Ziyad Saeed wrote:
I'm voting for github. It's free for opensource just like gitorious but
has nice web interface and an issue tracker as well.
Let's go for github then as nobody else has raised any strong objections.
I'll do future work in github and drop the svn repository. I'll send an
github also provides a downloads page for compiled binaries.
On Feb 4, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Jeremy Sanders wrote:
Ziyad Saeed wrote:
I'm voting for github. It's free for opensource just like gitorious but
has nice web interface and an issue tracker as well.
Let's go for github then as
Hmm - I've just made veusz repositories on github and gitorious.
github seems a bit more functional and seems initially to have a nicer
web interface. gitorious is supposed to be more free. Any opinions on
either? I expect it would be easy to switch if necessary:
http://gitorious.org/veusz
Benjamin K. Stuhl wrote:
Here are a few incremental patches (apply on top of the previous series)
to fix the two issues you've found plus one more cosmetic fix to zooming I
spotted while working on the antialiasing issue.
I think the design looks nice and the patch is clean. I can apply the
I second move to github.
___
Veusz-discuss mailing list
Veusz-discuss@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/veusz-discuss
