Thread derekr
Isn't it merging when you hold alt and drag the dir/file into the dir you want to merge with. On May 29, 9:30 am, denisa de...@riverocktech.com wrote: Ditto on the +1 for a Merge feature. On May 28, 11:57 pm, drzax elvery@gmail.com wrote: Yet another +1. Please. I was so excited

Re: Merge feature

2009-05-29 Thread drzax
Yet another +1. Please. I was so excited about Versions until I discovered this was missing. svn switch too. On May 26, 4:32 am, rwgrier rwgr...@gmail.com wrote: +1 here. I currently have to fire up another SVN tool (which isn't as nice) to do merges. Please add merging. On May 7, 12:15 pm,

Re: Merge feature

2009-05-29 Thread denisa
Ditto on the +1 for a Merge feature. On May 28, 11:57 pm, drzax elvery@gmail.com wrote: Yet another +1. Please. I was so excited about Versions until I discovered this was missing. svn switch too. On May 26, 4:32 am, rwgrier rwgr...@gmail.com wrote: +1 here. I currently have to fire

Re: Merge feature

2009-05-26 Thread rwgrier
+1 here. I currently have to fire up another SVN tool (which isn't as nice) to do merges. Please add merging. On May 7, 12:15 pm, jcdesrochers jcdesroch...@gmail.com wrote: Just a quick question about Versions development road map do you plan in a near future to add merge support??? If