comments below
On Feb 7, 2008 4:14 PM, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, i forgot one part.
here's what Iove to see as a user.
--Andreas posts a video on his blog.
--we all get excited by it and each post a video on our own blog. This
happens without me having typing in a bunch of
I'm seeing a lot of implicit assumptions in the proposals in this thread.
It is imperative to make those assumptions explicit so it can be evaluated
whether or not they are the correct ones. That discussion is not a
technical discussion and that's why I think it's best to prohibit the use
Oh, i forgot one part.
here's what Iove to see as a user.
--Andreas posts a video on his blog.
--we all get excited by it and each post a video on our own blog. This
happens without me having typing in a bunch of code I dont understand.
--Andreas's blog post grows with each video comment
I like the use of cite and rev/rel -- it's meaning that's already defined.
cite
a rel=enclosure class=comment href=...
type=video/...img class=thumbnail src=thumbnail.jpg //a
In Response to: a rev=comment
href=http://example.com/what_i_am_commenting_to;.../a
/cite
Seems to say it all.
comments below
On Feb 5, 2008 1:33 PM, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the use of cite and rev/rel -- it's meaning that's already defined.
cite
a rel=enclosure class=comment href=...
type=video/...img class=thumbnail src=thumbnail.jpg //a
In Response to: a rev=comment
Hey,
On Feb 5, 2008 10:33 AM, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the use of cite and rev/rel -- it's meaning that's already defined.
cite
a rel=enclosure class=comment href=...
type=video/...img class=thumbnail src=thumbnail.jpg //a
In Response to: a rev=comment
It's wonderful to see excitement about this topic again, but as Sull says
some level of samepageism is missing. I also have a feeling this list is
not the optimal place to design such a system (a smaller working group
would be better for starters).
The last time the topic was seriously
On Feb 5, 2008 3:12 PM, Mike Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no problem with rel=cite as an evolving standard... but most
people don't use it yet and there's no reason we need to stick
strictly to links using rel=cite.
Anyway, it's irrelevant if we're using trackbacks. I assume
Here here.
I'm very pleased with where this is headed.
I'd like to keep the conversation as open (non-technical) as possible.
Where you say media agnostic... I completely agree. It would be
cool to have images embeded in the responses as well... and of course
audio clips.
We could make the
Just scanning.
Sweet, love the gravatar idea and that you already have included video
enclosures in the comment RSS feeds.
Can't wait to read up on gravatars (http://site.gravatar.com/). There
have to be other explorations of this idea too. I think a user
thumbnail is a natural piece of
10 matches
Mail list logo
