Re: [videoblogging] who sends the most emails to this group?

Josh Leo wrote: > looking at the google-groups backup group...i thought it woul dbe fun to see > who, out of all of us, is sending the most emails to everyone... > > -1st place with 42 posts in the past 30 days - Pete Prodoehl > -in a close 2nd with 41 - Enric > -in 3rd, with 31

[videoblogging] Re: Compression techniques - file size ratios

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "wazman_au" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think there's little point in holding out against QT7 and H.264. > If people are prompted to install it to watch a vid, most people > WILL install it. And it's out for both Mac and Windows. What about poor playbac

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Does size matter?

Markus Sandy wrote: > lol - my wife has far more free space on her iPod than I do on my > Powerbook's 100GB drive! I'm struggling right now because I've got just a few gigs for podcasts and videoblogs that get downloaded on a nightly basis... I've got a 120 gig drive waiting to be dropped into

Re: [videoblogging] Tivo to Computer

Kearney, Pat wrote: > Hey everyone, how do u get "Tivo'd" shows off tivo and into your computer for > editing? You might be able to low-tech it and use a USB Video (analog) capture device... if a direct transfer of the digital file does not work. Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for

Re: [videoblogging] Re: watching personal videos

havilahland33 wrote: > TV sucks. I've heard it nicknamed as 'time vaporizer'. Go vid blogs! Is it fair to use such a blanket statement? There is plenty of good stuff on television, most of it is not on the major networks. (Though Arrested Development nearly made me laugh my *ass* off last nigh

Re: [videoblogging] Re: YouTube - WTF?

Joshua Kinberg wrote: > On 11/8/05, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Joshua Kinberg wrote: >> >>>The thing that I really don't understand about thee sites receiving >>>funding is that the barrier to entry for competition is so slim. It

Re: [videoblogging] Re: YouTube - WTF?

Joshua Kinberg wrote: > > The thing that I really don't understand about thee sites receiving > funding is that the barrier to entry for competition is so slim. It > wouldn't be too difficult for a developer to replicate YouTube or > Revver in a matter of a week or two. But you couldn't replicate

Re: [videoblogging] watching personal videos

petertheman wrote: > I was in the laundrymat, and I had just filled up my video ipod with a > bunch of movies (plug: the beta mefeedia makes it real easy), so I was > watching a video of the party at Jakob's place in nyc a while back at > vloggercon... but what I wanted to say was: it was a strange

Re: [videoblogging] YouTube - WTF?

Verdi wrote: > YouTube Receives $3.5M in Funding From Sequoia Capital > http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=100442 > Can someone who uses this service explain what they like about it? > Do you not care about these points that I bring up? Why not use > another free alterna

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Look at some of the comments I get

Roger wrote: > Personally, I think text commenting on videoblogs can be a very > strange thing, to begin with. I think most of us vlog because we > understand the limitations of trying to communicate with text Nope, I videoblog because I understand the strength of video... Each medium has it st

Re: [videoblogging] Re: legal questions

Gena wrote: > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >>You might what to determine what would constitute 'fair use' of > things. >>I was under the impression if you were referencing something in > yo

[videoblogging] Comparing The Flickrs of Video

The term "the Flickr of video gets used again, this time with reviews, and comments: http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/06/the-flickrs-of-video/ Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future... Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Fair play?

Re: [videoblogging] Re: looks like microslush is going to be mucking with rss

> > Because RSS is built on top of XML, any RSS feed is presumably > ALREADY "well-formed" XML. Oh man... sorry... finally stopped laughing long enough to post this. I'm going to go work on the lyrics to my 'Funky RSS' theme song now. Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future..

Re: [videoblogging] Re: legal questions

Gena wrote: > Well, this is fairly cut and dry to me. You need permission from the > original owners. You might not have a hard time if you contact the PR > or promotions department of the film. Some movie producers are > actively looking for bloggers to spread the word about their movie. > > The

Re: [videoblogging] Directory of Directories

andrew michael baron wrote: > I am working on a directory of directories that I linked from the > Rocketboom About Page and have put up a first skinny draft: > http://www.rocketboom.com/extra/video_links/ > > Please let me know of any missing links, I would really appreciate it > (and so would

Re: [videoblogging] Re: tuaw

Enric wrote: > > How could a link into time based media happen? Use start/stop times. It's been done. Look at the work of Jon Udell or ITConversations... http://www.itconversations.com/help/help-clip.html http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Awww.itconversations.com%20clip Pete -- htt

Re: [videoblogging] Re: tuaw

Adam Quirk wrote: > On 11/4/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >>>Let us into the click-to-purchase-video ITMS universe. >> >>Would that help the videoblogging community or would it help independent >>movie and tv producers? > I think it would help some videobloggers,

Re: [videoblogging] tuaw

Jay dedman wrote: > I have a question: > why arent all blogging platforms publishing RSS 2.0 feeds with enclosures? > Typepad just enabled the option but you must use their irrelevent > "podcast" badge that is hardcoded. Because visionary folks, and those creating the tools aren't always the sam

Re: [videoblogging] Some free ipod encoding tools

Jan McLaughlin wrote: > This seems like likely material to add to the voxmedia wiki since > you've put time into it, Steve. :) How about everyone add at least one thing to the wiki today: http://www.voxmedia.org/wiki/Video I've already done my part. ;) It would be cool if we could all add t

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Software to generate XML text file to download a vlogger's entire archive?

petertheman wrote: > A question. In Mefeedia, I could fairly easily provide an XML feed of > every feed's total archive. The problem is: what format? SMIL XSPF OPML Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future... Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

Re: [videoblogging] Re: help please

David Meade wrote: > On 11/3/05, printaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Why is a feed meant to be reassembled? Its meant to be read and its >>covered by copyright for a reason. Are you saying that all RSS feeds >>are free of copyright and can be reused however you please? > > > RSS isn't a part

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Software to generate XML text file to download a vlogger's entire archive

Joshua Kinberg wrote: > Kent, > > Check out the links to the Atom spec and the OpenSearch format I > posted previously. > They directly adress your concerns. Now the quest is to get these > tools adopted by the blogging software. Then they can be adopted by > aggregators, spiders, search engines,

Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Google Videoblog

Joshua Kinberg wrote: > Enlcosure is a registered Rel attribute for the Atom Link element. So > I believe its: > > http://link/to/video.mov"; > type="video/quicktime" length="[filesize]" title="my awesome video" /> > > See the Atom spec for more details: > < > http://www.atomenabled.org/develope

Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Google Videoblog

Joshua Kinberg wrote: > Atom enclosures are easy. Its just that not many people do it and most > believe that enclosures are only available in RSS. If more tools > support Atom enclosures then it would mean that enclosures could be > used in all flavors of RSS, not only Atom. Of course, the same co

[videoblogging] NetGuide article?

I don't read NetGuide, but they have an article on videoblogging: http://www.netguide.co.nz/magazine/pulp/104/> "New crazes: Video blogs" If you go here: http://www.netguide.co.nz/magazine/mag_links/links.php?issue=104> In the drop-down menu select 'page 13' and click the 'Get Links' button

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Software to generate XML text file to download a vlogger's entire archve

Kent Bye wrote: > > > or, like pete said, pay for a cd of dvd. > This is could be a potential solution that has a business model -- > although you could run into trouble if you've used copyrighted or > non-commercial creative commons-licensed work. Take the open-source approach. I sell you a D

Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Google Videoblog

Enric wrote: > andrew michael baron wrote: > >>http://googlevideo.blogspot.com/ > > I guess they're not providing RSS media enclosed content for the > videos. Looks like you have to follow a link to their flash viewer. Maybe they should use Feedburner! HA HA HA! Google/Blogger like Atom, they

Re: [videoblogging] Sony release PSP media manager and mention video blogs

Steve Watkins wrote: > Just got an email from Sony saying that they now have some (PC only) > software thats $20 and actually allows you to manage your PSP files, > encoding & transfers ina sane way. Make sure it doesn't contain one of those Sony rootkits that will kill your PC if you try to remo

Re: [videoblogging] Re: help please

David Meade wrote: > I dunno I have a hard time with the "You're stealing this content" > argument if you are in fact providing a feed on your site. A feed is > MEANT to allow people to take and reassemble content. I think where we hit a gray area, is in the republishing of the content. If I pub

Re: [videoblogging] Software to generate XML text file to download a vlogger's entire archive?

Kent Bye wrote: > Desire: I'd like to watch the entire video archive from a vlogger. > > Problem: RSS feeds were designed to only update the most frequent vlog > posts. One more note on this idea... I pulled this out of a Feedburner page: FeedBurner does not process feeds that are larger tha

Re: [videoblogging] Software to generate XML text file to download a vlogger's entire archive?

Kent Bye wrote: > Desire: I'd like to watch the entire video archive from a vlogger. > > Problem: RSS feeds were designed to only update the most frequent vlog > posts. I don't know if I'd call it a problem, that's pretty much what RSS was designed to do. Think long term: I've been running a we

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Videomaker's Vidcaster.Net - Seen but not Seen

Deirdre Straughan wrote: > Ah, I see where the confusion comes in. I was talking about the success of > videoblogging in general as a technology/technique/medium - not anyone's > specific videoblog, let alone my own! Success for any individual's vlog is > best defined by that person, of course! No

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Videomaker's Vidcaster.Net - Seen but not Seen

Deirdre Straughan wrote: > On 11/2/05, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>Please define "big success" as the term may have different meanings to >>>>different people. >> >>>Used by millions of people worldwide. Whethe

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Videomaker's Vidcaster.Net - Seen but not Seen

Deirdre Straughan wrote: > On 11/2/05, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>LOL. Seems to me it has already happened, as it was bound to. A >>technology >>>can either be a big success or can be a nice little community - not both >>at the same t

Re: [videoblogging] Re: top feedburner vlogs.. steve garfield gets bumped by the boob

Verdi wrote: > On Oct 31, 2005, at 5:55 PM, Christopher Ivanyi wrote: > >>My question to you -- my challenge to you would be, to stop vlogging >>altogether. If you don't need an audience, and you vlog in order >>achieve the pleasure of having done them, and you don't need the >>validation of an a

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Videomaker's Vidcaster.Net - Seen but not Seen

Jake Ludington wrote: > > In the context of companies who use video blogging to further their cause > without giving anything back to the video blogging community; Microsoft > already does that with Channel 9. The upside of Channel 9 to Microsoft the > corporate entity is creating a warm fuzzy fee

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Videomaker's Vidcaster.Net - Seen but not Seen

Deirdre Straughan wrote: > On 11/1/05, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>What will happen is that videoblogging will change from being a nice >>friendly little community we are used to seeing here, into one where >>people treat it like a competition

Re: [videoblogging] Re: top feedburner vlogs.. steve garfield gets bumped by the boob

Christopher Ivanyi wrote: > I think alot of vloggers are absolutely fooling themselves! Every > vlogger wants/needs an audience - that's the absolute truth. But > here's the trick. When that someone gets their audience, there is > this ineffable something that creeps into the pyche -- the desire

Re: [videoblogging] Initial iPod Compatibility Tests

Verdi wrote: > I just got a new iPod yesterday and I've been doing some tests with > it. Here's what I've figured out so far. Please feel free to add to > this. > > Videos encoded with 3ivx and Apple's mpeg4, with AAC or mpeg4-audio > (QT 6) all seem to work following the tutorials that we

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Videomaker's Vidcaster.Net - Seen but not Seen

Jake Ludington wrote: > >>It hasn't happened to videoblogging yet. It will. > > But what will happen? What exactly will get co-opted from Video Blogging > that didn't originate somewhere else? What will happen is that videoblogging will change from being a nice friendly little community we are

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Videomaker's Vidcaster.Net - Seen but not Seen

Jake Ludington wrote: > In the NerdTV Show #6 > Interview with Dave Winer, http://www.pbs.org/cringely/nerdtv/shows/ , Dave > talks about how Netscape first took his idea of RSS and didn't compeletely > implement it and then Dave released a new, better

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Videomaker's Vidcaster.Net - Seen but not Seen

Gena wrote: > I'm not angry at the guy. But it does say a lot about how one group > will do the figuring out and others come by to adapt and appropriate. > It is capitalism 101. Not saying it is good or bad. I can honestly say that sometimes I get really sick of always being in the first group,

Re: [videoblogging] Chalenge Creating a RSS Feed to publish podcast help

Jay wrote: > I have been trying to create a podcast using feed burner to make the RSS feed > it does not > seem to work I have video files stored on .mac and ourmedia. I keep coming > up with > invalid feed everytime. From reading how it is done I think I am doing > everything right > must

Re: [videoblogging] late entry: Halloween Vlogfest 2005

Steve Garfield wrote: > Your file extensions are .m4v so when I click on your video it's asking > me to open it in iTunes. > > I'd prefer that it opens up on the browser page with QuickTime. > > Can you make your files have a .mov extension? > > On Nov 1, 2005, at 7:18 AM, Digital wrote: > >

Re: [videoblogging] why people videoblog

Jay dedman wrote: > what I realized was that i could record my life. > unlike many podcasts and all TV shows where I would seek for a large > audience, im bascially making a digital scapbook for myself(in the > future) and my friends. > in 100 years, this will be gold because you will see what peo

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Public Eye - West Coast RocketBoom Clone

andrew michael baron wrote: > > Most important to me in particular, in everything that is going on, > is intent. That's why I would say Mobuzz, as a Rocketboom copycat, is > shit because their intent is like a commercial factory in the > elements they choose to emulate with. As long as Publi

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Public Eye - West Coast RocketBoom Clone

Irish Hermit wrote: > > 2. Vlogs are nothing more than homemade television on the internet. > Get over it folks. I've been around too long to think of it as > nothing more than another installment in a long line of the "next > great thing" that will change how we all communicate. Email and

Re: [videoblogging] PC Video Edititing Software

David Meade wrote: > On 10/25/05, Christopher Bergeron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I've been thinking about Vegas Movie Studio from Sony >>but > > I purchased this last night and wish I hadnt. I got the platnum edition > even ... says it will open AVIs ... but it of course doesnt tell you tha

Re: [videoblogging] PC Video Edititing Software

Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote: > > Does Avid Free only import DV? I tried to import some random MOV samples > the other day, but it wouldn't import correctly. I'm an unfortunate soul > with no DV camera. :o) Are there apps to convert to dv stream files? When I got my USB digitizer it came

Re: [videoblogging] Re: iPod reviews (& Mefeedia question)

Bill Streeter wrote: > > Also if anyone wants to let me know how my stuff looks on their ipod > let me know. I'm pretty sure that it's going to be a while before I > get one of my own. I just got a g4 ipod last winter. Yeah, I'm pretty sure it'll be sometime around 2008 when I get an iPod that

Re: [videoblogging] Re: iPod reviews

petertheman wrote: > I just got my video ipod today, watching you all vlogs on it, and it's > fantastic. > > The biggest surprise is this: you know how we always said that video > is different than audio because you can't do anything else while > watching video? > > Not true. With the earplugs in

Re: [videoblogging] Videoegg

luxomaticart wrote: > I recieved this press release this morning - sounds interesting! Caveats are > you have to > have a Typepad account, a PC (not mac compatible yet), the recommended length > for your > video is 2 minutes or less, ads are on the way, and there is no way to > backup a copy

[videoblogging] TUAW "Video Podcast"

The Unofficial Apple Weblog did a "Video Podcast" http://www.tuaw.com/2005/10/23/tuaw-video-podcast-ipod-edition/> The also have this bit in the post "If any of you happen to be compression gurus skilled in the dark art of codecs, please share your arcane wisdom with us in the comments." ;)

Re: [videoblogging] New member, new vlog...abstract, experimental work

Steve Garfield wrote: > When trying to view this on a Mac, the video buffers a lot and is jerky. > > Any other Mac users seeing this? I see lot's of jerky video. No that's not a lame joke, but it seems like lately I've noticed FireANT not playing things as smoothly. It could be my system, I'm r

Re: [videoblogging] Mefeedia API

petertheman wrote: > The "real" Mefeedia API is still a few months off, but meanwhile, if > you want to use the thumbnails pictures mefeedia generates, you can > use this: > > http://api.mefeedia.com/ant/thumbs.php?url=http://www.momentshowing.net/momentshowing/files/amyjoy.mov > > This api will

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Mefeedia API

petertheman wrote: > You have to view source, it's an xml file. > Any chance you could use utf-8 instead of iso-8859-1? Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future... Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Most low income households are no

Re: [videoblogging] Re: New member, new vlog...abstract, experimental work (FEED)

grahamawatson wrote: > I do have this feed already: feed://lossyvideo.blogspot.com/atom.xml (which > Blogger > seems to have made for me), but I didn't make an icon for it as it appears up > in the > address bar (on my browser at least). Is there a something special about the > feed burner >

Re: [videoblogging] Ourmedia status (was: "Weird OurMedia.org error message:)

Lynn Lane wrote: > > Thanks. I am trying to be patient with Our Media, but if you are saying > that some of you are switching over to blip.tv then I might as well > consider that. I am sitting here right now trying to get access to our > media and it is just spinning endlessly with no connec

Re: [videoblogging] Artistic uses of vlogging

Verdi wrote: > So on the one hand I really believe that the act of documenting your > life in public, like many are doing, is art in the way that Warhol's > soup cans or Picasso's found object sculptures are art. On the other > hand, since it's impossible to miss these videoblogs, I'll assum

Re: [videoblogging] Are We The Media?

Jay dedman wrote: >>Yesterday I was shooting some video and walked into a university. I >>was told by an employee "I don't mean to ruin your fun, but you can't >>film in here" (She may have said 'videotape' instead of film, I'm not >>100% sure, I just remember I was told I had to stop shooting. >>I

Re: [videoblogging] Are We The Media?

Jay dedman wrote: > so the short answer is that videobloggers need to be educated on how > to act as "Press". > someone should even photoshop a badge...that we can all print out, add > our picture, and laminate at the local kinko's. > and then we need to also educate the outside world that i am in

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Vlog Cats

Bill Streeter wrote: > I would submit my cat videos but I'm worried about Josh misusing my > cats in some catsploitation videos. You are referring to 'kitty p0rn' I assume? Pete Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Fair play? Video games influencing pol

Re: [videoblogging] Ourmedia status (was: "Weird OurMedia.org error message:)

Jay dedman wrote: > > go ahead and try Blip.tv > as Steve says, Mike and Charles can explain their plans...since they > are self-funded. > I do know that they plan to make cross-posting to the Archive very easy. > go with what works right now. > > and remember, you can always get your own server

Re: [videoblogging] Ourmedia status (was: "Weird OurMedia.org error message:)

Lynn Lane wrote: > > Thanks. I am trying to be patient with Our Media, but if you are saying > that some of you are switching over to blip.tv then I might as well > consider that. I am sitting here right now trying to get access to our > media and it is just spinning endlessly with no connec

[videoblogging] Are We The Media?

Yesterday I was shooting some video and walked into a university. I was told by an employee "I don't mean to ruin your fun, but you can't film in here" (She may have said 'videotape' instead of film, I'm not 100% sure, I just remember I was told I had to stop shooting. I noticed later that the fin

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Vlog programming models - "shows?" (was: Aggregator based...)

gmjoyce_y wrote: > I'd love to get your opinions about something I've been planning that > ties right into this idea. > > I've got a full-length movie I made called "Working Stiff" > (http://www.workingstiff.org) that I was thinking of putting up on the > Web someday so people could download it f

Re: [videoblogging] Re: this will blow your mind

Bill Streeter wrote: > Now we just need a video message board! No, we need a site where we can tag videos, but instead of tagging them with text, we tag them with videos, and each video is a short clip of someone saying the word that you want to tag the video with, so you can watch the tags of

Re: [videoblogging] Re: licenses and permissions

Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote: > If I'm filming you while you stand at the bus stop with a funny look on > your face, you have no measures to stop me from mailing that footage to > every person in the world. In Denmark there are clauses about humiliating > situations like if you were stand

Re: [videoblogging] Re: licenses and permissions (SoapBox Theory)

Paul Knight wrote: > hi worrier, > In summary, I would like to see evidence of someone being sued for > vlogging, I would like to see this too. I just don't want to be the one who gets sued, so in the meantime, I will continue to carefully choose what goes into my posts, avoiding any music tha

Re: [videoblogging] Aggregator based videoblogging financial model

Jay dedman wrote: > One kind is like mine: personal...like home video. > theres no format or regularly scheduled program. > I dont expect anyone to pay for it. hell, Im happy if my close friends watch > it. > im documenting my life for the future. > > another kind are these new "vidcasts" that Ap

Re: [videoblogging] I am looking for more subscribers

BevSykes wrote: >> Paul Knight wrote: >> If you're at a loose end and want something more thrilling than the norm, or just want you >> brain to turn to gello or jelly, you can do less better than visiting my site which offers not >> only bi-lingual french and english titles it also has a grea

Re: [videoblogging] feedburner and itunes help

Paul wrote: > > recently, I tested my new video blog and feedburner. > > after uploading my test video to blogger, I feed burnt it on > feeds.feedburner.com/eslteacherlink > > In fireant, my blog downloads nicely, but on itunes, it says "No media > to download" > > what gives? I see this: h

Re: [videoblogging] Posting a Video PodCast

Paul wrote: > It appears you need an account inorder to submit a podcast... amd to get > an account, you must have a credit card... what if you don't own a > credit card??? For iTunes, just find someone with an account to submit it for you. Post it to the list, and I'm sure someone will submit

Re: [videoblogging] Re: WordPress Auto-enclosures fix

wazman_au wrote: > Just on the point of hand-coding the feed: > > Since I'm doing this, is it possible for me to have one version of a > video at the website, another in the feed? I sort of do this... I use two different urls for the site and the feed. This allows me to track how people got the

Re: [videoblogging] Citizen Journalism - multimedia.05

Beth Kanter wrote: > I must have missed it, but could you explain the Michael Verdi technique > of commenting I think it involves yelling into the camera and removing you clothes... Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the future... Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Videoblogging class, Learning Annex, NYC

Gena wrote: > Focusing a part of the time on the profit potential. This is > unavoidable, people will ask about it. We can't pretend that this does > not exist. I continue to hope that there will be a negotiated middle > ground established between "altruism" and "money, money, make money at > any c

Re: [videoblogging] WordPress Auto-enclosures fix

David Meade wrote: > FYI, for those of you who use wordpress and want to use it's automatic > enclosure feature, but have found you cannot because your hosting service > issues a redirect to the media file (most of them do this I believe), I've > tweaked the code a bit to work with redirects. > ht

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

johngaltsjournal wrote: > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Pete Prodoehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>In all seriousness, it *is* a good idea to apply a license to the things >>you create so that people know how they can use it. And don't forget, if >>

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

johngaltsjournal wrote: > We don't have to all teach from the same workbook. We all run our workshops > a little > differently, so why shouldn't the handouts reflect that? > An aside: doing these sorts of things as a way to drive traffic to your site > makes since, it > just may not end up o

Re: [videoblogging] Vloggers show in Canada?

Markus Sandy wrote: > I got the following message (spam?). Anyone else get one? Anyone interested? > > (not an endorsement, just fyi) Wow, I'll seriously consider using that list for future videoblog posting topics... As long as I can do them in mockumentary style... ;) Pete -- http://tinker

Re: [videoblogging] Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

Josh Leo wrote: > > the "video podcasting group" has 2 members, and Taylor is one of them/the > creator. It doesn't seem like a "community" site in the least... > > I would like to throw wearethemedia.com but i am > having aprehensions about it because it is something i

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

Josh Leo wrote: > On 10/18/05, Dave Huth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Rather than hash out the details of this (what should be on the document, >>who should be >>credited, etc.) in the list, why not start a wiki? That way everyone can >>contribute and work >>it through, and those who aren't inte

Re: [videoblogging] Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

Markus Sandy wrote: > > maybe i'm behind the times > are they putting coke ads in textbooks these days if they donate time or > money to schools? > if so, is that a good thing? Heh, I remember back when I worked at a design firm, and we did book covers for Coke/Pepsi that would be given out to

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Make iTunes 6 accept non-native video formats

Philip Clark wrote: > I learned something from that article that I did not know. You can drag > a .mov file into iTunes, hit command-i and then edit the meta-data for > the file exactly the same as you would for an mp3. Ah! I do this all the time with MP3's but didn't even think of doing this w

Re: [videoblogging] Re: to H.264, or not to H.264?

Bill Streeter wrote: > I won't use it, yet. I think it's great and there is a lot of > potential there, but it's really slow to encode, and older machines > (like older than 2 years) have trouble decoding them. So in the > interest of broader distribution and maximum compatibility I'm > stickin

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Changing iTunes category.

Steve Watkins wrote: > Ive never tried this stuff myself, but I saw that rocketboom is listed > in video podcasts, so their feed should be a good guide for the right > stuff to put in the feed? > > http://www.rocketboom.com/vlog/quicktime_daily_enclosures_itunes.xml It worries me that this feed i

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Changing iTunes category.

Bill Streeter wrote: > Yeah like that BUT I think only the > categories that are in iTunes are valid. And as near as I can tell, > there is no official "Video Podcast" category in the ITMS. If I'm > wrong please let me know, because I wish there was. I ended up > settling for Movies and Television

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Vloggercon 2006 NYC

Adam Quirk wrote: >>I would rather not get a bunch of sponsors...but would rather make it >>like last year where we did it on the cheap. >>its possible. this lets us be as casual and in control as possible. >>its what we want it to be. > We're people, not companies. Companies don't make videoblogs

Re: [videoblogging] any ideas on frequency / text and video combination

Richard wrote: > How are you combining your text posts with your video posts? I post only video. Which can be a bit of a pain if I just want to quickly mention something without creating a video. Though for my videoblog, it works ok... (Of course I have a text blog elsewhere.) > I want to put

Re: [videoblogging] This whole video podcasting thing

Steve Watkins wrote: > I see stories in the media like this CNN one, which turn to audio > podcasters as being the ones who may produce video for the new ipod: > > http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/10/14/spark.podcast.reut/index.html Great quote: "Producing interesting video content is really hard" go

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Video-enabled iPod: What's the Big Deal?

courtwms777 wrote: > Anywhoo, I sent a link to the yahoo podcasters search thingy to a > friend in Portugal and he was like "ho-hum" - just not interested! > What is wrong with people??? Can't they see what all this means??? > Guess not! I've noticed over the years that things seem to start wi

Re: [videoblogging] I took a humungous step...

Susan wrote: > I just contacted my local Apple store here in Plano, TX (Willow Bend) > about setting up a videoblogging workshop. > Whew! > What do you guys think? Am I nutso or what?? Yeah, nutso like a fox! Way to spead the word... Good luck! Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for t

Re: [videoblogging] Video-enabled iPod: What's the Big Deal?

Dave Huth wrote: > He didn't get it and couldn't understand why any of this made any sense > beyond a small > curiosity or geeky fetish. After 30 minutes of instant messaging i realized > that he simply > likes TV. He's fine with it the way it is. He was fine with the public > discourse around

Re: [videoblogging] feed issues (thought i was beyond this!)

duncan speakman wrote: > Hi all, > > thought i was beyond these kind of problems but i just got a note from chris > at 49media saying enclosures weren;t showing up in my feed.. > wondering if this is something to do with linking from the images that i > embed using blogger ('cus it gives you all t

[videoblogging] Re: iTunes FAQ

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Brett Gaylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Would anyone who has succesfully posted their videoblog to the iTunes > directory be willing to give a little FAQ, and maybe post it > somewhere? I wasn't aware that you had to do anything special to > your fee

[videoblogging] Re: podcast directory

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Josh Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > tried making the new feed a while back , same blog, new feed...it was smart > and recognized the source and didnt let it go through...though i used the > blogger atom feed as the sourceis there another source i can us

Re: [videoblogging] Re: VIDEO IPOD!!!!!

Steve Watkins wrote: > Incentives to pay: > > 2) Maybe there arent any adverts in the TV shows. Pay to avoid that > brainrot inserted annoyingly into shows I want to watch? You bet. Correct, commercial-free shows is what you will be getting. Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ videoblog for the fut

Re: [videoblogging] podcast directory

Josh Leo wrote: > I have said this before and I am still unbelievably pissed about it. I > submitted my vlog on the first day 4.9 was released, it did not have the > right information set up (this was before feedburner set up those details) > well they rejected mei heard nothing, then i tried t

Re: [videoblogging] VIDEO IPOD!!!!!

Clint Sharp wrote: > > Hrm. $1.99 seems a little pricey to me for one TV show. That's $50 a > season. I watch about 5 shows not in reruns and probably another 7 to 10 > in syndication. Figuring 15 shows, that'd be $750/yr for the shows I > watch, or about $62.50 a month. I pay less than that fo

Re: [videoblogging] VIDEO IPOD!!!!!

Christopher Bergeron wrote: > Cut and pasted from Apple's Site: [snip] > Watch video podcasts Bing!!! > use an > optional S-video cable with iPod to play VJ on your > TV. Bing!!! So if this thing accepts the feeds of videoblogs put into iTunes... Wow... Pete -- http://tinkernet.org/ video

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >