With all due respect (and you know I love you), I don't feel comfortable (too much) about
the commercial or economic side of vlogging on this list or in the video conference. After
the videoconference, most of my afternoon was spent on the phone with other vloggers
who wanted to talk about
I love this list just as it is. The flames and chaos just contribute
to the cookin' flavor, and the theory, art, and socializing make for
an incredibly creative community.
SPONSORED LINKS
Individual
Honestly, I just dont join many email lists. If I do, most of them have a finite lifespan (like
planning committee lists, or yearly event lists that are dead most of the time).
If any part of this list moves away-- content producers, programmers, whatever-- I will be
bummed and miss the inf
ps And, clearly, it's time for someone to write "Videoblogging for Dummies".
--
best regards,
Deirdré Straughan
www.straughan.com (personal)
www.tvblob.com (work)
SPONSORED LINKS
Individual
On 7/22/05, Stephanie Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And then Lucas comes along and just effortlessly implemented it
> without splitting into separate lists or forums or whatever:
> Subject line tags!
I used to run a very active forum about CD-recording (back when that
was a hot new tech
around the 22/7/05 Zadi mentioned about [videoblogging] Re: 150 -
Group Tipping Point? that:
>I've been a member of the group since I think October of last year,
>and you do see a difference. Even though the numbers were steadily
>increasing, there wasn't much change in the
I had to stop reading the list for awhile, but I kept subscribing
through gmail. I don't know if the list has become unmanagable because
it consists of more people than the human brain can handle, but maybe
some guidelines Maybe it would be useful to propose some guidelines
for posting.
For ex
For what it's worth, I didn't suggest a forum, just proposed what a
few sub-communities might be. I far prefer to read this list in my
Gmail inbox, not on yet another website I have to check.
And then Lucas comes along and just effortlessly implemented it
without splitting into separate lists
I've been part of many on-line communities over the years, and (as has
been mentioned here several times) there are a few common patterns that
often happen. If you haven't already seen it, I strongly recommend reading
Clay Shirky's "A Group is its own Worst Enemy" available at:
http://www.shi
Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
> And you left out the most important point. It is very hard to figure out
> what's new and what's old in a forum compared the a mailing list.
> There's
> a lot of clicking around and reading old messages to find the new ones.
> And forums are "dumb" in the sense t
Wow. I meant how "war" may be inevitable... invitability of peace
sounds better though...
> (...Wondering if this is how early settlers feel. How tribes form. How
> wars are started. How peace may be inevitable as long as we are human
> beings (this is where we should strive to rewire ourselve
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:52:56 +0200, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Someone has to host it/set it up (probably not a problem)
It will become a problem. Bandwidth costs for high volume forums are not
to be underestimated. Remember that there is a lot more "fluff" on a
webforum
It's an interesting study in sociology.
I've been a member of the group since I think October of last year,
and you do see a difference. Even though the numbers were steadily
increasing, there wasn't much change in the way the members of the
group communicated with one another. Then, yes, the
Heres my summary of the forum idea, incorporating some past points by
various people:
Forum idea good because:
Better seperation of topics in all sorts of ways
People can chat without causing the whole group too much traffic
Good search facilities
Scales up to more users/posts better than a
Oh man. I just wanted to point out a correlation I saw. I'm not
sure that we need to break apart this group in a zillion pieces.
We've had a number of discussions in the past about other groups and
message boards and after a whole bunch of back and forth emails we
come to the conclus
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Stephanie Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Anyway, some possible sub-groups that could evolve out of this one:
> 1) Vlogger-newbies: ...
> 2) Vlogger-politics: ...
> 3) Vlogger-press: ...
> 4) Vlogger-legal: ...
> 5) Vlogger-tech: ...
> 6) Vlogger-comp
sounds like you're talking about a forum, stephanie. that's a really
good idea. yahoo groups are great for small groups but not so great
for large ones. a forum structure would be very beneficial. also,
every forum i've ever been on always has a social thread for off topic
fun. it's important h
17 matches
Mail list logo
