On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Joly MacFie wrote:
> I have recently shot two copyright related talks:
>
> William Patry : Moral Panics and the Copyright wars
> http://punkcast.com/1666/index.html
>
> David Post : Jefferson's Moose in Cyberspace
> http://punkcast.com/1671/index.html
>
I just wa
I have recently shot two copyright related talks:
William Patry : Moral Panics and the Copyright wars
http://punkcast.com/1666/index.html
David Post : Jefferson's Moose in Cyberspace
http://punkcast.com/1671/index.html
While in some countries it is accepted that an author has a moral right to
ow
I agree with both of you.
The issue begins with us backed into a corner.
That's why Creative Commons was born. As a sensible alternative.
But their should not have been a need for Creative Commons to begin with.
You can look at this issue from the perspective of reality or one of assumed
etiquet
Heath you're totally right. I made a short film a few years ago based
on my brother and I playing Star Trek when we were kids. I actually
wrote to Paramount to ask for permission to use a few sound clips
(transporter, bridge beeps, etc). Not only did they say no, they
reminded me that the words, "E
A sound reasoned, thought out responsesweet...but I would expect no less
from Michael...me, well here is my take.
What I think is disgenious is the following, record labels, corporations,
marketing people, all for years, heck decades have done is try to get us as
consumers to think of their
I read somewhere ( I believe it was in YouTube and Video Marketing in an Hour a
Day ) that when music in a video is flagged as a copyright violation, the owner
of the copyright has two choices:
1) They can get the video pulled.
2) They can choose to have an ad placed over the lower third o
