Re: [vfio-users] OVMF secureboot question.

On 08/11/17 17:05, Hagbard Celine wrote: > 2017-08-11 13:28 GMT+01:00, Laszlo Ersek : >> On 08/11/17 12:50, Hagbard Celine wrote: >>> Hi, I used to update at every new version form kraxel.org, but at one >>> point I had to stop updating due to secure-boot changes. As far as I

[vfio-users] passthrough of intel wifi device

Hello, I'm trying to passthrough intel wifi device. - Host linux : kernel 4.9.23 - intel nuc kaylake - pci wifi : 3a:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Intel Corporation Device [8086:24fd] (rev 78) - libvirt device : Guest VM : Fedora 25 / kernel 4.8.13

Re: [vfio-users] OVMF secureboot question.

On 08/11/17 12:50, Hagbard Celine wrote: > Hi, I used to update at every new version form kraxel.org, but at one > point I had to stop updating due to secure-boot changes. As far as I > could see, Q35 was needed for secure-boot on newer versions due to > i440FX not emulating SMM. > > Today I did

[vfio-users] OVMF secureboot question.

Hi, I used to update at every new version form kraxel.org, but at one point I had to stop updating due to secure-boot changes. As far as I could see, Q35 was needed for secure-boot on newer versions due to i440FX not emulating SMM. Today I did a search to see if anything had changed on the i440FX

Re: [vfio-users] OVMF secureboot question.

2017-08-11 16:57 GMT+01:00, Laszlo Ersek : > On 08/11/17 17:05, Hagbard Celine wrote: >> 2017-08-11 13:28 GMT+01:00, Laszlo Ersek : --shortening a bit >>> Some time after the implementation of SMM in all of KVM, QEMU (q35 >>> only), and OVMF, all of the OVMF

Re: [vfio-users] OVMF secureboot question.

2017-08-11 13:28 GMT+01:00, Laszlo Ersek : > On 08/11/17 12:50, Hagbard Celine wrote: >> Hi, I used to update at every new version form kraxel.org, but at one >> point I had to stop updating due to secure-boot changes. As far as I >> could see, Q35 was needed for secure-boot on