[videoblogging] re: Another Free image server?

2005-10-06 Thread Nerissa \(TheVideoQueen\)
I just tried youTube for the first time, messing around... and it apparently re-formatted the video... and it lost more than HALF of the quality. yuck... A work around is to upload a higher resolution files to video hosts that convert before posting. Kearney, Pat wrote: hey guys,

[videoblogging] Re: Another Free image server?

2005-10-04 Thread Richard
Blinkx has launched a new service that lets users upload and store videos free of charge http://www.blinkx.com Richard --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: from sull originally (thanks sull): the following are some of the free services that can be

[videoblogging] Re: Another Free image server?

2005-10-04 Thread Susan
Richard-- I'm having a hard time finding that on their website; can you post here a link directly to the page where blinkx talks about that? Thanks! :) --Susan http://vlog.kitykity.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Blinkx has launched a new

[videoblogging] Re: Another Free image server?

2005-10-04 Thread Susan
eww! I just tried youTube for the first time, messing around... and it apparently re-formatted the video... and it lost more than HALF of the quality. yuck... Susan http://vlog.kitykity.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: from sull originally

[videoblogging] Re: Another Free image server?

2005-10-04 Thread Bill Streeter
Yeah they're converting it to Flash Video at a pretty low bit rate. I've experimented with Flash video and I know it doesn't have to look that bad. I think they do it like that to save on bitrate. One advantage that flash has is that it's a pretty universal format. Fewer people seem to have

[videoblogging] Re: Another Free image server?

2005-10-04 Thread Bill Streeter
Opps I meant to say save on bandwidth not save on bitrate... doh! Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah they're converting it to Flash Video at a pretty low bit rate. I've experimented with Flash