[videoblogging] Interesting USA Today article

2006-04-28 Thread Heath
I just read this USA Today articleand cosidering some of the dicussion that was generated by the article on Josh, I found it interesting. SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual

Re: [videoblogging] Interesting USA Today article

2006-04-28 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Hello,On 4/28/06, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just read this USA Today articleand cosidering some of the dicussion that was generated by the article on Josh, I found it interesting. To be honest, I'd rather not have anything or anyone take away my or anyone

Re: [videoblogging] Interesting USA Today article

2006-04-28 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:56:38 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To be honest, I'd rather not have anything or anyone take away my or anyone else's freedom of speech. Doesn't matter what you say or what you talk about, and no matter how distasteful it is to others.

Re: [videoblogging] Interesting USA Today article

2006-04-28 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Hello,On 4/28/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:56:38 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To be honest, I'd rather not have anything or anyone take away my or anyone else's freedom of speech. Doesn't matter what you say or what you talk

Re: [videoblogging] Interesting USA Today article

2006-04-28 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 21:30:18 +0200, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Libel and slander restrictions has existed well before freedom of speech was ever invented as a concept, and there's a long history of certain types of speech being restricted (some worse than others;