Re: [videoblogging] FireAnt Windows Vs. FireAnt Mac

2006-04-04 Thread john coffey
Josh, that explains alot. Just yesterday I was playing around with Fireant on XP Pro and the interface was so different from my beloved OSX. The big problem was that Fireant downloads videos (XP) but I cant find or play them in the FA aggregator. I have to go to documents and then they open in

Re: [videoblogging] FireAnt Windows Vs. FireAnt Mac

2006-04-04 Thread Michael Sullivan
A Unified UI is important. Good choice to work your way towards that.I'd suggest simplifying the UI on windows version even more.Can you direct me to the BitTorrent Support Documentation? I foget... does it also seed torrents or only download and play? In other words, is FA a true BitTorrent

Re: [videoblogging] FireAnt Windows Vs. FireAnt Mac

2006-04-04 Thread Joshua Kinberg
Never heard of that before! It really helps if you send bug reports when you have trouble. Of course, there are many thousands of people whom it works for just fine, so I have no idea of the specifics of your setup or what might be the trouble. Please email me off-list and we can try to work it

Re: [videoblogging] FireAnt Windows Vs. FireAnt Mac

2006-04-04 Thread Joshua Kinberg
No documentation needed, really. BitTorrent files download and play like any other file. While a BitTorrent file is downloading it is simultaneously seeding, as per the BitTorrent protocol. We have not added a configurable seeding ratio after download however (so perhaps it is less of a true

Re: [videoblogging] FireAnt Windows Vs. FireAnt Mac

2006-04-04 Thread Stephanie Bryant
They work the same. I find FireAnt Mac to be easier but that's mainly because it's more familiar (there are some things that drive me batty about it, just as there are some things in FireAnt Windows that drive me batty). They are both well-supported. I typically get a response within 24 hours

Re: [videoblogging] FireAnt Windows Vs. FireAnt Mac

2006-04-04 Thread Harold Johnson
That's exactly it -- I've both Windows and Mac, and 'druther run it on one system. I've installed it on Windows for now...perhaps I'll test it on the Mac someday... Harold On 4/4/06, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They work the same. I find FireAnt Mac to be easier but that's

[videoblogging] FireAnt Windows Vs. FireAnt Mac

2006-04-03 Thread Harold Johnson
Which works better: FireAnt Windows or FireAnt Mac? Are they both well-supported? Does it matter? Harold SPONSORED LINKS Individual Fireant Use

Re: [videoblogging] FireAnt Windows Vs. FireAnt Mac

2006-04-03 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Hello,On 4/3/06, Harold Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Which works better: FireAnt Windows or FireAnt Mac? Are they both well-supported? Does it matter? (Maybe I'm misunderstanding your question, but)As a user you would use whichever is appropriate based on what you have running on

Re: [videoblogging] FireAnt Windows Vs. FireAnt Mac

2006-04-03 Thread Joshua Kinberg
I can try to answer this... though I don't know if you'll be satisfied with the response...FireAnt has a different interface on Windows and on Mac. This is partly due to the fact that we've had very different developers with different styles who were creating on entirely different platforms