I think the problem with videos more than 10 minutes is that alot of
people, especially videobloggers who simply talk, get bored after awhile.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Kevin Lim brainop...@gmail.com wrote:
I could try if you like. I still have Director status when Youtube
first
I have an old director's account and I tried uploading a 30 min video
yesterday. It started to get converted and even had a url for a few
minutes but was then rejected for TOS violation and deleted.
- Verdi
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Matthew Milam mmila...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Matthew Milam mmila...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the problem with videos more than 10 minutes is that alot of
people, especially videobloggers who simply talk, get bored after awhile.
Back in the day,Youtube instituted the 10 minute policy for several reasons.
10min limit on Youtube, while unlimited time on the now defunked
Google Video. Explains why there were even entire foreign movies
posted on Google Video.
Isn't it interesting how high capacity system would naturally be
used to share commercial material? Even Justin.tv as a live streaming
service
The attention span of viewers on-line is very short and the videos should be
short.
a
--- On Fri, 1/23/09, Jay dedman jay.ded...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jay dedman jay.ded...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] More than 10 minutes
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, January
- Original Message -
From: Adriana Kaegi
The attention span of viewers on-line is very short and the videos should
be short.
a
Abusrd .. that line or reasoning says that no one would watch full length
movies on-line (Netflix for one) or full length TV episodes (Hulu and so on)
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Adriana Kaegi a_ka...@yahoo.com wrote:
The attention span of viewers on-line is very short and the videos should be
short.
Yeah, this is a good rule of thumb, but not an absolute rule.
Many folks just don't know how to tell a good story, so keeping it
short
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Jacek Artymiak
jacekartym...@gmail.com wrote:
Split it into two parts and end their names with , part 1 and ,
part 2. YouTube player will play one after another automatically if
you put them on the same playlist
Hmmm...didnt know this.
This is good
November!
Now I'm excited.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert rup...@... wrote:
I'm putting together a project that will hopefully allow people to
take a share proportional to their investment.
Basically just a limited partnership profit-share model.
Robert Croma sent me a
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman jay.ded...@... wrote:
someone is a good storyteller, I want the videos to be longer.
So people's attention span isnt short.
People's ability to sit through crap is short.
Jay
with, as of today, 51 fifteen minute chapters on the market, if i
hours long and thrilling . . .
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Brook Hinton bhin...@...
wrote:
The attention span of viewers on-line is very short and the videos
should
be short. ,
The whole point of not having to answer to corporate sponsors and
its-only-about-money gatekeepers
11 matches
Mail list logo
