Interesting point on "fair harbor". Thanks.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, WWWhatsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Good analysis Enric.
>
> The flipside, of course, is that the 'fair harbor' provision also
permits
> the existence of services like YouTube that are, without
Good analysis Enric.
The flipside, of course, is that the 'fair harbor' provision also permits
the existence of services like YouTube that are, without doubt, very
conducive to public speech.
joly
enric wrote:
>This is my opinion on this aspect of the DMCA:
>
--
This is my opinion on this aspect of the DMCA:
The provision in section 512 allowing take-down notices for at least
ten days and subpoena for revealing the uploaders identity without
requiring a determination of copyright probably came from requests by
the RIAA when the law was being formed. At t
Cool! Let me know how that goes.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Gena" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm currently taking a class in cyber-ethics with a focus on issues
> for library workers. We are currently working our way through
> intellectual property issues and the topic
Thanks
;)
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Streeter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've been following your series of videos on this Enric, and you're
> doing a great job with it. Thanks for getting this information out
there.
>
> Bill Streeter
> LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
> www.lofistl.com
I'm currently taking a class in cyber-ethics with a focus on issues
for library workers. We are currently working our way through
intellectual property issues and the topic of DCMA has come up.
Some in the class are in favor of the DCMA based on a surface reading,
it seems "fair" to them. I will c
I've been following your series of videos on this Enric, and you're
doing a great job with it. Thanks for getting this information out there.
Bill Streeter
LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
www.lofistl.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Enric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've posted up several videos
